World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
9299
World Ranking
9028
National Ranking
419

Mark Pilkington publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Pilkington sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 140 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark Pilkington D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Pilkington sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Pilkington is affiliated with the Geological Survey of Canada in Canada. Their professional focus is connected to geological sciences through this primary institutional association.

There is no available data on recent papers authored by Mark Pilkington, nor information on frequent co-authors or recurring publication venues associated with their work.

Specific details on the main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of research are not provided, limiting insight into the precise academic focus areas explored by this scientist.

No book publications or awards have been documented for Mark Pilkington in the provided information.

Mark Pilkington is currently active and not deceased.

Best Publications

  • Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal

    Walter R. Roest;Jacob Verhoef;Mark Pilkington

  • Chicxulub Crater: A possible Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary impact crater on the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico

    Alan R. Hildebrand;Glen T. Penfield;David A. Kring;Mark Pilkington

  • EMAG2: A 2-arc min resolution Earth Magnetic Anomaly Grid compiled from satellite, airborne, and marine magnetic measurements

    S. Maus;S. Maus;U. Barckhausen;H. Berkenbosch;N. Bournas

  • The geophysical signature of terrestrial impact craters

    M. Pilkington;R. A. F. Grieve

  • 3-D magnetic imaging using conjugate gradients

    Mark Pilkington

  • Size and morphology of the Chicxulub impact crater

    Jo Morgan;Mike Warner;John Brittan

  • New standards for reducing gravity data: The North American gravity database

    William J Hinze;Carlos Aiken;John Brozena;Bernard Coakley

  • Identifying remanent magnetization effects in magnetic data

    Walter R. Roest;Mark Pilkington

  • 3D magnetic data-space inversion with sparseness constraints

    Mark Pilkington

  • Fractal magnetization of continental crust

    M. Pilkington;J. P. Todoeschuck

  • Size and structure of the Chicxulub crater revealed by horizontal gravity gradients and cenotes

    A. R. Hildebrand;M. Pilkington;M. Connors;C. Ortiz-Aleman

  • Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation

    P. Keating;M. Pilkington

  • Gravity and magnetic field modeling and structure of the Chicxulub Crater, Mexico

    Mark Pilkington;Alan R. Hildebrand;Carlos Ortiz-Aleman

  • Mapping Chicxulub crater structure with gravity and seismic reflection data

    A. R. Hildebrand;M. Pilkington;C. Ortiz-Aleman;R. E. Chavez

  • Magnetic interpretation using the 3D analytic signal

    Unknown

  • Using fractal crustal magnetization models in magnetic interpretation1

    M. Pilkington;M.E. Gregotski;J.P. Todoeschuck

  • Determination of crustal interface topography from potential fields

    Mark Pilkington;D. J. Crossley

  • Understanding imaging methods for potential field data

    Maurizio Fedi;Mark Pilkington

  • Contact Mapping From Gridded Magnetic Data–a Comparison of Techniques

    Mark Pilkington;Pierre Keating

  • Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation

    Richard A. F. Grieve;W. Uwe Reimold;Joanna Morgan;Ulrich Riller

  • Three‐dimensional magnetic imaging of the Chicxulub Crater

    Mark Pilkington;Alan R. Hildebrand

  • Mitigating remanent magnetization effects in magnetic data using the normalized source strength

    Mark Pilkington;Majid Beiki

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter R. Roest
Walter R. Roest University of Western Brittany
Carol A. Finn
Carol A. Finn United States Geological Survey
Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi
Jaime Urrutia-Fucugauchi National Autonomous University of Mexico
Richard A. F. Grieve
Richard A. F. Grieve University of Western Ontario
Stefan Maus
Stefan Maus University of Colorado Denver
John A. Percival
John A. Percival Geological Survey of Canada
Michael E. Purucker
Michael E. Purucker Goddard Space Flight Center
Carmen Gaina
Carmen Gaina University of Oslo
Maurizio Fedi
Maurizio Fedi University of Naples Federico II
Kenneth L. Buchan
Kenneth L. Buchan Geological Survey of Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career opportunities that often intersect with other fields. For instance, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental research, data analysis, and resource management. Exploring gis degree programs can enhance your technical skills and improve your employability in environmental mapping and planning.

Leadership and policy-making are also vital in environmental sectors. Many professionals pursue advanced degrees like an MPA to influence public policies and drive sustainable initiatives. If you're considering this path, check out top online MPA programs designed for working professionals interested in environmental governance.

The social dynamics of environmental issues often require a solid understanding of human behavior and societies. An online sociology degree bachelors can provide valuable insights into societal impacts and help develop effective community-based environmental strategies.

For those aiming at higher academic or leadership roles, online doctoral programs offer flexibility. Specifically, some doctorate degree online no dissertation options allow you to earn a doctorate without the lengthy dissertation process, making it easier to balance studies with professional life.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Pilkington

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles