World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
10995
World Ranking
4630
National Ranking
784

Mark Wardman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wardman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 189 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mark Wardman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Wardman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Wardman is affiliated with the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily lies within the fields of Social Sciences and Engineering, with a focus on transportation-related studies.

The main fields of study encompass:

  • Social Sciences
  • Engineering

Subfields related to their work include:

  • Transportation
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Building and Construction

The key topics frequently addressed in their research are:

  • Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Urban and Freight Transport Logistics
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Transport and Economic Policies

Wardman has published multiple papers in notable venues, often contributing to Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice and Transportation. Other publication venues include Transport Policy, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Research Square.

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
  • Transportation
  • Transport Policy
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Recent papers authored by Wardman include:

  • Meta-analysis of price elasticities of travel demand in great britain: Update and extension (2022), Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
  • Meta-analysis of British time-related demand elasticity evidence: An update (2022), Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice
  • The demand impacts of train punctuality in great britain: systematic review, meta-analysis and some new econometric insights (2021), Transportation

Wardman has collaborated with several co-authors on these works. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Richard Batley
  • Jeremy Toner
  • Jawaher Binsuwadan
  • Gerard de Jong
  • Phill Wheat

Best Publications

  • The demand for public transport: The effects of fares, quality of service, income and car ownership

    Neil Paulley;Richard Balcombe;Roger Mackett;Helena Titheridge

  • Public transport values of time

    Mark Wardman

  • The demand for public transport: a practical guide

    Richard Balcombe;Roger Mackett;Neil Paulley;John Preston

  • Estimation of the determinants of bicycle mode share for the journey to work using census data

    John Parkin;Mark Wardman;Matthew Page

  • Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work

    Mark Wardman;Miles Tight;Matthew Page

  • A REVIEW OF BRITISH EVIDENCE ON TIME AND SERVICE QUALITY VALUATIONS

    Mark Wardman

  • Meta-analysis of UK values of travel time: An update

    Pedro A.L. Abrantes;Mark R. Wardman

  • A COMPARISON OF REVEALED PREFERENCE AND STATED PREFERENCE MODELS OF TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR

    M Wardman

  • THE VALUE OF TRAVEL TIME. A REVIEW OF BRITISH EVIDENCE

    M Wardman

  • Twenty Years of Rail Crowding Valuation Studies: Evidence and Lessons from British Experience

    Mark Wardman;Gerard Whelan

  • Driver response to variable message signs: a stated preference investigation

    M Wardman;P.W Bonsall;J.D Shires

  • Explaining Variations in Public Acceptability of Road Pricing Schemes

    S. Jaensirisak;M. Wardman;A.D. May

  • Public acceptability of personal carbon trading and carbon tax

    Abigail L. Bristow;Mark Wardman;Alberto M. Zanni;V. Phani K. Chintakayala

  • Models of perceived cycling risk and route acceptability

    John Parkin;Mark Wardman;Matthew Page

  • Values of Travel Time Savings UK

    P.J. Mackie;M. Wardman;A.S. Fowkes;G. Whelan

  • THE DESIGN OF STATED PREFERENCE TRAVEL CHOICE EXPERIMENTS. WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO INTERPERSONAL TASTE VARIATIONS

    T Fowkes;M Wardman

  • Values of travel time in Europe: Review and meta-analysis

    Mark Wardman;V. Phani K. Chintakayala;Gerard de Jong

  • Evaluating the demand for new cycle facilities

    P Hopkinson;M Wardman

  • Traffic related noise and air quality valuations: evidence from stated preference residential choice models

    Mark Wardman;Abigail L Bristow

  • Demand for rail travel and the effects of external factors

    Mark Wardman

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephane Hess
Stephane Hess University of Leeds
John M. Rose
John M. Rose University of Sydney
Paul Moayyedi
Paul Moayyedi McMaster University
Graham Currie
Graham Currie Monash University
Michiel C.J. Bliemer
Michiel C.J. Bliemer University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to a variety of rewarding careers. Many students pursue an accredited online psychology degree to begin pathways in counseling, research, or mental health services. These degrees offer flexibility and accessibility, making them ideal for busy learners.

If social work interests you, consider finding the easiest msw online program to get started. These programs can be more accessible and may help students quickly transition into meaningful roles supporting individuals and communities.

For those aiming for advanced clinical practice or academic positions, the best online psyd programs focus on developing high-level psychological assessment and intervention skills. These degrees are suited to those seeking to become licensed psychologists.

Finally, aspiring marriage and family therapists can look for online masters mft programs that offer a faster route to professional licensure. Many online programs are designed for working professionals who need both speed and flexibility.

Online education in these fields makes it easier to balance personal commitments with academic advancement, while broadening career opportunities in vital social sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Wardman

Trending Scientists