World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
57
Citations
16815
World Ranking
4281
National Ranking
1937

Mark E. Molliver publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Molliver sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 79 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mark E. Molliver D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Molliver sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark E. Molliver was affiliated with Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in the United States. Their academic career was connected to this institution, where research and scholarly activity took place.

Throughout their career, Mark E. Molliver did not have frequently documented co-authors or a list of recent papers available in the provided data. There was also no specific information on main fields, subfields of study, main topics of work, or frequent publication venues related to their research output.

There were no recorded book publications or awards attributed to Mark E. Molliver in the presented data.

Due to the absence of additional detailed records on publications, collaborations, and research themes, a comprehensive overview of Mark E. Molliver's scientific contributions cannot be fully outlined beyond the known affiliation.

Best Publications

  • D-serine, an endogenous synaptic modulator: localization to astrocytes and glutamate-stimulated release.

    Michael J. Schell;Mark E. Molliver;Solomon H. Snyder

  • Methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) and methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) cause selective ablation of serotonergic axon terminals in forebrain: immunocytochemical evidence for neurotoxicity

    E O'Hearn;G Battaglia;EB De Souza;MJ Kuhar

  • In situ injection of kainic acid: A new method for selectively lesioning neuronal cell bodies while sparing axons of passage

    Joseph T. Coyle;Mark E. Molliver;Michael J. Kuhar

  • An immunohistochemical study of serotonin neuron development in the rat: Ascending pathways and terminal fields

    Hart G.W. Lidov;Mark E. Molliver

  • 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine destroy serotonin terminals in rat brain: quantification of neurodegeneration by measurement of [3H]paroxetine-labeled serotonin uptake sites.

    G Battaglia;S Y Yeh;E O'Hearn;M E Molliver

  • The serotoninergic innervation of cerebral cortex: different classes of axon terminals arise from dorsal and median raphe nuclei.

    Barry E. Kosofsky;Mark E. Molliver

  • The serotonin innervation of the cerebral cortex in the rat--an immunohistochemical analysis.

    H.G.W. Lidov;R. Grzanna;M.E. Molliver

  • Calcium sensing receptor: molecular cloning in rat and localization to nerve terminals.

    Martial Ruat;Mark E. Molliver;Adele M. Snowman;Solomon H. Snyder

  • Immunohistochemical study of the development of serotonergic neurons in the rat CNS.

    Hart G.W. Lidov;Mark E. Molliver

  • d-Serine as a Neuromodulator: Regional and Developmental Localizations in Rat Brain Glia Resemble NMDA Receptors

    Michael J. Schell;Roscoe O. Brady;Mark E. Molliver;Solomon H. Snyder

  • Serotonergic neuronal systems: what their anatomic organization tells us about function.

    Mark E. Molliver

  • NEURONAL NITRIC OXIDE SYNTHASE ACTIVATION AND PEROXYNITRITE FORMATION IN ISCHEMIC STROKE LINKED TO NEURAL DAMAGE

    Mikael J. L. Eliasson;Zhihong Huang;Robert J. Ferrante;Robert J. Ferrante;Masao Sasamata

  • The development of synapses in cerebral cortex of the human fetus.

    Mark E. Molliver;Ivica Kostovic;Hendrik Van Der Loos

  • The locus coeruleus in the rat: an immunohistochemical delineation

    R. Grzanna;M.E. Molliver

  • (+/-)3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine selectively damages central serotonergic neurons in nonhuman primates.

    George A. Ricaurte;Lysia S. Forno;Mary A. Wilson;Louis E. DeLanney

  • Organization of raphe-cortical projections in rat: a quantitative retrograde study.

    Elizabeth O'Hearn;Mark E. Molliver

  • The distribution and orientation of noradrenergic fibers in neocortex of the rat: an immunofluorescence study.

    John H. Morrison;Reinhard Grzanna;Mark E. Molliver;Joseph T. Coyle

  • Neurotoxicity of MDMA and Related Compounds: Anatomic Studies

    Mark E. Molliver;Urs V. Berger;Laura A. Mamounas;Derek C. Molliver

  • Dual serotoninergic projections to forebrain in the rat: morphologically distinct 5-HT axon terminals exhibit differential vulnerability to neurotoxic amphetamine derivatives.

    Laura A. Mamounas;Crystal A. Mullen;Elizabeth O'hearn;Mark E. Molliver

  • Ontogeny of the serotonergic projection to rat neocortex: transient expression of a dense innervation to primary sensory areas.

    Robert J. D'Amato;Mary E. Blue;Brian L. Largent;David R. Lynch

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph T. Coyle
Joseph T. Coyle Harvard University
Solomon H. Snyder
Solomon H. Snyder Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
John H. Morrison
John H. Morrison University of California, Davis
Michael J. Kuhar
Michael J. Kuhar Emory University
Mary E. Blue
Mary E. Blue Kennedy Krieger Institute
George A. Ricaurte
George A. Ricaurte Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Jonathan L. Katz
Jonathan L. Katz National Institute on Drug Abuse
Barry E. Kosofsky
Barry E. Kosofsky Cornell University
Robert J. Ferrante
Robert J. Ferrante Boston University
Randy J. Nelson
Randy J. Nelson West Virginia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open the door to a wide range of complementary online degrees and career routes. Many students combine their neuroscience background with training in social work or counseling to expand their opportunities in healthcare, research, or mental health services.

For those interested in social advocacy or clinical roles, there are several msw programs available online that allow for accelerated study and flexible scheduling. Students focused on understanding the human mind might benefit from an accelerated psychology bachelor's degree online, which can help build a strong foundation in behavioral science.

If you are considering a future in counseling, choosing a cacrep accredited programs online ensures you meet high standards for professional practice and licensure. Cost-conscious learners can also consider the cheapest counseling degree online options to start or advance their careers without large student debt.

Pairing neuroscience studies with these related online programs can help you pursue diverse, rewarding pathways in mental health, academia, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Molliver

Recently Published Articles