World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Margaret K. Keiley

Margaret K. Keiley

Margaret K. Keiley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Margaret K. Keiley between 1992 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Margaret K. Keiley published across 30 years, from 1992 to 2021, averaging 1.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 2013. 1 of the 50 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 2013. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1992 2021

50 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Margaret K. Keiley: publications per year, 1992 to 2021
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 3
2001 2
2002 5
2003 2
2004 0
2005 1
2006 2
2007 3
2008 0
2009 5
2010 2
2011 3
2012 5
2013 6
2014 2
2015 3
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 50
Download as CSV

Margaret K. Keiley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret K. Keiley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Margaret K. Keiley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Margaret K. Keiley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Margaret K. Keiley was affiliated with Auburn University in the United States. Their academic contributions focused on intersecting domains within Psychology, Social Sciences, and Medicine.

Keiley's research explored several specific subfields, including Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Health, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Their work involved key topics related to Sleep and related disorders, Health disparities and outcomes, and Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet.

One of Keiley's documented research papers is titled Socioeconomic Status and Sleep among Couples, published in 2020 in the journal Behavioral Sleep Medicine.

  • Socioeconomic Status and Sleep among Couples (2020, Behavioral Sleep Medicine)

The scientist collaborated frequently with a group of coauthors, which included:

  • Ekjyot K. Saini
  • Thomas E. Fuller-Rowell
  • Adrienne M. Duke
  • Mona El-Sheikh

Publications by Keiley appeared notably in Behavioral Sleep Medicine, which was the primary venue associated with their work.

  • Behavioral Sleep Medicine

Best Publications

  • A cross-domain growth analysis: externalizing and internalizing behaviors during 8 years of childhood.

    Margaret Kraatz Keiley;John E. Bates;Kenneth A. Dodge;Gregory S. Pettit

  • Developmental trajectories of adolescents' depressive symptoms: predictors of change.

    Judy Garber;Margaret K. Keiley;Nina C. Martin

  • The timing of child physical maltreatment: a cross-domain growth analysis of impact on adolescent externalizing and internalizing problems.

    Margaret Kraatz Keiley;Tasha R. Howe;Kenneth A. Dodge;John E. Bates

  • Differential risks of covarying and pure components in mother and teacher reports of externalizing and internalizing behavior across ages 5 to 14.

    Margaret K. Keiley;Nicholas Lofthouse;John E. Bates;Kenneth A. Dodge

  • Economic adversity and children's sleep problems: multiple indicators and moderation of effects.

    Mona El-Sheikh;Erika J. Bagley;Margaret Keiley;Lori Elmore-Staton

  • The Effects of Differentiation of Self, Adult Attachment, and Sexual Communication on Sexual and Marital Satisfaction: A Path Analysis

    Tina M. Timm;Margaret K. Keiley

  • Early child-care selection : Variation by geographic location, maternal characteristics, and family structure

    Judith D. Singer;Bruce Fuller;Margaret K. Keiley;Anne Wolf

  • Attachment, Identity, and Intimacy: Parallels Between Bowlby's and Erikson's Paradigms

    Joe F. Pittman;Margaret K. Keiley;Jennifer L. Kerpelman;Brian E. Vaughn

  • BIRACIAL YOUTH AND FAMILIES IN THERAPY: ISSUES AND INTERVENTIONS

    Stephanie Milan;Margaret K. Keiley

  • Predicting the developmental course of mother-reported monitoring across childhood and adolescence from early proactive parenting, child temperament, and parents' worries.

    Gregory S. Pettit;Margaret K. Keiley;Robert D. Laird;John E. Bates

  • Food Insecurity Is Associated with Poor Sleep Outcomes among US Adults

    Meng Ding;Margaret K Keiley;Kimberly B Garza;Patricia A Duffy

  • Marital conflict and growth in children's internalizing symptoms: the role of autonomic nervous system activity.

    Mona El-Sheikh;Margaret Keiley;Stephen Erath;W. Justin Dyer

  • Why Do Daughters Leave School in Southern Africa? Family Economy and Mothers' Commitments

    Bruce Fuller;Judith D. Singer;Margaret Keiley

  • Navigating Interdependence: How Adolescents Raised Solely by Grandparents Experience Their Family Relationships

    Megan L. Dolbin-MacNab;Margaret K. Keiley

  • DYADIC RESEARCH IN MARRIAGE AND FAMILY THERAPY: METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS

    Andrea K. Wittenborn;Megan L. Dolbin-MacNab;Margaret K. Keiley

  • Attachment and affect regulation: a framework for family treatment of conduct disorder.

    Margaret K. Keiley

  • Intimate Relationship Aggression in College Couples: Family-of-Origin Violence, Egalitarian Attitude, Attachment Security

    Günnur Karakurt;Margaret Keiley;German Posada

  • Affect Regulation and the Cycle of Violence Against Women: New Directions for Understanding the Process

    Mary E. Dankoski;Margaret K. Keiley;Volker Thomas;Pamela Choice

  • Multiple-family group intervention for incarcerated adolescents and their families: a pilot project.

    Margaret K. Keiley

  • Longitudinal relations between marital aggression and alcohol problems.

    Peggy S. Keller;Mona El-Sheikh;Margaret Keiley;Pei-Ju Liao

Frequent Co-Authors

Mona El-Sheikh
Mona El-Sheikh Auburn University
Kenneth A. Dodge
Kenneth A. Dodge Duke University
John E. Bates
John E. Bates Indiana University
Gregory S. Pettit
Gregory S. Pettit Auburn University
Stephen A. Erath
Stephen A. Erath Auburn University
Edith Chen
Edith Chen Northwestern University
Bruce Fuller
Bruce Fuller University of California, Berkeley
Joseph A. Buckhalt
Joseph A. Buckhalt Auburn University
Alexander T. Vazsonyi
Alexander T. Vazsonyi University of Kentucky
Douglas H. Sprenkle
Douglas H. Sprenkle Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to a wide range of online degrees and professional pathways, especially in mental health counseling. Many students start with an undergraduate degree in psychology before choosing an area of specialization. Online programs make it easier to balance studies with work or family commitments.

To help you understand the requirements in different locations, explore guides on how to become a mental health counselor in Fremont and how to become a mental health counselor in Fresno. Each region can have unique educational and licensing regulations. For example, you can review the Garland mental health counselor education requirements or learn how to become a mental health counselor in Gilbert.

No matter your goals, online degrees in psychology and counseling can lead to rewarding careers in clinical practice, research, or community support. Stay informed about local requirements, as this can shape your coursework and field experience.

Best Scientists Citing Margaret K. Keiley

Recently Published Articles