World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
37
Citations
12360
World Ranking
1910
National Ranking
782

Kevin Linderman publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin Linderman sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 102 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Kevin Linderman D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kevin Linderman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kevin Linderman is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and has a research focus within the field of Business, Management and Accounting. Their work spans several subfields including Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems, Marketing, Economics and Econometrics, as well as Radiological and Ultrasound Technology.

The scientist's research covers a range of main topics, with a concentration on quality and supply management, supply chain resilience and risk management, innovation and knowledge management, sustainable supply chain management, environmental sustainability in business, occupational health and safety research, and construction project management and performance.

Recent publications demonstrate a focus on both supply chain dynamics and innovation. Notable papers include:

  • Supply network resilience learning: An exploratory data analytics study (2021) in Decision Sciences
  • Six Sigma and operational absorptive capacity: the role of project leader (2020) in Total Quality Management & Business Excellence
  • Government support and cross-border innovation: The effect of China's innovative city policy on Chinese firms' patenting in the United States (2023) in Production and Operations Management
  • Resource-Based Product and Process Innovation Model: Theory Development and Empirical Validation (2020) in Sustainability
  • Leadership styles in supply chain disruptions: a multimethod evaluation based on practitioner insights (2021) in International Journal of Operations & Production Management

Frequent collaborators in their research include Kedong Chen, Hung-Chung Su, Young Sik Cho, Yuhong Li, and Xun Tong. These collaborations indicate ongoing partnerships with researchers experienced in operations and management disciplines.

Kevin Linderman publishes regularly in key academic venues such as the Journal of Operations Management, SSRN Electronic Journal, Decision Sciences, Academy of Management Proceedings, and Production and Operations Management. These journals reflect the broad applicability of their work to both theoretical and applied aspects of operations and management research.

Best Publications

  • Six Sigma: A goal-theoretic perspective

    Kevin Linderman;Roger G. Schroeder;Srilata Zaheer;Adrian S. Choo

  • Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory

    Roger G Schroeder;Kevin Linderman;Charles Liedtke;Adrian S Choo

  • Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory

    Roger G. Schroeder;Kevin Linderman;Charles Liedtke;Adrian S. Choo

  • Supply network disruption and resilience: A network structural perspective

    Yusoon Kim;Yusoon Kim;Yi Su Chen;Yi Su Chen;Kevin Linderman;Kevin Linderman

  • Integrating quality management practices with knowledge creation processes

    Kevin Linderman;Roger G. Schroeder;Srilata Zaheer;Charles Liedtke

  • The globalization of operations in Eastern and Western countries: Unpacking the relationship between national and organizational culture and its impact on manufacturing performance

    Michael Naor;Kevin Linderman;Roger Schroeder

  • The Role of Culture as Driver of Quality Management and Performance: Infrastructure Versus Core Quality Practices*

    Michael Naor;Susan M. Goldstein;Kevin W. Linderman;Roger G. Schroeder

  • The effect of environmental complexity and environmental dynamism on lean practices

    Arash Azadegan;Pankaj C. Patel;Abouzar Zangoueinezhad;Kevin Linderman

  • The effect of environmental complexity and environmental dynamism on lean practices

    Arash Azadegan;Pankaj C. Patel;Abouzar Zangoueinezhad;Kevin Linderman

  • In pursuit of implementation patterns: the context of Lean and Six Sigma

    Rachna Shah;A. Chandrasekaran;Kevin W Linderman

  • Method and context perspectives on learning and knowledge creation in quality management

    Adrian S. Choo;Kevin W. Linderman;Roger G. Schroeder

  • The moderating role of contextual factors on quality management practices

    Dongli Zhang;Kevin Linderman;Rober G. Schroeder

  • The moderating role of contextual factors on quality management practices

    Dongli Zhang;Kevin Linderman;Roger G. Schroeder

  • Method and Psychological Effects on Learning Behaviors and Knowledge Creation in Quality Improvement Projects

    Adrian S. Choo;Kevin W. Linderman;Roger G. Schroeder

  • Six Sigma: The role of goals in improvement teams

    Kevin Linderman;Roger G. Schroeder;Adrian S. Choo

  • Antecedents to ambidexterity competency in high technology organizations

    Aravind Chandrasekaran;Kevin Linderman;Roger Schroeder

  • An integrated systems approach to process control and maintenance

    Kevin W. Linderman;Kathleen E. McKone-Sweet;John C. Anderson

  • System dynamics perspectives and modeling opportunities for research in operations management

    John Sterman;Rogelio Oliva;Kevin Linderman;Elliot Bendoly

  • A competitive advantage from the implementation timing of ISO management standards

    Hung Chung Su;Suvrat Dhanorkar;Kevin Linderman

  • Performance effects of early and late Six Sigma adoptions

    Brian W. Jacobs;Morgan Swink;Kevin Linderman

  • A Knowledge Framework Underlying Process Management

    Kevin W. Linderman;Roger G. Schroeder;Janine Sanders

  • Evolution of Quality: First Fifty Issues of Production and Operations Management

    Roger G. Schroeder;Kevin W Linderman;Dongli Zhang

  • Method and psychological effects on learning behaviors and knowledge creation in quality improvement projects

    Roger G Schroeder;Kevin W Linderman;Adrian S Choo

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger G. Schroeder
Roger G. Schroeder University of Minnesota
Elliot Bendoly
Elliot Bendoly The Ohio State University
Srilata Zaheer
Srilata Zaheer University of Minnesota
Jiju Antony
Jiju Antony Northumbria University
Pankaj C. Patel
Pankaj C. Patel Villanova University
T.C.E. Cheng
T.C.E. Cheng Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Morgan Swink
Morgan Swink Texas Christian University
Sarv Devaraj
Sarv Devaraj University of Notre Dame
Kee-hung Lai
Kee-hung Lai Hong Kong Polytechnic University

External Links

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Business and Management offers flexibility, affordability, and a range of career options. Students looking for rapid entry into the workforce should consider the fastest degree completion programs that allow accelerated learning and quick graduation.

Accreditation is vital for an online business degree. Accredited programs guarantee quality, recognition, and better job prospects. Browse through various online business degree programs accredited to find affordable and reputable options that match your goals.

For those interested in the healthcare sector, a bachelors in healthcare administration is a valuable option. This degree prepares graduates for management roles within hospitals, insurance companies, and healthcare organizations.

Advancing further, a Master of Healthcare Administration can boost earning potential and bring leadership opportunities. Cost-conscious students may want to explore cheap mha programs that offer both flexibility and an accredited curriculum.

Best Scientists Citing Kevin Linderman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles