World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
10597
World Ranking
6837
National Ranking
533

Lina Nashef publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lina Nashef sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 162 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Lina Nashef D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lina Nashef sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lina Nashef is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom. Their primary research fields encompass Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Their work spans multiple subfields, including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, Neurology, and Pharmacology.

The scientist's research largely focuses on Epilepsy research and treatment, Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies, Genomics and Rare Diseases, Autoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, and Genomic Variations and Chromosomal Abnormalities.

Among Lina Nashef's recent publications are:

  • New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE), 2021, Practical Neurology
  • Cenobamate in refractory epilepsy: Overview of treatment options and practical considerations, 2023, Epilepsia Open
  • The impact of inversions across 33,924 families with rare disease from a national genome sequencing project, 2024, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Two-center experience of cannabidiol use in adults with Dravet syndrome, 2021, Seizure
  • Long-term outcome of vagus nerve stimulation for drug-resistant epilepsy using continuous assessment, with a note on mortality, 2022, Seizure

Lina Nashef frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Seizure
  • Practical Neurology
  • Epilepsia Open
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Epidemiology and Infection

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lina Nashef include:

  • Laura Mantoan Ritter
  • Katri Silvennoinen
  • Sanjay M. Sisodiya
  • Meneka K. Sidhu
  • Bettina Schmitz

Best Publications

  • Incidence and mechanisms of cardiorespiratory arrests in epilepsy monitoring units (MORTEMUS): A retrospective study

    Philippe Ryvlin;Lina Nashef;Samden D Lhatoo;Lisa M Bateman

  • Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: current knowledge and future directions.

    Torbjörn Tomson;Lina Nashef;Philippe Ryvlin

  • Unifying the definitions of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy

    Lina Nashef;Elson L. So;Philippe Ryvlin;Torbjörn Tomson

  • Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy: Terminology and Definitions

    Nashef L

  • Case-control study of SUDEP

    Y. Langan;L. Nashef;J. W. Sander

  • Apnoea and bradycardia during epileptic seizures: relation to sudden death in epilepsy.

    L. Nashef;F. Walker;P. Allen;J. W. A. S. Sander

  • Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a series of witnessed deaths

    Y Langan;L Nashef;J W A S Sander

  • Sudden death in epilepsy: a study of incidence in a young cohort with epilepsy and learning difficulty.

    L. Nashef;D. R. Fish;S. Garner;J. W. A. S. Sander

  • Incidence of sudden unexpected death in an adult outpatient cohort with epilepsy at a tertiary referral centre.

    L. Nashef;D. R. Fish;J. W. A. S. Sander;S. D. Shorvon

  • Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

    Laura H. Goldstein;Emily J. Robinson;John D.C. Mellers;Jon Stone

  • A Gene for Autosomal Recessive Limb-Girdle Muscular Dystrophy Maps to Chromosome 2p

    R. Bashir;T. Strachan;S. Keers;A. Stephenson

  • Risk factors in sudden death in epilepsy (SUDEP): the quest for mechanisms.

    Lina Nashef;Neeti Hindocha;Andrew Makoff

  • SUDEP and epilepsy-related mortality in pregnancy.

    Stephan Edey;Nicholas Moran;Nicholas Moran;Lina Nashef

  • Circumstances of death in sudden death in epilepsy: interviews of bereaved relatives

    L Nashef;S Garner;J W A S Sander;D R Fish

  • Epilepsy in the United Kingdom: seizure frequency and severity, anti-epileptic drug utilization and impact on life in 1652 people with epilepsy

    N.F. Moran;K. Poole;G.S. Bell;J. Solomon

  • Epilepsy and sudden death.

    Lina Nashef;Stephen Brown

  • Misdiagnosis in epilepsy: a review and recognition of diagnostic uncertainty

    Fahmida Chowdhury;L. Nashef;R. D. C. Elwes

  • Prevention of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a realistic goal?

    Philippe Ryvlin;Lina Nashef;Torbjörn Tomson

  • Association between the α1a calcium channel gene CACNA1A and idiopathic generalized epilepsy

    B. Chioza;H. Wilkie;L. Nashef;J. Blower

  • Current Issues in the Management of Epilepsy: The Impact of Frequent Seizures on Cost of Illness, Quality of Life, and Mortality

    G A Baker;L Nashef;B A van Hout

  • Authors' Voluntary Retraction: H. Wilkie, A. Osei-Lah, B. Chioza, L. Nashef, D. McCormick, P. Asherson, and A.J. Makoff: Association of the μ-opioid receptor subunit gene and idiopathic generalized epilepsy. Neurology 2002;59:724–728

    Andrew Makoff;Philip Asherson;Lina Nashef

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark P. Richardson
Mark P. Richardson King's College London
Robert D. C. Elwes
Robert D. C. Elwes King's College London
Josemir W. Sander
Josemir W. Sander University College London
Philip Asherson
Philip Asherson King's College London
Simon Shorvon
Simon Shorvon University College London
Philippe Ryvlin
Philippe Ryvlin University Hospital of Lausanne
Torbjörn Tomson
Torbjörn Tomson Karolinska Institute
Charles E. Polkey
Charles E. Polkey King's College London
Ingrid E. Scheffer
Ingrid E. Scheffer University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Lina Nashef

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles