World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
5477
World Ranking
10461
National Ranking
599

Matthew Rockloff publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Rockloff sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 172 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Matthew Rockloff D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew Rockloff sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms.

    Erika. Langham;Hannah. Thorne;Matthew. Browne;Phillip. Donaldson

  • Assessing gambling-related harm in Victoria: a public health perspective

    Matthew Browne;Erika Langham;Vijay Rawat;Nancy Greer

  • Going against the herd: psychological and cultural factors underlying the 'vaccination confidence gap'

    Matthew Browne;Patricia Thomson;Matthew Justus Rockloff;Gordon Pennycook

  • Factor analysis of barriers to treatment for problem gambling.

    Matthew J. Rockloff;Grant Schofield

  • The Dynamics of Self-Evaluation

    Robin R. Vallacher;Andrzej Nowak;Michael Froehlich;Matthew Rockloff

  • A typical problem gambler affects six others

    Belinda C. Goodwin;Matthew Browne;Matthew Rockloff;Judy Rose

  • Validation of the Short Gambling Harm Screen (SGHS): A Tool for Assessment of Harms from Gambling.

    Matthew Browne;Belinda C Goodwin;Matthew J Rockloff

  • Breaking Bad: Comparing Gambling Harms Among Gamblers and Affected Others.

    En Li;Matthew Browne;Vijay Rawat;Erika Langham

  • A population-level metric for gambling-related harm

    Matthew Browne;Nancy Greer;Vijay Rawat;Matthew Rockloff

  • An Experiment on the Social Facilitation of Gambling Behavior

    Matthew Justus Rockloff;Victoria Dyer

  • Prevalence of gambling-related harm provides evidence for the prevention paradox.

    Matthew Browne;Matthew J. Rockloff

  • Focused Interactive Learning: A Tool for Active Class Discussion:

    Helen C. Harton;Deborah S. Richardson;Ricardo E. Barreras;Matthew J. Rockloff

  • Validation of the Consumption Screen for Problem Gambling (CSPG)

    Matthew J. Rockloff

  • Associations between occupational indicators and total, work-based and leisure-time sitting: a cross-sectional study

    Corneel. Vandelanotte;Mitch J. Duncan;Camille. Short;Matthew Justus. Rockloff

  • The Four Es of Problem Gambling: A Psychological Measure of Risk

    Matthew J. Rockloff;Victoria Dyer

  • Measuring the Burden of Gambling Harm in New Zealand

    Matthew Browne;Maria Bellringer;Nancy Greer;Komathi Kolandai-Matchett

  • How Do Different Occupational Factors Influence Total, Occupational, and Leisure-Time Physical Activity?

    Corneel Vandelanotte;Camille Short;Matthew Rockloff;Lee Di Millia

  • Anti-vaccination and pro-CAM attitudes both reflect magical beliefs about health.

    Gabrielle M. Bryden;Matthew Browne;Matthew Rockloff;Carolyn Unsworth

  • A Multivariate Evaluation of 25 Proximal and Distal Risk-Factors for Gambling-Related Harm.

    Matthew Browne;Nerilee Hing;Matthew Rockloff;Alex M. T. Russell

  • Unambiguous evidence that over half of gambling problems in Australia are caused by electronic gambling machines: Results from a large-scale composite population study

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew Browne
Matthew Browne Central Queensland University
Nerilee Hing
Nerilee Hing Central Queensland University
Alex Blaszczynski
Alex Blaszczynski University of Sydney
David C. Hodgins
David C. Hodgins University of Calgary
Max Abbott
Max Abbott Auckland University of Technology
Nicki A. Dowling
Nicki A. Dowling Deakin University
Michael J. A. Wohl
Michael J. A. Wohl Carleton University
Natalie J. Loxton
Natalie J. Loxton Griffith University
Daniel King
Daniel King Flinders University
Rachel A. Volberg
Rachel A. Volberg University of Massachusetts Amherst

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Matthew Rockloff