World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Liliane Haegeman

Liliane Haegeman

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 55 2003 1815 19 19 207 13936

Liliane Haegeman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Liliane Haegeman between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Liliane Haegeman published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2012. 17 of the 236 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2012. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 2 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 4 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 15 publications
1979 2025

236 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Liliane Haegeman: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 3
1981 1
1982 1
1983 2
1984 6
1985 4
1986 4
1987 4
1988 3
1989 3
1990 4
1991 2
1992 1
1993 4
1994 4
1995 12
1996 2
1997 3
1998 4
1999 5
2000 4
2001 5
2002 2
2003 5
2004 3
2005 3
2006 4
2007 7
2008 3
2009 4
2010 9
2011 5
2012 17
2013 8
2014 14
2015 6
2016 4
2017 7
2018 11
2019 6
2020 6
2021 4
2022 2
2023 7
2024 2
2025 15
Total 236
Download as CSV

Liliane Haegeman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liliane Haegeman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 204–213 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 207 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285 207
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Liliane Haegeman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liliane Haegeman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137 55
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Liliane Haegeman is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has a research profile deeply rooted in the fields of Arts and Humanities, Social Sciences, and Computer Science. Their scholarly work predominantly focuses on the subfields of Language and Linguistics, Linguistics and Language, Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Cultural Studies.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Linguistic Variation and Morphology
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Lexicography and Language Studies
  • Language and cultural evolution
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies

Their recent publications demonstrate a focus on syntactic and grammatical phenomena as well as linguistic variation. Notable papers include:

  • The syntax of peripheral adverbial clauses, 2022, published in Journal of Linguistics
  • Non-temporal dan and the grammar of V2*, 2020, published in Nederlandse taalkunde
  • Notes on Register Variation and Subject Ellipsis in Coordination, 2023, published in Revue roumaine de linguistique

Liliane Haegeman frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field. Notable co-authors who have worked with them on multiple occasions include:

  • Karen De Clercq
  • Andreas Trotzke
  • Manuela Schönenberger
  • Lieven Danckaert
  • Ciro Greco

The venues where Liliane Haegeman has published repeatedly include:

  • Journal of Linguistics
  • Nederlandse taalkunde
  • Revue roumaine de linguistique

Best Publications

  • Introduction to Government and Binding Theory

    Liliane M. V. Haegeman

  • Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective

    Artemis Alexiadou;Liliane M. V. Haegeman;Melita Stavrou

  • Elements of Grammar

    Liliane Haegeman

  • NEGATIVE HEADS AND THE NEG CRITERION

    Liliane Haegeman;Raffaella Zanuttini

  • The Syntax of Negation

    Liliane M. V. Haegeman

  • Elements of Grammar: Handbook In Generative Syntax

    Liliane M. V. Haegeman

  • Conditionals, factives and the left periphery

    Liliane Haegeman

  • English Grammar: A Generative Perspective

    Liliane M. V. Haegeman;Jacqueline Guéron

  • Conditional Clauses: External and Internal Syntax

    Liliane Haegeman

  • Verb Projection Raising, Scope, and the Typology of Rules Affecting Verbs

    Liliane Haegeman;Henk van Riemsdijk

  • The new comparative syntax

    Liliane M. V. Haegeman

  • The internal syntax of adverbial clauses

    Liliane Haegeman

  • Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and the composition of the left periphery

    Liliane M. V. Haegeman

  • The syntacticization of discourse

    Liliane Haegeman;Virginia Hill

  • Negative Concord and (Multiple) Agree: A Case Study of West Flemish

    Liliane Haegeman;Terje Lohndal

  • West flemish verb‐based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer

    Liliane Haegeman

  • Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: A Case Study in West Flemish

    Liliane M. V. Haegeman

  • Referential CPs and DPs: an operator movement account

    Liliane Haegeman;Barbara Ürögdi

  • Root Infinitives, Tense, and Truncated Structures in Dutch

    Liliane Haegeman

  • Parenthetical Adverbials: The Radical Orphanage Approach

    Liliane Haegeman

  • The Movement Derivation of Conditional Clauses

    Liliane Haegeman

  • Unspeakable sentences subject omission in written registers : a cartographic analysis

    Liliane Haegeman

Frequent Co-Authors

Artemis Alexiadou
Artemis Alexiadou Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Luigi Rizzi
Luigi Rizzi University of Siena
Jenny Cheshire
Jenny Cheshire Queen Mary University of London
Gereon Müller
Gereon Müller Leipzig University
Olga Fischer
Olga Fischer University of Amsterdam
Guglielmo Cinque
Guglielmo Cinque Ca Foscari University of Venice
Terttu Nevalainen
Terttu Nevalainen University of Helsinki
Anders Holmberg
Anders Holmberg Newcastle University
Andrew Radford
Andrew Radford University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities offers diverse career opportunities across education, counseling, social work, and mental health services. Popular options include affordable online psychology degrees, which prepare students for roles in therapy, human resources, education, or research. Flexibility is a key benefit, giving learners the chance to balance study with other commitments.

For those interested in direct client work, pursuing a cacrep accredited universities counseling program online ensures you meet rigorous professional and ethical standards. Another pathway is a marriage and family therapy degree online, which opens the door to helping individuals and families navigate relationships and life challenges.

Many students seek programs that are not only reputable but also accessible. Comparing the affordable online psychology degrees makes higher education more attainable. Additionally, social work remains a vital field, and learners can research the easiest msw programs to get into to launch their careers in helping communities and individuals alike.

Best Scientists Citing Liliane Haegeman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles