World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frederick Mosteller

Frederick Mosteller

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
73
Citations
43547
World Ranking
226
National Ranking
128

Frederick Mosteller publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick Mosteller sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 238 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Frederick Mosteller D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick Mosteller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1986 - Samuel S. Wilks Memorial Award, American Statistical Association (ASA)
  • 1974 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1971 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • 1950 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1949 - Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA)

Overview

Frederick Mosteller was affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Throughout their career, the scientist was recognized by multiple prestigious organizations, highlighting a professional trajectory marked by significant acknowledgments.

Mosteller was a Fellow of the American Statistical Association (ASA) since 1949 and subsequently became a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1950. These fellowships underscored their active involvement and recognition within the scientific community during the mid-20th century.

Further distinctions included election to the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 1971 and membership in the National Academy of Sciences in 1974. These memberships signal engagement with leading scientific and medical research institutions.

In 1986, Mosteller received the Samuel S. Wilks Memorial Award from the American Statistical Association, an award granted for outstanding contributions to statistics, reflecting a recognized impact within that discipline.

The data available did not specify recent papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or specific fields and subfields of study. Consequently, no detailed list of research topics or publications can be provided.

Frederick Mosteller has been noted as deceased, and the overview reflects their historical contributions and professional affiliations without references to ongoing or current work.

Best Publications

  • Data Analysis and Regression: A Second Course in Statistics

    Frederick Mosteller;John Wilder Tukey

  • Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis

    David C. Hoaglin;Frederick Mosteller;John Wilder Tukey

  • Stochastic Models for Learning

    Robert R. Bush;Frederick Mosteller

  • Data analysis and regression

    R. L. Holder;Frederick Mosteller;John W. Tukey

  • A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction.

    Elliott M. Antman;Joseph Lau;Bruce Kupelnick;Frederick Mosteller

  • The comparative effects of postoperative analgesic therapies on pulmonary outcome : Cumulative meta-analyses of randomized, controlled trials

    Jane C. Ballantyne;Daniel B. Carr;Sarah deFerranti;Thomas Suarez

  • Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction

    Joseph Lau;Elliott M. Antman;Jeanette Jimenez-Silva;Bruce Kupelnick

  • Inference and disputed authorship : The Federalist

    Frederick Mosteller;David L. Wallace

  • The Tennessee Study of Class Size in the Early School Grades.

    Frederick Mosteller

  • A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis

    C. S. Berkey;D. C. Hoaglin;F. Mosteller;Graham Colditz

  • A Mathematical Model for Simple Learning

    Robert R. Bush;Frederick Mosteller

  • Some Statistical Methods for Combining Experimental Results

    Nan M. Laird;Frederick Mosteller

  • Recognizing the Maximum of a Sequence

    John P. Gilbert;John P. Gilbert;Frederick Mosteller

  • How study design affects outcomes in comparisons of therapy. I: Medical

    Graham A. Colditz;James N. Miller;Frederick Mosteller

  • Reporting on methods in clinical trials

    Rebecca DerSimonian;L.Joseph Charette;Bucknam McPeek;Frederick Mosteller

  • Association and Estimation in Contingency Tables

    Frederick Mosteller

  • Applied Bayesian and Classical Inference: The Case of The Federalist Papers

    Frederick Mosteller;David L. Wallace

  • Vitamin A supplementation and child mortality. A meta-analysis.

    W W Fawzi;T C Chalmers;M G Herrera;F Mosteller

  • Exploring Data Tables, Trends and Shapes

    Chris Beaumont;D. C. Hoaglin;F. Mosteller;J. W. Tukey

  • Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia: Meta-analyses of initial randomized control trials

    Jane C. Ballantyne;Daniel B. Carr;Thomas C. Chalmers;Keith B.G. Dear

  • Inference and Disputed Authorship: The Federalist

    S. K. Khamis;F. Mosteller;D. L. Wallace

Frequent Co-Authors

John W. Tukey
John W. Tukey Princeton University
Thomas C. Chalmers
Thomas C. Chalmers Harvard University
Graham A. Colditz
Graham A. Colditz Washington University in St. Louis
Stephen E. Fienberg
Stephen E. Fienberg Carnegie Mellon University
Joseph Lau
Joseph Lau Chinese University of Hong Kong
William G. Cochran
William G. Cochran Harvard University
Daniel B. Carr
Daniel B. Carr Tufts University
Elliott M. Antman
Elliott M. Antman Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jane C. Ballantyne
Jane C. Ballantyne University of Washington
Harris Cooper
Harris Cooper Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Mathematics degree in the USA opens doors to numerous online advanced education opportunities that can enhance your career prospects. For professionals seeking leadership roles, exploring the cheapest aacsb online dba programs offers an affordable pathway to a Doctorate in Business Administration with recognized accreditation.

For those interested in finance, combining mathematical skills with financial expertise through masters in finance online programs is a great option. These programs provide the tools needed to excel in quantitative finance, risk management, and investment analysis.

If you aim to broaden your business acumen quickly, consider the shortest mba program online. These fast-track options allow working professionals to advance their education efficiently without compromising quality.

Additionally, the intersection of mathematics and marketing is growing, with data-driven strategies in high demand. Earning a degree through marketing masters programs can lead to well-paying roles that leverage analytical and statistical skills.

Overall, these related degrees provide flexible, cost-effective avenues to build on a Mathematics foundation and pursue diverse career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick Mosteller

Recently Published Articles