World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 32 8796 8174 414 396 197 2987

Anya M. Reading publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anya M. Reading between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anya M. Reading published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 6.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2019. 16 of the 214 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2019. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 9 publications
1991 2025

214 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anya M. Reading: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 2
2002 2
2003 6
2004 4
2005 3
2006 8
2007 4
2008 5
2009 3
2010 8
2011 4
2012 5
2013 9
2014 11
2015 14
2016 14
2017 5
2018 13
2019 22
2020 19
2021 12
2022 9
2023 12
2024 7
2025 9
Total 214
Download as CSV

Anya M. Reading publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anya M. Reading sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 188–197 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 197 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401 197
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Anya M. Reading D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anya M. Reading sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278 32
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anya M. Reading is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia and specializes in Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research contributions span several subfields, notably Geophysics, Atmospheric Science, Artificial Intelligence, Global and Planetary Change, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their work focuses on multiple topics including cryospheric studies and observations, seismic waves and analysis, geological and geochemical analysis, seismology and earthquake studies, seismic imaging and inversion techniques, geology and paleoclimatology research, and geochemistry and geologic mapping.

Recent research papers authored or coauthored by Anya M. Reading include:

  • Antarctic Geothermal Heat Flow Model: Aq1, 2020, Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems
  • Antarctic geothermal heat flow and its implications for tectonics and ice sheets, 2022, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Fine-Scale Geothermal Heat Flow in Antarctica Can Increase Simulated Subglacial Melt Estimates, 2022, Geophysical Research Letters
  • An ObsPy Library for Event Detection and Seismic Attribute Calculation: Preparing Waveforms for Automated Analysis, 2021, Journal of Open Research Software
  • A Grid for Multidimensional and Multivariate Spatial Representation and Data Processing, 2020, Journal of Open Research Software

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Tobias Stål
  • JA Halpin
  • R Turner
  • Mareen Lösing
  • Felicity McCormack

Publication venues where their work frequently appears are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Frontiers in Earth Science
  • Nature Reviews Earth & Environment
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Journal of Open Research Software

Best Publications

  • Lithospheric structure of Tasmania from a novel form of teleseismic tomography

    Nicholas Rawlinson;Anya M. Reading;Brian L. N. Kennett

  • Contrasts in lithospheric structure within the Australian Craton - insights from surface wave tomography

    Stewart Fishwick;Brian Kennett;Anya Reading

  • AusMoho: the variation of Moho depth in Australia

    B. L. N. Kennett;M. Salmon;E. Saygin

  • Steps in lithospheric thickness within eastern Australia, evidence from surface wave tomography

    Stewart Fishwick;Stewart Fishwick;M. Heintz;M. Heintz;Brian Kennett;Anya Reading;Anya Reading

  • Crustal architecture of the Capricorn Orogen, Western Australia and associated metallogeny

    S.P. Johnson;A.M. Thorne;I.M. Tyler;R.J. Korsch

  • The upside of uncertainty: Identification of lithology contact zones from airborne geophysics and satellite data using random forests and support vector machines

    Matthew J. Cracknell;Anya M. Reading

  • Lithologic mapping using Random Forests applied to geophysical and remote-sensing data: A demonstration study from the Eastern Goldfields of Australia

    Stephen Kuhn;Matthew J. Cracknell;Anya M. Reading

  • High-frequency ambient noise tomography of southeast Australia: New constraints on Tasmania's tectonic past

    Mallory Young;Nicholas Rawlinson;Pierre Arroucau;Anya M Reading

  • Anomalous lithosphere beneath the Proterozoic of western and central Australia: A record of continental collision and intraplate deformation?

    Stewart Fishwick;Anya Reading

  • Mapping geology and volcanic-hosted massive sulfide alteration in the Hellyer–Mt Charter region, Tasmania, using Random Forests™ and Self-Organising Maps

    M. J. Cracknell;A. M. Reading;A. W. McNeill

  • The seismic structure of Precambrian and early Palaeozoic terranes in the Lambert Glacier region, East Antarctica

    AM Reading

  • Improved inversion for seismic structure using transformed, S-wavevector receiver functions: Removing the effect of the free surface

    Anya Reading;Brian Kennett;Malcolm Sambridge

  • Polarization filtering for automatic picking of seismic data and improved converted phase detection

    Anya M. Reading;Weijian Mao;David Gubbins

  • Contrasts in mantle structure beneath Australia: Relation to Tasman Lines?

    Brian L. N. Kennett;Stewart Fishwick;Anya M. Reading;Nicholas Rawlinson

  • Seismic structure of the Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia

    A.M. Reading;B.L.N. Kennett;Mike Dentith

  • Antarctic seismicity and neotectonics

    AM Reading

  • Source locations of teleseismic P, SV, and SH waves observed in microseisms recorded by a large aperture seismic array in China

    Qiaoxia Liu;Qiaoxia Liu;Qiaoxia Liu;Keith D. Koper;Relu Burlacu;Sidao Ni

  • Antarctic Geothermal Heat Flow Model: Aq1

    Tobias Stål;Anya M. Reading;Jacqueline A. Halpin;Joanne M. Whittaker

  • Antarctic geothermal heat flow and its implications for tectonics and ice sheets

    Unknown

  • The frequency dependence and locations of short‐period microseisms generated in the Southern Ocean and West Pacific

    M. Gal;A. M. Reading;S. P. Ellingsen;L. Gualtieri

  • Evidence of micro-continent entrainment during crustal accretion.

    S. Pilia;S. Pilia;N. Rawlinson;R. A. Cayley;T. Bodin

  • Lithospheric structure of the Pilbara Craton, Capricorn Orogen and northern Yilgarn Craton, Western Australia, from teleseismic receiver functions

    Anya Reading;Brian Kennett

  • Deconvolution enhanced direction of arrival estimation using one- and three-component seismic arrays applied to ocean induced microseisms

    M. Gal;A.M. Reading;S.P. Ellingsen;K.D. Koper

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas Rawlinson
Nicholas Rawlinson University of Cambridge
Jacqueline A. Halpin
Jacqueline A. Halpin University of Tasmania
Hrvoje Tkalčić
Hrvoje Tkalčić Australian National University
Joanne M. Whittaker
Joanne M. Whittaker University of Tasmania
Brian Kennett
Brian Kennett Australian National University
Keith D. Koper
Keith D. Koper University of Utah
Malcolm Sambridge
Malcolm Sambridge Australian National University
Mark Hemer
Mark Hemer CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Thomas Bodin
Thomas Bodin École Normale Supérieure de Lyon
Kerry Gallagher
Kerry Gallagher University of Rennes

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities that often intersect with other fields. For example, veterans seeking creative outlets might explore military friendly online photography degree programs, which combine technical skills with visual storytelling. This creative skillset can complement environmental research or public outreach roles within Earth Science.

Language skills also play a vital role in global Earth Science work. Pursuing best online spanish degree programs for veterans can equip students with communication tools necessary for research projects and collaborations across Spanish-speaking countries.

Moreover, gaining proficiency through one of the online degrees in spanish presents an affordable and efficient way to build languages skills that enhance career prospects in government agencies, NGOs, and consultancy firms focused on environmental policy.

Lastly, creative disciplines like writing are important for effective science communication. Many students interested in blending science with narrative can consider online mfa creative writing programs, which are increasingly accessible and affordable.

Best Scientists Citing Anya M. Reading

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles