World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
52
Citations
44706
World Ranking
927
National Ranking
439

Paul W. Holland publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Holland sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 159 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Paul W. Holland D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul W. Holland sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1975 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1975 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Paul W. Holland is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focus on educational assessment and active learning methodologies, demonstrated through recent publications in academic conferences.

Their recent papers include:

  • THE ADVANTAGES OF TESTING HIGHER-ORDER THINKING IN ONLINE OPEN BOOK ASSESSMENTS, 2022, EDULEARN proceedings
  • MAXIMISING THE POTENTIAL OF LABORATORIES TO DELIVER TRANSFORMATIVE ACTIVE LEARNING OPPORTUNITIES VIA EFFECTIVE USE OF LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, 2023, EDULEARN proceedings

Paul W. Holland has collaborated frequently with co-author Laura Mason, with whom they have worked on at least two publications.

The main venue publishing their work is the EDULEARN proceedings, which has featured both of their recent papers.

The scientist has received notable recognitions, including being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1975 and a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) in the same year.

Best Publications

  • Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice

    Yvonne M. M. Bishop;Paul W. Holland;Stephen E. Fienberg

  • Statistics and Causal Inference

    Paul W. Holland

  • Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares

    Paul W. Holland;Roy E. Welsch

  • Discrete Multivariate Analysis

    D. V. Gokhale;Y. M. M. Bishop;S. E. Fienberg;P. W. Holland

  • DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING AND THE MANTEL‐HAENSZEL PROCEDURE

    Paul W. Holland;Dorothy T. Thayer

  • An Exponential Family of Probability Distributions for Directed Graphs

    Paul W. Holland;Samuel Leinhardt

  • Differential Item Performance and the Mantel-Haenszel Procedure.

    Paul W. Holland;Dorothy T. Thayer

  • EVALUATING HYPOTHESES ABOUT DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING1,2

    Alicia P. Schmitt;Paul W. Holland;Neil J. Dorans

  • DIF detection and description: Mantel-Haenszel and standardization.

    Neil J. Dorans;Paul W. Holland

  • Conditional Association and Unidimensionality in Monotone Latent Variable Models

    Paul W. Holland;Paul R. Rosenbaum

  • The Kernel Method of Test Equating

    Alina A. von Davier;Paul W. Holland;Dorothy T. Thayer

  • A dynamic model for social networks

    Paul W. Holland;Samuel Leinhardt

  • Causal Inference, Path Analysis, and Recursive Structural Equations Models

    Paul W. Holland

  • Population Invariance and the Equatability of Tests: Basic Theory and The Linear Case

    Unknown

  • On the sampling theory roundations of item response theory models

    Paul W. Holland

  • CHARACTERIZING THE MANIFEST PROBABILITIES OF LATENT TRAIT MODELS

    Noel Cressie;Paul W. Holland

  • Dependence function for continuous bivariate densities

    Paul W. Holland;Yuchung J. Wang

  • Simultaneous Estimation of Multinomial Cell Probabilities

    Stephen E. Fienberg;Paul W. Holland

  • CAUSAL INFERENCE IN RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES

    Paul W. Holland;Donald B. Rubin

  • DIF DETECTION AND DESCRIPTION: MANTEL‐HAENSZEL AND STANDARDIZATION1,2

    Neil J. Dorans;Paul W. Holland

  • CAUSAL INFERENCE, PATH ANALYSIS AND RECURSIVE STRUCTURAL EQUATIONS MODELS

    Paul W. Holland

  • An Exponential Family of Probability Distributions for Directed Graphs: Rejoinder

    Paul W. Holland;Samuel Leinhardt

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald B. Rubin
Donald B. Rubin Temple University
Stephen E. Fienberg
Stephen E. Fienberg Carnegie Mellon University
Sander Greenland
Sander Greenland University of California, Los Angeles
Paul R. Rosenbaum
Paul R. Rosenbaum University of Pennsylvania
Leo A. Goodman
Leo A. Goodman University of California, Berkeley
Frederick Mosteller
Frederick Mosteller Harvard University
Barry Wellman
Barry Wellman University of Toronto
Theodore R. Holford
Theodore R. Holford Yale University
Rajendra K. Srivastava
Rajendra K. Srivastava Indian School of Business

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees and career pathways, especially in fields like business and data analysis. For many students looking to transition into management roles, exploring online MBA transfer credits options can help accelerate their educational journey by recognizing prior coursework.

Mathematics also provides a strong foundation for advanced studies in data science. Programs specializing in data analysis programs are increasingly popular, equipping graduates with skills to harness big data and inform strategic decisions across industries.

For those prioritizing flexibility and accessibility, it's helpful to consider the easiest MBA options available. These programs often have more lenient admission criteria, making it easier for professionals with diverse backgrounds to continue their education.

Similarly, if pursuing a graduate degree online is a priority, reviewing the easiest online MBA programs to get into offers insights into programs that balance accessibility with quality education, allowing students to advance their careers while managing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Paul W. Holland

Recently Published Articles