World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
33
Citations
14607
World Ranking
9386
National Ranking
3962

Maximilian Riesenhuber publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maximilian Riesenhuber sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 90 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Maximilian Riesenhuber D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maximilian Riesenhuber sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maximilian Riesenhuber is affiliated with Georgetown University Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans Neuroscience and Psychology, with a focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. They also contribute to fields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Social Psychology, and Artificial Intelligence.

The main topics of their work include multisensory perception and integration, visual attention and saliency detection, action observation and synchronization, and face recognition and perception. Other areas of interest are neuroscience and music perception, tactile and sensory interactions, as well as visual perception and processing mechanisms.

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Maximilian Riesenhuber include:

  • Srikanth R. Damera
  • Lillian Chang
  • Suneel Banerjee
  • Laurie S. Glezer
  • Xiong Jiang

Their research has been published in various venues, with multiple papers appearing at bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory). Other publication venues include the Journal of Vision, Neurobiology of Language, Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, and the Journal of Neuroscience.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Maximilian Riesenhuber are:

  • Evidence for a Spoken Word Lexicon in the Auditory Ventral Stream (2023) - Neurobiology of Language
  • Leveraging Prior Concept Learning Improves Generalization From Few Examples in Computational Models of Human Object Recognition (2021) - Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
  • Metamodal Coupling of Vibrotactile and Auditory Speech Processing Systems through Matched Stimulus Representations (2023) - Journal of Neuroscience
  • Evidence for face selectivity in early vision (2020) - bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neural basis of learning to perceive speech through touch using an acoustic-to-vibrotactile speech sensory substitution (2021) - bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex

    Maximilian Riesenhuber;Tomaso Poggio

  • Robust Object Recognition with Cortex-Like Mechanisms

    T. Serre;L. Wolf;S. Bileschi;M. Riesenhuber

  • Categorical Representation of Visual Stimuli in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex

    David J. Freedman;Maximilian Riesenhuber;Maximilian Riesenhuber;Tomaso Poggio;Tomaso Poggio;Earl K. Miller

  • Models of object recognition.

    Maximilian Riesenhuber;Tomaso Poggio

  • A comparison of primate prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices during visual categorization.

    David J. Freedman;Maximilian Riesenhuber;Tomaso Poggio;Earl K. Miller

  • Neural mechanisms of object recognition

    Maximilian Riesenhuber;Tomaso Poggio

  • Evidence for Highly Selective Neuronal Tuning to Whole Words in the “Visual Word Form Area”

    Laurie S. Glezer;Xiong Jiang;Maximilian Riesenhuber

  • Attentional Selection for Object Recognition A Gentle Way

    Dirk Walther;Laurent Itti;Maximilian Riesenhuber;Tomaso Poggio

  • Categorization training results in shape- and category-selective human neural plasticity.

    Xiong Jiang;Evan Bradley;Regina A. Rini;Thomas Zeffiro

  • Visual categorization and the primate prefrontal cortex: neurophysiology and behavior.

    David J. Freedman;Maximilian Riesenhuber;Maximilian Riesenhuber;Tomaso Poggio;Tomaso Poggio;Earl K. Miller

  • A model of V4 shape selectivity and invariance.

    Charles Cadieu;Minjoon Kouh;Anitha Pasupathy;Charles E. Connor

  • Experience-Dependent Sharpening of Visual Shape Selectivity in Inferior Temporal Cortex

    David J. Freedman;Maximilian Riesenhuber;Tomaso Poggio;Tomaso Poggio;Earl K. Miller;Earl K. Miller

  • Are cortical models really bound by the "binding problem"?

    Maximilian Riesenhuber;Tomaso Poggio

  • Evaluation of a shape-based model of human face discrimination using FMRI and behavioral techniques.

    Xiong Jiang;Ezra Rosen;Thomas Zeffiro;John VanMeter

  • Intracellular measurements of spatial integration and the MAX operation in complex cells of the cat primary visual cortex

    Ilan Lampl;David Ferster;Tomaso Poggio;Maximilian Riesenhuber;Maximilian Riesenhuber

  • Prefrontal Cortex Activity during Flexible Categorization

    Jefferson E. Roy;Maximilian Riesenhuber;Tomaso Poggio;Earl K. Miller

  • Face Processing in Humans is Compatible with a Simple Shape-Based Model of Vision

    Maximilian Riesenhuber;Izzat Jarudi;Sharon Gilad;Pawan Sinha

  • Realistic Modeling of Simple and Complex Cell Tuning in the HMAX Model, and Implications for Invariant Object Recognition in Cortex

    Thomas Serre;Maximilian Riesenhuber

  • Adding Words to the Brain's Visual Dictionary: Novel Word Learning Selectively Sharpens Orthographic Representations in the VWFA

    Laurie S. Glezer;Judy Kim;Josh Rule;Xiong Jiang

  • Individual variability in location impacts orthographic selectivity in the "visual word form area".

    Laurie S. Glezer;Maximilian Riesenhuber

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Freedman
David J. Freedman University of Chicago
Simon J. Thorpe
Simon J. Thorpe Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Theo Geisel
Theo Geisel Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization
Josef P. Rauschecker
Josef P. Rauschecker Georgetown University Medical Center
John W. VanMeter
John W. VanMeter Georgetown University Medical Center
Thomas Serre
Thomas Serre Brown University
Thomas A. Zeffiro
Thomas A. Zeffiro Harvard University
Volker Blanz
Volker Blanz University of Siegen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Maximilian Riesenhuber

Trending Scientists