World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
39
Citations
6763
World Ranking
7650
National Ranking
44

Luis C. Dias publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis C. Dias sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 146 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Luis C. Dias D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Luis C. Dias sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit: A model using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network and an application

    Ehsan Asadi;Manuel Gameiro da Silva;Carlos Henggeler Antunes;Luís Dias

  • Multi-objective optimization for building retrofit strategies: A model and an application

    Ehsan Asadi;Manuel Gameiro da Silva;Carlos Henggeler Antunes;Luís Dias

  • A multi-objective optimization model for building retrofit strategies using TRNSYS simulations, GenOpt and MATLAB

    Ehsan Asadi;Manuel Gameiro da Silva;Carlos Henggeler Antunes;Luís Dias

  • An aggregation/disaggregation approach to obtain robust conclusions with ELECTRE TRI

    Luis C. Dias;Vincent Mousseau;José Rui Figueira;João C. N. Clímaco

  • GIS-based photovoltaic solar farms site selection using ELECTRE-TRI:Evaluating the case for Torre Pacheco, Murcia, Southeast of Spain

    Juan Miguel Sánchez-Lozano;Carlos Henggeler Antunes;M. Socorro García-Cascales;Luis C. Dias

  • Resolving inconsistencies among constraints on the parameters of an MCDA model

    Vincent Mousseau;Vincent Mousseau;José Rui Figueira;José Rui Figueira;Luis C. Dias;Carlos Gomes da Silva

  • Additive aggregation with variable interdependent parameters: the VIP Analysis software

    Luis C. Dias;João C. N. Clímaco

  • Valued outranking relations in ELECTRE providing manageable disaggregation procedures

    Vincent Mousseau;Vincent Mousseau;Luis C. Dias

  • Assessing the performance of biogas plants with multi-criteria and data envelopment analysis

    Reinhard Madlener;Carlos Henggeler Antunes;Luis C. Dias

  • ELECTRE TRI for Groups with Imprecise Information on Parameter Values

    Luis Dias;João Clímaco

  • Inferring Electre’s veto-related parameters from outranking examples

    Luis C. Dias;Vincent Mousseau;Vincent Mousseau

  • Supporting groups in sorting decisions: methodology and use of a multi-criteria aggregation-disaggregation DSS

    Sébastien Damart;Luis Dias;Vincent Mousseau

  • Supporting groups in sorting decisions: Methodology and use of a multi-criteria aggregation/disaggregation DSS

    Sébastien Damart;Luis C. Dias;Vincent Mousseau

  • Dealing with imprecise information in group multicriteria decisions: a methodology and a GDSS architecture

    Luis C. Dias;João C. N. Clímaco

  • IRIS: a DSS for multiple criteria sorting problems

    Luís C. Dias;Vincent Mousseau

  • Biogas plants site selection integrating Multicriteria Decision Aid methods and GIS techniques: a case study in a Portuguese region.

    Sandra Silva;Luís Alçada-Almeida;Luís C. Dias

  • Simple procedures of choice in multicriteria problems without precise information about the alternatives' values

    Paula Sarabando;Luís C. Dias

  • Applying Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to the Life-Cycle Assessment of vehicles

    Ana Rita Domingues;Pedro Marques;Rita Garcia;Fausto Freire

  • Structuring an MCDA model using SSM: A case study in energy efficiency

    Luís Miguel Pires Neves;Luís Miguel Cândido Dias;Carlos Alberto Henggeler Antunes;António Gomes Martins

  • A multi-criteria decision approach to sorting actions for promoting energy efficiency

    Luís Miguel Pires Neves;António Gomes Martins;Carlos Alberto Henggeler Antunes;Luís Miguel Cândido Dias

  • On computing ELECTRE's credibility indices under partial information

    Luis C. Dias;João N. Clímaco

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlos Henggeler Antunes
Carlos Henggeler Antunes University of Coimbra
Vincent Mousseau
Vincent Mousseau CentraleSupélec
Fausto Freire
Fausto Freire University of Coimbra
José Rui Figueira
José Rui Figueira Instituto Superior Técnico
Carlos A. Silva
Carlos A. Silva University of Florida
Reinhard Madlener
Reinhard Madlener RWTH Aachen University
Luc Moens
Luc Moens University of Antwerp
Luís Arroja
Luís Arroja University of Aveiro
Roland Clift
Roland Clift University of Surrey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Engineering and Technology, a range of office administration degree programs can develop vital organizational and technical skills. These programs provide foundational knowledge in managing office environments, often blending technology and business practices.

Many students also explore business administration courses online to expand their understanding of management, finance, and entrepreneurship. These courses can complement a technical background and open doors to leadership roles.

For those seeking advanced leadership opportunities, an online master's degree in organizational leadership provides advanced training in team management, organizational change, and strategic decision-making. These skills are valuable for technology professionals aiming to lead projects or departments.

Additionally, an online mba in operations management programs offers a focused approach to optimizing systems and processes in engineering-driven industries. This pathway prepares graduates for high-level roles in operations, logistics, and analytics.

Best Scientists Citing Luis C. Dias

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles