World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
64
Citations
11079
World Ranking
9905
National Ranking
4336

Michael R. King publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. King sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 245 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Michael R. King D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael R. King sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

Michael R. King is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions in subfields such as Molecular Biology, Oncology, Immunology, Physiology, and Cell Biology.

The scientist's work addresses a variety of main topics, including:

  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions

Recent publications by Michael R. King include:

  • The Future of AI in Medicine: A Perspective from a Chatbot, 2022, Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Frequent co-authors collaborating with King are:

  • Joshua D. Greenlee
  • Jenna A. Dombroski
  • Nerymar Ortiz-Otero
  • Jacob M. Hope
  • Cynthia A. Reinhart-King

The researcher often publishes in journals such as:

  • Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
  • Cancer Research
  • BMC Cancer
  • Nanoscale Advances
  • Molecules

One of their most cited works is "The Future of AI in Medicine: A Perspective from a Chatbot" (2022) published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, which has been cited extensively within the academic community.

In recognition of contributions to the field, the scientist was awarded the status of Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) in 2014.

Best Publications

  • Age-Related Intimal Stiffening Enhances Endothelial Permeability and Leukocyte Transmigration

    John Huynh;Nozomi Nishimura;Kuldeepsinh Rana;John M. Peloquin

  • Toxoplasma gondii Triggers Release of Human and Mouse Neutrophil Extracellular Traps

    Delbert S. Abi Abdallah;Changyou Lin;Carissa J. Ball;Michael R. King

  • Targeted drug delivery to circulating tumor cells via platelet membrane-functionalized particles

    Jiahe Li;Yiwei Ai;Lihua Wang;Pengcheng Bu

  • Computational and Experimental Models of Cancer Cell Response to Fluid Shear Stress

    Michael J. Mitchell;Michael R. King

  • TRAIL-coated leukocytes that kill cancer cells in the circulation

    Michael J. Mitchell;Elizabeth Wayne;Kuldeepsinh Rana;Chris B. Schaffer

  • Fluid shear stress sensitizes cancer cells to receptor-mediated apoptosis via trimeric death receptors

    Michael J Mitchell;Michael R King

  • A physical sciences network characterization of non-tumorigenic and metastatic cells

    David B. Agus;Jenolyn F. Alexander;Wadih Arap;Shashanka Ashili

  • Multiparticle Adhesive Dynamics. Interactions between Stably Rolling Cells

    Michael R. King;Daniel A. Hammer

  • The State Diagram for Cell Adhesion Mediated by Two Receptors

    Sujata K. Bhatia;Michael R. King;Daniel A. Hammer

  • Nonmuscle myosin heavy chain IIA mediates integrin LFA-1 de-adhesion during T lymphocyte migration

    Nicole A. Morin;Patrick W. Oakes;Young-Min Hyun;Dooyoung Lee

  • Cooperative Effects of Matrix Stiffness and Fluid Shear Stress on Endothelial Cell Behavior

    Julie C. Kohn;Dennis W. Zhou;François Bordeleau;Allen L. Zhou

  • Use of naturally occurring halloysite nanotubes for enhanced capture of flowing cells.

    Andrew D. Hughes;Michael R. King

  • Regulation of ATP utilization during metastatic cell migration by collagen architecture.

    Matthew R. Zanotelli;Zachary E. Goldblatt;Joseph P. Miller;Francois Bordeleau

  • Platelets and Megakaryocytes Contain Functional Nuclear Factor-κB

    Sherry L. Spinelli;Ann E. Casey;Stephen J. Pollock;Jacqueline M. Gertz

  • Mechanics of Transient Platelet Adhesion to von Willebrand Factor under Flow

    Nipa A. Mody;Oleg Lomakin;Teresa A. Doggett;Thomas G. Diacovo

  • Platelet adhesive dynamics. Part I: characterization of platelet hydrodynamic collisions and wall effects.

    Nipa A. Mody;Michael R. King

  • PKCζ mediates disturbed flow-induced endothelial apoptosis via p53 SUMOylation

    Kyung Sun Heo;Hakjoo Lee;Patrizia Nigro;Tamlyn Thomas

  • Microtube Device for Selectin-Mediated Capture of Viable Circulating Tumor Cells from Blood

    Andrew D. Hughes;Jeff Mattison;Laura T. Western;John D. Powderly

  • Supplementary Materials for Age-Related Intimal Stiffening Enhances Endothelial Permeability and Leukocyte Transmigration

    John Huynh;Nozomi Nishimura;Kuldeepsinh Rana;John M. Peloquin

  • Unnatural killer cells: TRAIL-coated leukocytes that kill cancer cells in the circulation

    Michael J. Mitchell;Elizabeth C. Wayne;Kuldeepsinh Rana;Chris B. Schaffer

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Mitchell
Michael J. Mitchell University of Pennsylvania
Jane L. Liesveld
Jane L. Liesveld University of Rochester Medical Center
Cynthia A. Reinhart-King
Cynthia A. Reinhart-King Vanderbilt University
Daniel A. Hammer
Daniel A. Hammer University of Pennsylvania
Owen J. T. McCarty
Owen J. T. McCarty Oregon Health & Science University
Jaap Jan Zwaginga
Jaap Jan Zwaginga Leiden University Medical Center
Gerard B. Nash
Gerard B. Nash University of Birmingham
Johan W. M. Heemskerk
Johan W. M. Heemskerk Maastricht University
Ali Khademhosseini
Ali Khademhosseini Terasaki Foundation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Biology and biochemistry open the door to diverse career opportunities in healthcare, research, and nutrition. For those interested in advancing their clinical practice, there are bridge programs like the medical assistant to lpn bridge program. Such options help current professionals step up to more advanced nursing roles with added flexibility and speed.

Many students prefer the convenience and pace of online biology degree programs. These accelerated pathways allow learners to gain core skills and knowledge needed for jobs in health science, teaching, research, or beyond, all while accommodating busy schedules.

If you’re drawn specifically to patient care, earning an online asn (Associate of Science in Nursing) degree can help you start working as a registered nurse in less time. This route is ideal for motivated individuals ready to enter the workforce quickly.

For those passionate about health and wellness, a nutrition-focused pathway such as the best online nutrition degree can be an excellent option. Graduates often pursue roles in clinical nutrition, community outreach, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Michael R. King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles