World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
37
Citations
5037
World Ranking
6911
National Ranking
434

Landis Hare publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Landis Hare sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 92 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Landis Hare D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Landis Hare sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Landis Hare is affiliated with the Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique in Canada.

They have no publicly listed recent papers or documented frequent co-authors.

There is no available information regarding frequent publication venues, book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or main topics of work associated with this researcher.

There are no records of awards or honors linked to their academic career.

Best Publications

  • Aquatic insects and trace metals: bioavailability, bioaccumulation, and toxicity.

    Landis Hare

  • Influence of lake chemistry and fish age on cadmium, copper, and zinc concentrations in various organs of indigenous yellow perch (Perca flavescens)

    Anik Giguere;Peter G. C. Campbell;Landis Hare;D. Gordon Mcdonald

  • A field study of metal toxicity and accumulation by benthic invertebrates; implications for the acid-volatile sulfide (AVS) model

    Landis Hare;Richard Carignan;Miguel A. Huerta-Diaz

  • Relative importance of water and food as cadmium sources to an aquatic insect (Chaoborus punctipennis) : Implications for predicting Cd bioaccumulation in nature

    Catherine Munger;Landis Hare

  • Steady-state distribution of metals among metallothionein and other cytosolic ligands and links to cytotoxicity in bivalves living along a polymetallic gradient.

    Anik Giguère;Yves Couillard;Peter G.C Campbell;Olivier Perceval

  • Dynamics of Cd, Cu and Zn accumulation in organs and sub-cellular fractions in field transplanted juvenile yellow perch (Perca flavescens).

    Lisa D. Kraemer;Peter G.C. Campbell;Landis Hare

  • Sub-cellular partitioning of cadmium, copper, nickel and zinc in indigenous yellow perch (Perca flavescens) sampled along a polymetallic gradient.

    Anik Giguère;Peter G.C. Campbell;Landis Hare;Patrice Couture

  • Cadmium-handling strategies in two chronically exposed indigenous freshwater organisms--the yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and the floater mollusc (Pyganodon grandis).

    Peter G.C. Campbell;Anik Giguère;Emmanuelle Bonneris;Emmanuelle Bonneris;Landis Hare

  • Gut sediments in a burrowing mayfly (Ephemeroptera, Hexagenia limbata): their contribution to animal trace element burdens, their removal, and the efficacy of a correction for their presence

    Landis Hare;Peter G. C. Campbell;André Tessier;Nelson Belzile

  • Sub-cellular partitioning of Cd, Cu and Zn in tissues of indigenous unionid bivalves living along a metal exposure gradient and links to metal-induced effects.

    Emmanuelle Bonneris;Olivier Perceval;Stéphane Masson;Landis Hare

  • Oxygen measurements in the burrows of freshwater insects

    Feiyue Wang;André Tessier;Landis Hare

  • Sulphur stable isotopes can distinguish trophic dependence on sediments and plankton in boreal lakes

    Louis Croisetière;Landis Hare;André Tessier;Gilbert Cabana

  • Trace Element Distributions in Aquatic Insects: Variations among Genera, Elements, and Lakes

    Landis Hare;André Tessier;Peter G. C. Campbell

  • Experimental evidence for cadmium uptake via calcium channels in the aquatic insect Chironomus staegeri

    Albert Craig;Landis Hare;André Tessier

  • Dynamics of Cadmium, Lead, and Zinc Exchange between Nymphs of the Burrowing Mayfly Hexagenia rigida (Ephemeroptera) and the Environment

    Landis Hare;Erwan Saouter;Peter G. C. Campbell;André Tessier

  • Cadmium accumulation by invertebrates living at the sediment-water interface.

    Landis Hare;André Tessier;Lesley Warren

  • Sub-cellular partitioning of metals (Cd, Cu, Zn) in the gills of a freshwater bivalve, Pyganodon grandis: role of calcium concretions in metal sequestration.

    Emmanuelle Bonneris;Anik Giguère;Olivier Perceval;Thierry Buronfosse

  • Metal Sources for Freshwater Invertebrates: Pertinence for Risk Assessment

    Landis Hare;André Tessier;Uwe Borgmann

  • Cadmium accumulation and metallothionein synthesis in freshwater bivalves (Pyganodon grandis): relative influence of the metal exposure gradient versus limnological variability

    O Perceval;B Pinel-Alloul;G Méthot;Y Couillard

  • Subcellular Distribution of Cadmium and Nickel in Chronically Exposed Wild Fish: Inferences Regarding Metal Detoxification Strategies and Implications for Setting Water Quality Guidelines for Dissolved Metals

    Peter G. C. Campbell;Lisa D. Kraemer;Anik Giguère;Landis Hare

  • Temporal variations of trace metals in aquatic insects

    Landis Hare;Peter G.C. Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

André Tessier
André Tessier University of Quebec
Peter G. C. Campbell
Peter G. C. Campbell Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Marc Amyot
Marc Amyot University of Montreal
Bernadette Pinel-Alloul
Bernadette Pinel-Alloul University of Montreal
Alain Boudou
Alain Boudou University of Bordeaux
Richard Carignan
Richard Carignan University of Montreal
Magalie Baudrimont
Magalie Baudrimont Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Wen-Xiong Wang
Wen-Xiong Wang City University of Hong Kong
Nelson Belzile
Nelson Belzile Laurentian University
Colin R. Janssen
Colin R. Janssen Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students intrigued by Ecology and Evolution, there are many online degree options that support diverse career avenues in science and healthcare. Increasingly, universities are offering flexible pathways that can help you transition quickly from an associate to a master’s level qualification, opening doors to both research and applied roles.

Some programs, like the 6-month rn to bsn program, enable registered nurses to fast-track their careers by earning higher credentials in less time. Others provide bridges for those with different backgrounds, such as the asn to fnp programs, which are designed for nurses targeting advanced practice specialties.

If you’re not originally from a nursing or science field, options like the online direct entry msn allow non-nurses to quickly gain entry into the healthcare sector. When comparing universities, reviewing head-to-heads such as capella vs wgu rn to bsn can help you select the right program based on cost, flexibility, and program reputation.

These online pathways make it easier for passionate learners to blend their interests in ecology, health, and innovation—paving the way for meaningful contributions in research, healthcare, and environmental science.

Best Scientists Citing Landis Hare

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles