World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
M. Jae Moon

M. Jae Moon

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
31
Citations
10291
World Ranking
2724
National Ranking
20

M. Jae Moon publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Jae Moon sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 74 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

M. Jae Moon D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Jae Moon sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?

    M. Jae Moon

  • Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government

    Eric W. Welch;Charles C. Hinnant;M. Jae Moon

  • Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare?

    Donald F. Norris;M. Jae Moon

  • Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level*

    M. Jae Moon;M. Jae Moon;Donald F. Norris

  • Organizational Commitment Revisited in New Public Management: Motivation, Organizational Culture, Sector, and Managerial Level

    M. Jae Moon

  • Fighting COVID-19 with Agility, Transparency, and Participation: Wicked Policy Problems and New Governance Challenges.

    M. Jae Moon

  • Municipal Reinvention: Managerial Values and Diffusion among Municipalities

    M. Jae Moon;Peter deLeon

  • Does the Perception of Red Tape Constrain IT Innovativeness in Organizations? Unexpected Results from a Simultaneous Equation Model and Implications

    M. Jae Moon;Stuart Bretschneider

  • E-Procurement Management in State Governments: Diffusion of E-Procurement Practices and Its Determinants

    M. Jae Moon

  • Policy learning and crisis policy-making: quadruple-loop learning and COVID-19 responses in South Korea

    Sabinne Lee;Changho Hwang;M. Jae Moon

  • Do Age, Gender, and Sector Affect Job Satisfaction? Results From the Korean Labor and Income Panel Data

    Kwangho Jung;M. Jae Moon;Sung Deuk Hahm

  • The Evolution of Internal IT Applications and e-Government Studies in Public Administration Research Themes and Methods

    M. Jae Moon;Jooho Lee;Chul Young Roh

  • Shaping Administrative Reform and Governance: An Examination of the Political Nexus Triads in Three Asian Countries

    Myung Jae Moon;Patricia Ingraham

  • Same Bed, Different Dreams? A Comparative Analysis of Citizen and Bureaucrat Perspectives on E-Government

    M. Jae Moon;Eric W. Welch

  • What Drives Global E-Governance? An Exploratory Study at a Macro Level

    M.J. Moon;E.W. Welch;W. Wong

  • Is the World “Flat” or “Spiky”? Rethinking the Governance Implications of Globalization for Economic Development* †

    Richard C. Feiock;M. Jae Moon;Hyung Jun Park

  • Managerial Coaching Efficacy, Work-Related Attitudes, and Performance in Public Organizations A Comparative International Study

    Sewon Kim;Toby M. Egan;M. Jae Moon

  • The Double-Edged Sword of Public-Resource Dependence: The Impact of Public Resources on Autonomy and Legitimacy in Korean Cultural Nonprofit Organizations

    Kwangho Jung;M. Jae Moon

  • Theorizing Contemporary Public Management: International and Comparative Perspectives

    Rachel Elizabeth Ashworth;Ewan Ferlie;Gerhard Hammerschmid;M. Jae Moon

  • Assessing organizational performance: exploring differences between internal and external measures

    Rhys William Andrews;George Alexander Boyne;M. Jae Moon;Richard M. Walker

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric W. Welch
Eric W. Welch Arizona State University
Richard C. Feiock
Richard C. Feiock Florida State University
Richard M. Walker
Richard M. Walker Lingnan University
Giuseppe Grossi
Giuseppe Grossi Kristianstad University
Rhys William Andrews
Rhys William Andrews Cardiff University
Trish Reay
Trish Reay University of Alberta
George Alexander Boyne
George Alexander Boyne University of Aberdeen
Barry Bozeman
Barry Bozeman Arizona State University
Gene A. Brewer
Gene A. Brewer Arizona State University
Ewan Ferlie
Ewan Ferlie King's College London

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing M. Jae Moon

Recently Published Articles