The chart shows the history of publications by Leonard Pitt between 1958 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Leonard Pitt published across 68 years, from 1958 to 2025, averaging 1.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 1989. 2 of the 78 publications appeared in the last two years.
78 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1958 | 1 |
| 1959 | 0 |
| 1960 | 0 |
| 1961 | 2 |
| 1962 | 0 |
| 1963 | 0 |
| 1964 | 0 |
| 1965 | 0 |
| 1966 | 0 |
| 1967 | 1 |
| 1968 | 0 |
| 1969 | 0 |
| 1970 | 0 |
| 1971 | 0 |
| 1972 | 0 |
| 1973 | 1 |
| 1974 | 0 |
| 1975 | 0 |
| 1976 | 0 |
| 1977 | 2 |
| 1978 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0 |
| 1981 | 1 |
| 1982 | 1 |
| 1983 | 0 |
| 1984 | 3 |
| 1985 | 0 |
| 1986 | 1 |
| 1987 | 5 |
| 1988 | 5 |
| 1989 | 8 |
| 1990 | 7 |
| 1991 | 2 |
| 1992 | 5 |
| 1993 | 4 |
| 1994 | 5 |
| 1995 | 1 |
| 1996 | 2 |
| 1997 | 4 |
| 1998 | 5 |
| 1999 | 1 |
| 2000 | 0 |
| 2001 | 1 |
| 2002 | 0 |
| 2003 | 2 |
| 2004 | 5 |
| 2005 | 1 |
| 2006 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0 |
| 2008 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0 |
| 2010 | 0 |
| 2011 | 0 |
| 2012 | 0 |
| 2013 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0 |
| 2015 | 0 |
| 2016 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0 |
| 2019 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 |
| 2024 | 1 |
| 2025 | 1 |
| Total | 78 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard Pitt sits on this spectrum.
The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists |
|---|---|
| 32–41 | 7 |
| 42–51 | 22 |
| 52–61 | 82 |
| 62–71 | 134 |
| 72–81 | 249 |
| 82–91 | 324 |
| 92–101 | 421 |
| 102–111 | 420 |
| 112–121 | 497 |
| 122–131 | 544 |
| 132–141 | 555 |
| 142–151 | 609 |
| 152–161 | 559 |
| 162–171 | 534 |
| 172–181 | 556 |
| 182–191 | 583 |
| 192–201 | 519 |
| 202–211 | 508 |
| 212–221 | 490 |
| 222–231 | 437 |
| 232–241 | 423 |
| 242–251 | 408 |
| 252–261 | 377 |
| 262–271 | 301 |
| 272–281 | 335 |
| 282–291 | 320 |
| 292–301 | 293 |
| 302–311 | 250 |
| 312–321 | 238 |
| 322–331 | 206 |
| 332–341 | 209 |
| 342–351 | 208 |
| 352–361 | 162 |
| 362–371 | 176 |
| 372–381 | 127 |
| 382–391 | 158 |
| 392–401 | 128 |
| 402–411 | 104 |
| 412–421 | 94 |
| 422–431 | 99 |
| 432–441 | 83 |
| 442–451 | 108 |
| 452–461 | 73 |
| 462–471 | 77 |
| 472–481 | 69 |
| 482–491 | 84 |
| 492–501 | 62 |
| 502–511 | 54 |
| 512–521 | 57 |
| 522–531 | 51 |
| 532–541 | 51 |
| 542–551 | 32 |
| 552–561 | 38 |
| 562–571 | 28 |
| 572–581 | 43 |
| 582–591 | 33 |
| 592–601 | 41 |
| 602–611 | 32 |
| 612–621 | 28 |
| 622–631 | 25 |
| 632–641 | 27 |
| 642–651 | 17 |
| 652–661 | 20 |
| 662–671 | 17 |
| 672–681 | 15 |
| 682–691 | 14 |
| 692–701 | 21 |
| 702–711 | 13 |
| 712–721 | 12 |
| 722–731 | 19 |
| 732–741 | 14 |
| 742–751 | 12 |
| 752–761 | 10 |
| 762–771 | 10 |
| 772–781 | 11 |
| 782–791 | 10 |
| 792–801 | 11 |
| 802–811 | 8 |
| 812–821 | 8 |
| 822–831 | 7 |
| 832–841 | 11 |
| 842–851 | 10 |
| 852–861 | 5 |
| 862–871 | 9 |
| 872–881 | 4 |
| 882–891 | 6 |
| 892–901 | 3 |
| 902–911 | 6 |
| 912–921 | 3 |
| 922–931 | 2 |
| 932–941 | 2 |
| 942–951 | 2 |
| 952–961 | 3 |
| 962–971 | 3 |
| 972–981 | 3 |
| 982–990 | 5 |
| 991+ | 100 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leonard Pitt sits on this spectrum.
The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists |
|---|---|
| 30–31 | 879 |
| 32–33 | 983 |
| 34–35 | 918 |
| 36–37 | 990 |
| 38–39 | 968 |
| 40–41 | 907 |
| 42–43 | 821 |
| 44–45 | 763 |
| 46–47 | 689 |
| 48–49 | 543 |
| 50–51 | 543 |
| 52–53 | 518 |
| 54–55 | 500 |
| 56–57 | 458 |
| 58–59 | 400 |
| 60–61 | 337 |
| 62–63 | 308 |
| 64–65 | 292 |
| 66–67 | 249 |
| 68–69 | 213 |
| 70–71 | 192 |
| 72–73 | 189 |
| 74–75 | 165 |
| 76–77 | 139 |
| 78–79 | 119 |
| 80–81 | 121 |
| 82–83 | 113 |
| 84–85 | 88 |
| 86–87 | 87 |
| 88–89 | 75 |
| 90–91 | 69 |
| 92–93 | 57 |
| 94–95 | 46 |
| 96–97 | 38 |
| 98–99 | 34 |
| 100–101 | 36 |
| 102–103 | 27 |
| 104–105 | 37 |
| 106–107 | 18 |
| 108–109 | 31 |
| 110–111 | 19 |
| 112–113 | 16 |
| 114–115 | 12 |
| 116–117 | 20 |
| 118–119 | 15 |
| 120–121 | 5 |
| 122–123 | 20 |
| 124–125 | 8 |
| 126–127 | 5 |
| 128–129 | 7 |
| 130 | 3 |
| 131+ | 98 |
Leonard Pitt is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in the United States. Their academic profile does not currently list recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, specific fields or subfields of study, or main topics of research.
There is no available information regarding awards won, which might suggest that data on recognitions has not been provided or documented at this time.
The absence of listed publications and research topics limits the detailed analysis of Leonard Pitt's specific contributions or areas of expertise within their broader academic context.
Further data would be necessary to offer a more comprehensive overview of their academic influence, research themes, and possible collaborations across institutions or disciplines.
Leonard Pitt;Leslie G. Valiant
M. Kearns;M. Li;L. Pitt;L. Valiant
Leonard Pitt
Dana Angluin;Michael Frazier;Leonard Pitt
Leonard Pitt;Manfred K. Warmuth
Leonard Pitt;Manfred K. Warmuth
Raymond Board;Leonard Pitt
Michael Kearns;Ming Li;Leonard Pitt;Leslie G. Valiant
Nina Mishra;Dan Oblinger;Leonard Pitt
L. Pitt;M. K. Warmuth
L. Pitt
Leonard Pitt;Carl H. Smith
Michael Kearns;Leonard Pitt
L. Pitt;M.K. Warmuth
Michael Frazier;Leonard Pitt
Carlos Domingo;Nina Mishra;Leonard Pitt
L. Pitt
H. Aizenstein;L. Pitt
Michael Frazier;Leonard Pitt
Leonard Pitt;Manfred K. Warmuth
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring related fields and online study options expands your opportunities in Computer Science and similar disciplines. Many students are interested in pursuing cheap online degrees fast to kickstart their careers without breaking the bank or spending years in school. These programs offer flexibility and affordability, making education accessible for a wider range of learners.
If your previous academic performance is a concern, it's encouraging to know there are online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa. These options give a second chance to learners determined to advance regardless of past grades.
Computer Science skills are highly transferable, and you might also consider bridging into other fields. For example, a strong technology background can pair well with environmental science. To explore this path, see what kinds of jobs for environmental science majors are out there—many roles value computational and analytical expertise.
If speeding up your education is a priority, check out the top online computer science degree programs that offer accelerated pathways. These can help you reach your goals faster and with greater flexibility.