World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
4147
World Ranking
7891
National Ranking
408

Olga Ferlian publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olga Ferlian sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Olga Ferlian D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olga Ferlian sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Olga Ferlian is a researcher affiliated with Leipzig University in Germany, specializing in Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

Their research primarily focuses on topics such as:

  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
  • Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Forest ecology and management
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology

Ferlian has contributed to the scientific literature through numerous publications. Recent papers include:

  • "Globally invariant metabolism but density-diversity mismatch in springtails" (2023) published in Nature Communications
  • "Species richness promotes ecosystem carbon storage: evidence from biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments" (2020) published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "Mixing tree species associated with arbuscular or ectotrophic mycorrhizae reveals dual mycorrhization and interactive effects on the fungal partners" (2021) published in Ecology and Evolution
  • "Tree diversity increases productivity through enhancing structural complexity across mycorrhizal types" (2023) published in Science Advances
  • "Global data on earthworm abundance, biomass, diversity and corresponding environmental properties" (2021) published in Scientific Data

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Nico Eisenhauer (75 coauthored works)
  • Helge Bruelheide (15 coauthored works)
  • Julius Quosh (13 coauthored works)
  • Lise Thouvenot (12 coauthored works)
  • Malte Jochum (11 coauthored works)

The researcher frequently publishes in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 10 publications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 6 publications
  • Journal of Ecology with 5 publications
  • Functional Ecology with 4 publications
  • Nature Communications with 3 publications

Best Publications

  • Global distribution of earthworm diversity

    Helen R P Phillips;Carlos A Guerra;Marie L C Bartz;Maria J I Briones

  • Early stage litter decomposition across biomes

    Ika Djukic;Sebastian Kepfer-Rojas;Inger Kappel Schmidt;Klaus Steenberg Larsen

  • Synthesis and future research directions linking tree diversity to growth, survival, and damage in a global network of tree diversity experiments

    Jake J. Grossman;Margot Vanhellemont;Nadia Barsoum;Jürgen Bauhus

  • Towards an integrative understanding of soil biodiversity

    Madhav P. Thakur;Helen R. P. Phillips;Ulrich Brose;Franciska T. De Vries

  • A multitrophic perspective on biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research

    Nico Eisenhauer;Holger Schielzeth;Andrew D. Barnes;Kathryn E. Barry

  • Invasive earthworms erode soil biodiversity: A meta-analysis

    Olga Ferlian;Nico Eisenhauer;Martin Aguirrebengoa;Mariama Camara

  • Global gaps in soil biodiversity data.

    Erin K. Cameron;Erin K. Cameron;Inês S. Martins;Patrick Lavelle;Patrick Lavelle;Jérôme Mathieu

  • Global mismatches in aboveground and belowground biodiversity

    Erin K. Cameron;Erin K. Cameron;Inês S. Martins;Patrick Lavelle;Patrick Lavelle;Jérôme Mathieu

  • A million and more trees for science

    Alain Paquette;Andy Hector;Bastien Castagneyrol;Margot Vanhellemont

  • A niche for ecosystem multifunctionality in global change research.

    Darren P. Giling;Darren P. Giling;Darren P. Giling;Léa Beaumelle;Léa Beaumelle;Helen R. P. Phillips;Helen R. P. Phillips;Simone Cesarz;Simone Cesarz

  • Biodiversity–ecosystem function experiments reveal the mechanisms underlying the consequences of biodiversity change in real world ecosystems

    Nico Eisenhauer;Andrew D. Barnes;Andrew D. Barnes;Simone Cesarz;Dylan Craven

  • Methods to identify the prey of invertebrate predators in terrestrial field studies.

    Klaus Birkhofer;Klaus Birkhofer;Helena Bylund;Peter Dalin;Olga Ferlian

  • Side‐swiped: ecological cascades emanating from earthworm invasions

    Lee E Frelich;Bernd Blossey;Erin K Cameron;Erin K Cameron;Andrea Dávalos;Andrea Dávalos

  • Species richness promotes ecosystem carbon storage: evidence from biodiversity-ecosystem functioning experiments.

    Shan Xu;Nico Eisenhauer;Olga Ferlian;Jinlong Zhang

  • Mycorrhiza in tree diversity–ecosystem function relationships: conceptual framework and experimental implementation

    Olga Ferlian;Simone Cesarz;Dylan Craven;Jes Hines

  • Land-use type and intensity differentially filter traits in above- and below-ground arthropod communities

    Klaus Birkhofer;Klaus Birkhofer;Martin M. Gossner;Tim Diekötter;Claudia Drees

  • Soil chemistry turned upside down: a meta-analysis of invasive earthworm effects on soil chemical properties

    Olga Ferlian;Madhav P Thakur;Alejandra Castañeda González;Layla M San Emeterio

  • Mixing tree species associated with arbuscular or ectotrophic mycorrhizae reveals dual mycorrhization and interactive effects on the fungal partners.

    Heike Heklau;Nicole Schindler;François Buscot;Nico Eisenhauer

  • Distinct effects of host and neighbour tree identity on arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal fungi along a tree diversity gradient

    Olga Ferlian;Kezia Goldmann;Nico Eisenhauer;Mika T. Tarkka

  • Trophic niche differentiation and utilisation of food resources in collembolans based on complementary analyses of fatty acids and stable isotopes

    Olga Ferlian;Olga Ferlian;Bernhard Klarner;Annika E. Langeneckert;Stefan Scheu

  • Temporal dynamics and variation with forest type of phospholipid fatty acids in litter and soil of temperate forests across regions

    Melanie M. Pollierer;Olga Ferlian;Stefan Scheu

  • Trophic interactions in centipedes (Chilopoda, Myriapoda) as indicated by fatty acid patterns: Variations with life stage, forest age and season

    Olga Ferlian;Stefan Scheu;Melanie M. Pollierer

Frequent Co-Authors

Nico Eisenhauer
Nico Eisenhauer Leipzig University
Madhav P. Thakur
Madhav P. Thakur University of Bern
Carlos A. Guerra
Carlos A. Guerra German Center for Integrative Biodiversity Research
Jes Hines
Jes Hines German Center for Integrative Biodiversity Research
Stefan Scheu
Stefan Scheu University of Göttingen
Patrick Lavelle
Patrick Lavelle Sorbonne University
Klaus Birkhofer
Klaus Birkhofer Brandenburg University of Technology
Ulrich Brose
Ulrich Brose Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Simone Cesarz
Simone Cesarz Leipzig University
Diana H. Wall
Diana H. Wall Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens numerous career pathways, including roles in research, conservation, and education. Many students expand their qualifications by exploring interdisciplinary areas, such as healthcare or environmental policy, through online degree programs. These programs offer flexibility, allowing learners to study while working or managing other commitments.

For those interested in healthcare careers with an ecological or evolutionary perspective, several online nursing bridge programs provide clear pathways. Options like rn to np programs help registered nurses advance to nurse practitioner roles. Even individuals without a nursing background can begin a healthcare career using online msn programs for non nurses.

Cost and value are essential considerations for any online program. Prospective students comparing programs should consider the best value nursing education online wgu and other reputable providers. For those starting with a bachelor's degree in nursing, there are also bsn to msn online pathways that make career advancement more affordable and accessible. Exploring these options can help ecology and evolution graduates diversify their expertise and broaden their employment prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Olga Ferlian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles