World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mônica Sanches Yassuda

Mônica Sanches Yassuda

Award Badge
Psychology
Brazil
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5504 5113 6 6 298 7845

Mônica Sanches Yassuda publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mônica Sanches Yassuda between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mônica Sanches Yassuda published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2022. 29 of the 417 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2022. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 24 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 24 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 30 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 44 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 5 publications
1997 2025

417 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mônica Sanches Yassuda: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 3
2005 4
2006 10
2007 5
2008 21
2009 24
2010 19
2011 20
2012 28
2013 24
2014 13
2015 17
2016 15
2017 30
2018 21
2019 17
2020 23
2021 28
2022 44
2023 20
2024 24
2025 5
Total 417
Download as CSV

Mônica Sanches Yassuda publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mônica Sanches Yassuda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 291–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 298 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113 298
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Mônica Sanches Yassuda D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mônica Sanches Yassuda sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Psychology in Brazil Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Psychology in Brazil Leader Award

Overview

Mônica Sanches Yassuda is affiliated with the Universidade de São Paulo in Brazil and has an extensive research record primarily within the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work focuses on several subfields including Psychiatry and Mental Health, Physiology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Health, and General Health Professions.

Their publications have been frequently featured in specific academic venues, such as:

  • Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Dementia & Neuropsychologia
  • Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria
  • Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

The main topics covered by their research include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Dementia in Latin America: Paving the way toward a regional action plan," 2020, Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • "Propósito de vida em adultos e idosos: revisão integrativa," 2020, Ciência & Saúde Coletiva
  • "Current trends and challenges on dementia management and research in Latin America," 2020, Journal of Global Health
  • "Does culture shape our understanding of others' thoughts and emotions? An investigation across 12 countries," 2022, Neuropsychology
  • "Latin American Initiative for Lifestyle Intervention to Prevent Cognitive Decline (LatAm-FINGERS): Study design and harmonization," 2023, Alzheimer's & Dementia

Frequent co-authors that collaborate with this researcher include:

  • Anita Liberalesso Néri
  • Ricardo Nitríni
  • Flávia Silva Arbex Borim
  • Paulo Caramelli
  • Sônia Maria Dozzi Brucki

Best Publications

  • Brief screening for mild cognitive impairment: validation of the Brazilian version of the Montreal cognitive assessment.

    Cláudia Maia Memória;Monica Sanches Yassuda;Eduardo Y Nakano;Orestes Vicente Forlenza

  • Executive dysfunction correlates with impaired functional status in older adults with varying degrees of cognitive impairment.

    F. S. Pereira;M. S. Yassuda;A. M. Oliveira;O. V. Forlenza

  • Queixas de memória de idosos e sua relação com escolaridade, desempenho cognitivo e sintomas de depressão e ansiedade

    Débora Lee Vianna Paulo;Mônica Sanches Yassuda

  • Treino de memória no idoso saudável: benefícios e mecanismos

    Mônica Sanches Yassuda;Samila Sathler Tavares Batistoni;Andréa Garofe Fortes;Anita Liberalesso Neri

  • Frailty criteria and cognitive performance are related: data from the FIBRA study in Ermelino Matarazzo, São Paulo, Brazil.

    Mônica Sanches Yassuda;Mônica Sanches Yassuda;A. Lopes;M. Cachioni;M. Cachioni;D. V. S. Falcao

  • Relationships between gender, age, family conditions, physical and mental health, and social isolation of elderly caregivers

    Anita Liberalesso Neri;Mônica Sanches Yassuda;Andréa Cristina Garofe Fortes-Burgos;Efigênia Passarelli Mantovani

  • Meta-memória e auto-eficácia: um estudo de validação de instrumentos de pesquisa sobre memória e envelhecimento

    Mônica Sanches Yassuda;Valéria Bellini Lasca;Anita Liberalesso Neri

  • DRIVING CESSATION: THE PERSPECTIVE OF SENIOR DRIVERS

    Monica S. Yassuda;Jennifer J. Wilson;Otto von Mering

  • The Clock Drawing Test. A review of its accuracy in screening for dementia

    Ivan Aprahamian;José Eduardo Martinelli;Anita Liberalesso Neri;Mônica Sanches Yassuda

  • Mini-Mental State Examination performance in frail, pre-frail, and non-frail community dwelling older adults in Ermelino Matarazzo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Cláudia Rodrigues Monteiro Macuco;Samila Sathler Tavares Batistoni;Andrea Lopes;Meire Cachioni

  • Effects of a multidisciplinar cognitive rehabilitation program for patients with mild Alzheimer’s disease

    Luciane de Fátima Viola;Paula Villela Nunes;Mônica Sanches Yassuda;Ivan Aprahamian

  • Mini-mental State Examination performance in mild cognitive impairment subtypes

    Breno S. O. Diniz;Monica S. Yassuda;Paula V. Nunes;Marcia Radanovic

  • Elderly online: Effects of a digital inclusion program in cognitive performance

    Tiago Nascimento Ordonez;Mônica Sanches Yassuda;Meire Cachioni

  • The accuracy of the Clock Drawing Test compared to that of standard screening tests for Alzheimer's disease: results from a study of Brazilian elderly with heterogeneous educational backgrounds

    Ivan Aprahamian;José Eduardo Martinelli;Anita Liberalesso Neri;Mônica Sanches Yassuda

  • Neuropsychological profile of Brazilian older adults with heterogeneous educational backgrounds.

    Mônica S. Yassuda;Breno S.O. Diniz;Mariana K. Flaks;Luciane F. Viola

  • CAMCOG as a screening tool for diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia in a Brazilian clinical sample of moderate to high education

    Paula V. Nunes;Breno S. Diniz;Marcia Radanovic;Izabella D. Abreu

  • Dementia in Latin America: Paving the way toward a regional action plan.

    Mario Alfredo Parra;Sandra Baez;Lucas Sedeño;Cecilia Gonzalez Campo

  • [Methodology and social, demographic, cognitive, and frailty profiles of community-dwelling elderly from seven Brazilian cities: the FIBRA Study].

    Anita Liberalesso Neri;Mônica Sanches Yassuda;Ludgleydson Fernandes de Araújo;Maria do Carmo Eulálio

  • Doença de Alzheimer: revisão da epidemiologia e diagnóstico

    Ivan Aprahamian;José Eduardo Martinelli;Mônica Sanches Yassuda

  • Mild cognitive impairment: cognitive screening or neuropsychological assessment?

    Breno Satler De Oliveira Diniz;Paula Villela Nunes;Monica S. Yassuda;Fernanda S. Pereira

  • Hypertension Severity Is Associated With Impaired Cognitive Performance.

    Henrique C.S. Muela;Valeria A. Costa‐Hong;Mônica S. Yassuda;Natália C. Moraes

Frequent Co-Authors

Orestes Vicente Forlenza
Orestes Vicente Forlenza Universidade de São Paulo
Ricardo Nitrini
Ricardo Nitrini Universidade de São Paulo
Paulo Caramelli
Paulo Caramelli Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Wagner F. Gattaz
Wagner F. Gattaz Universidade de São Paulo
Benito Pereira Damasceno
Benito Pereira Damasceno State University of Campinas
Marcia Radanovic
Marcia Radanovic Universidade de São Paulo
Mario A. Parra
Mario A. Parra University of Strathclyde
Antônio Lúcio Teixeira
Antônio Lúcio Teixeira The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Sergio Della Sala
Sergio Della Sala University of Edinburgh
Erika Borella
Erika Borella University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right online degree in psychology can shape your career path in meaningful ways. For those seeking clinical practice, psyd online programs apa accredited offer rigorous training that meets the gold standard of the American Psychological Association and are a top choice for those who want to become licensed clinical psychologists.

Interest in behavioral analysis is also on the rise, with bcba certification programs available both in-person and online for aspiring Board Certified Behavior Analysts. These programs prepare graduates to work across educational, clinical, and research settings.

For students wanting to streamline their education, masters and doctorate combined programs in psychology provide an accelerated path from foundational coursework to advanced practice or research roles, saving both time and tuition costs.

If you are passionate about research or academic careers, pursuing a phd developmental psychology can open doors to roles in teaching, policy development, or advanced scientific study.

Carefully comparing these pathways ensures your psychology education aligns with your personal goals and career ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Mônica Sanches Yassuda

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles