World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
37
Citations
4966
World Ranking
6914
National Ranking
2328

Larry J. Gut publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Larry J. Gut sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 155 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Larry J. Gut D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Larry J. Gut sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Larry J. Gut was affiliated with Michigan State University in the United States and conducted extensive research primarily in agricultural and biological sciences. Their work focused on various aspects of insect science, with particular attention to insect behavior, pest control techniques, and insect-plant interactions.

The scientist contributed significantly to subfields including insect science, plant science, ecology, evolution, behavior, systematics, and cell biology. Their research topics centered on insect behavior and control techniques, insect-plant interactions and control, insect and pesticide research, plant and animal studies, insect pest control strategies, forest insect ecology and management, and insect pheromone research and control.

Larry J. Gut published numerous papers, with key recent works including:

  • "Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators," 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): A Decade of Research Towards a Sustainable Integrated Pest Management Program," 2021, Journal of Economic Entomology
  • "CropPol: A dynamic, open and global database on crop pollination," 2021, Ecology
  • "Responding to the US national pollinator plan: a case study in Michigan," 2021, Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
  • "Evaluating invasion risk and population dynamics of the brown marmorated stink bug across the contiguous United States," 2022, Pest Management Science

Their frequent collaborators included John C. Wise, Celeste E Wheeler, Anthony H. VanWoerkom, Julianna K. Wilson, and Juan Huang. Collaborations with these researchers spanned multiple projects and publications, reflecting interdisciplinary engagement within the field.

Throughout their career, Larry J. Gut published regularly in several established academic venues. These included:

  • Arthropod Management Tests
  • Journal of Economic Entomology
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Ecology
  • Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment

This body of work contributed to a deeper understanding of insect pest management, pollination issues, and integrated pest management strategies, particularly within the context of agricultural productivity in the United States. Larry J. Gut's research included empirical studies on insect population dynamics and ecosystem impacts, reflecting a comprehensive scope ranging from basic insect science to applied entomology.

Best Publications

  • Codling Moth Management and Chemical Ecology

    Peter Witzgall;Lukasz Stelinski;Larry Gut;Don Thomson

  • Crop production in the USA is frequently limited by a lack of pollinators.

    J R Reilly;D R Artz;D Biddinger;K Bobiwash;K Bobiwash

  • Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae): A Decade of Research Towards a Sustainable Integrated Pest Management Program

    Gabriella Tait;Serhan Mermer;Dara Stockton;Jana Lee

  • Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (part 2): Case studies.

    J. R. Miller;L. J. Gut;F. M. de Lame;L. L. Stelinski

  • Mating Disruption for the 21st Century: Matching Technology with Mechanism

    James R. Miller;Larry J. Gut

  • Trap Designs for Monitoring Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae)

    Jana C. Lee;Peter W. Shearer;Luz D. Barrantes;Elizabeth H. Beers

  • Resistance of codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), larvae in Michigan to insecticides with different modes of action and the impact on field residual activity.

    Unknown

  • Differentiation of Competitive vs. Non-competitive Mechanisms Mediating Disruption of Moth Sexual Communication by Point Sources of Sex Pheromone (Part 2): Case Studies

    Unknown

  • Effects of Broad-Spectrum Insecticides on Epigeal Arthropod Biodiversity in Pacific Northwest Apple Orchards

    Unknown

  • Does Passive Sampling Accurately Reflect the Bee (Apoidea: Anthophila) Communities Pollinating Apple and Sour Cherry Orchards?

    Jason Gibbs;Jason Gibbs;Neelendra K. Joshi;Neelendra K. Joshi;Julianna K. Wilson;Nikki L. Rothwell

  • General principles of attraction and competitive attraction as revealed by large-cage studies of moths responding to sex pheromone

    J. R. Miller;P. S. McGhee;P. Y. Siegert;C. G. Adams

  • Season-long mating disruption of Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) by one machine application of pheromone in wax drops (SPLAT-OFM)

    L. L. Stelinski;L. L. Stelinski;J. R. Miller;R. Ledebuhr;P. Siegert

  • Lethal and sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole on three species of Rhagoletis fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae).

    Luis A. F. Teixeira;Larry J. Gut;John C. Wise;Rufus Isaacs

  • Increased EAG responses of tortricid moths after prolonged exposure to plant volatiles: evidence for octopamine-mediated sensitization.

    Lukasz L. Stelinski;James R. Miller;Noah E. Ressa;Larry J. Gut

  • Presence of long-lasting peripheral adaptation in oblique-banded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana and absence of such adaptation in redbanded leafroller, Argyrotaenia velutinana.

    Lukasz L. Stelinski;James R. Miller;Larry J. Gut

  • Antennal and Behavioral Responses of Virgin and Mated Oriental Fruit Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Females to Their Sex Pheromone

    L. L. Stelinski;A. L. Il’ichev;L. J. Gut

  • Perspectives on Arthropod Community Structure, Organization, and Development in Agricultural Crops

    Unknown

  • Small Plot Trials Documenting Effective Mating Disruption of Oriental Fruit Moth by Using High Densities of Wax-Drop Pheromone Dispensers

    L. L. Stelinski;L. J. Gut;R. E. Mallinger;D. Epstein

  • Higher Densities of Distributed Pheromone Sources Provide Disruption of Codling Moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Superior to That of Lower Densities of Clumped Sources

    D. L. Epstein;L. L. Stelinski;T. P. Reed;J. R. Miller

  • Season-Long Monitoring of the Brown Marmorated Stink Bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) Throughout the United States Using Commercially Available Traps and Lures.

    Angelita L. Acebes-Doria;Arthur M. Agnello;Diane G. Alston;Heather Andrews

  • Concentration of air‐borne pheromone required for long‐lasting peripheral adaptation in the obliquebanded leafroller, Choristoneura rosaceana

    Lukasz L. Stelinski;Larry J. Gut;James R. Miller

  • Geographic Variation in Pheromone Chemistry, Antennal Electrophysiology, and Pheromone-Mediated Trap Catch of North American Populations of the Obliquebanded Leafroller

    A.M. El-Sayed;J. Delisle;N. De Lury;L.J. Gut

  • Alightment of Spotted Wing Drosophila (Diptera: Drosophilidae) on Odorless Disks Varying in Color.

    D. M. Kirkpatrick;P. S. McGhee;S. L. Hermann;L. J. Gut

  • Mismatched outcomes for biodiversity and ecosystem services: testing the responses of crop pollinators and wild bee biodiversity to habitat enhancement.

    Charlie C. Nicholson;Charlie C. Nicholson;Kimiora L. Ward;Neal M. Williams;Rufus Isaacs

  • Estimating Monitoring Trap Plume Reach and Trapping Area for Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in Michigan Tart Cherry.

    Danielle M Kirkpatrick;Larry J Gut;James R Miller

  • Improving monitoring tools for spotted wing drosophila, Drosophila suzukii

    D.M. Kirkpatrick;P.S. McGhee;L.J. Gut;J.R. Miller

  • Maximizing Information Yield From Pheromone-Baited Monitoring Traps: Estimating Plume Reach, Trapping Radius, and Absolute Density of Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in Michigan Apple

    C. G. Adams;J. H. Schenker;P. S. McGhee;L. J. Gut

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Miller
James R. Miller University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Rufus Isaacs
Rufus Isaacs Michigan State University
Jason Gibbs
Jason Gibbs University of Manitoba
Frank G. Zalom
Frank G. Zalom University of California, Davis
Cesar Rodriguez-Saona
Cesar Rodriguez-Saona Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jeffrey L. Feder
Jeffrey L. Feder University of Notre Dame
Vaughn M. Walton
Vaughn M. Walton Oregon State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in applying your passion for Ecology and Evolution to various career paths, online degrees offer flexible entry points in specialized fields. For example, students considering healthcare can explore asha online slp programs, which provide accelerated routes to speech-language pathology while meeting important professional standards. These options are especially valuable for those aiming to make a quick transition into clinical roles.

Non-majors looking to pivot into new areas may benefit from structured online bridge programs non-SLP majors. Such programs help students bridge academic gaps and prepare for graduate study or certification in new disciplines. For those interested in nursing, pursuing one of the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs offers an affordable and fast track to a rewarding healthcare career.

As you plan your path, it’s important to consider long-term outcomes, including salary and job growth. For instance, reviewing current dnp pmhnp salary data can provide insight into advanced nursing careers. By exploring these related online degrees and career pathways, you can discover versatile opportunities in science, healthcare, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Larry J. Gut

Recently Published Articles