World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
9609
World Ranking
3503
National Ranking
14

Patric Jensfelt publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patric Jensfelt sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 201 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Patric Jensfelt D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patric Jensfelt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patric Jensfelt is affiliated with the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Engineering, with a focus on several key subfields including Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Aerospace Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Mechanics, and Automotive Engineering.

Their work covers a variety of main topics such as Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization, Advanced Vision and Imaging, Human Pose and Action Recognition, 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis, Advanced Neural Network Applications, Robotic Path Planning Algorithms, and Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety.

Jensfelt has contributed to a number of recent publications in notable venues. These include:

  • "SLICT: Multi-Input Multi-Scale Surfel-Based Lidar-Inertial Continuous-Time Odometry and Mapping," 2023, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "UFOExplorer: Fast and Scalable Sampling-Based Exploration With a Graph-Based Planning Structure," 2022, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "DUFOMap: Efficient Dynamic Awareness Mapping," 2024, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "BeautyMap: Binary-Encoded Adaptable Ground Matrix for Dynamic Points Removal in Global Maps," 2024, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • "RGB-D-based categorical object pose and shape estimation: Methods, datasets, and evaluation," 2023, Robotics and Autonomous Systems

Their frequent coauthors are:

  • Daniel Duberg
  • Leonard Bruns
  • Qingwen Zhang
  • Maciej K. Wozniak
  • Ajinkya Khoche

Jensfelt's publications have appeared in various venues, with the most frequent being:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Robotics and Autonomous Systems
  • 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC)

Best Publications

  • Active global localization for a mobile robot using multiple hypothesis tracking

    P. Jensfelt;S. Kristensen

  • Conceptual spatial representations for indoor mobile robots

    H. Zender;O. Martínez Mozos;P. Jensfelt;G. J. M. Kruijff

  • Large-scale semantic mapping and reasoning with heterogeneous modalities

    Andrzej Pronobis;Patric Jensfelt

  • Supervised semantic labeling of places using information extracted from sensor data

    íscar Martínez Mozos;Rudolph Triebel;Patric Jensfelt;Axel Rottmann

  • Multi-modal Semantic Place Classification

    A. Pronobis;O. Martínez Mozos;B. Caputo;P. Jensfelt

  • Distributed control of triangular formations with angle-only constraints

    Meysam Basiri;Adrian N. Bishop;Patric Jensfelt

  • The STRANDS Project: Long-Term Autonomy in Everyday Environments

    Nick Hawes;Christopher Burbridge;Ferdian Jovan;Lars Kunze

  • Evaluation of Passing Distance for Social Robots

    Elena Pacchierotti;Henrik Christensen;Patric Jensfelt

  • Efficient Autonomous Exploration Planning of Large-Scale 3-D Environments

    Magnus Selin;Mattias Tiger;Daniel Duberg;Fredrik Heintz

  • Attentional Landmarks and Active Gaze Control for Visual SLAM

    S. Frintrop;P. Jensfelt

  • A Discriminative Approach to Robust Visual Place Recognition

    Andrzej Pronobis;Barbara Caputo;Patric Jensfelt;Henrik Christensen

  • Robot task planning and explanation in open and uncertain worlds

    Marc Hanheide;Moritz Gbelbecker;Graham S. Horn;Andrzej Pronobis

  • GCNv2: Efficient Correspondence Prediction for Real-Time SLAM

    Jiexiong Tang;Ludvig Ericson;John Folkesson;Patric Jensfelt

  • Situated Dialogue and Spatial Organization: What, Where… and Why?

    Geert-Jan M. Kruijff;Hendrik Zender;Patric Jensfelt;Henrik I. Christensen

  • Approaches to Mobile Robot Localization in Indoor Environments

    Patric Jensfelt

  • Vision SLAM in the Measurement Subspace

    J. Folkesson;P. Jensfelt;H.I. Christensen

  • Pose tracking using laser scanning and minimalistic environmental models

    P. Jensfelt;H.I. Christensen

  • A framework for vision based bearing only 3D SLAM

    P. Jensfelt;D. Kragic;J. Folkesson;M. Bjorkman

  • Human-robot embodied interaction in hallway settings: a pilot user study

    E. Pacchierotti;H.I. Christensen;P. Jensfelt

  • A Discriminative Approach to Robust Visual Place Recognition

    Unknown

  • Search in the real world: Active visual object search based on spatial relations

    A. Aydemir;K. Sjoo;J. Folkesson;A. Pronobis

  • Situated Dialogue and Spatial Orga- nization: What, Where… and Why?

    Geert-Jan M. Kruijff;Hendrik Zender;Patric Jensfelt;Henrik I. Christensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Henrik I. Christensen
Henrik I. Christensen University of California, San Diego
Danica Kragic
Danica Kragic Royal Institute of Technology
Barbara Caputo
Barbara Caputo Polytechnic University of Turin
Wolfram Burgard
Wolfram Burgard University of Technology Nuremberg
Bo Wahlberg
Bo Wahlberg Royal Institute of Technology
Carlos Sagues
Carlos Sagues University of Zaragoza
Antonio Frisoli
Antonio Frisoli Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Sven Behnke
Sven Behnke University of Bonn
Nikos G. Tsagarakis
Nikos G. Tsagarakis Italian Institute of Technology
Michael Felsberg
Michael Felsberg Linköping University

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Computer Science, there are several related online degrees that can expand your career options. Many students pursue a data science master online as a next step, combining computing with statistics to solve real-world problems across a range of industries.

Interested in business and finance? Earning an accounting degree online is a flexible way to learn key financial skills, with growing demand for tech-savvy accountants and analysts.

For those passionate about law and justice, the cheapest online master's degree in criminal justice offers specialized knowledge in digital forensics, cybersecurity, and law enforcement technology.

Looking to enter management roles? An online construction management program blends leadership with technical expertise, preparing graduates for dynamic roles in emerging construction technologies and project oversight.

No matter which path you choose, online programs provide flexibility and accessibility—empowering you to advance your education and pursue high-demand tech careers.

Best Scientists Citing Patric Jensfelt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles