World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
39
Citations
6036
World Ranking
8353
National Ranking
2981

Kendra L. Daly publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kendra L. Daly sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 130 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Kendra L. Daly D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kendra L. Daly sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Kendra L. Daly is affiliated with the University of South Florida in the United States. Their research expertise spans primarily within the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work frequently focuses on subfields including Oceanography, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Pollution, and Environmental Chemistry.

The scientist's main topics of study cover Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation, Marine Animal Studies Overview, Arctic and Antarctic Ice Dynamics, Marine and Fisheries Research, Ocean Acidification Effects and Responses, Marine and Coastal Ecosystems, and Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics.

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Kendra L. Daly are:

  • "Status, Change, and Futures of Zooplankton in the Southern Ocean" (2022), published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
  • "Marine phytoplankton responses to oil and dispersant exposures: Knowledge gained since the Deepwater Horizon oil spill" (2021), published in Marine Pollution Bulletin
  • "The science behind marine-oil snow and MOSSFA: Past, present, and future" (2020), published in Progress In Oceanography
  • "Drivers of concentrated predation in an Antarctic marginal-ice-zone food web" (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • "Resilience of the zooplankton community in the northeast Gulf of Mexico during and after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill" (2020), published in Marine Pollution Bulletin

Kendra L. Daly has collaborated frequently with colleagues such as David G. Ainley, Grant Ballard, Andrew Remsen, Antonietta Quigg, and Jeffrey P. Chanton.

Their publications have appeared primarily in venues including Marine Pollution Bulletin, Frontiers in Marine Science, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Progress In Oceanography, and Scientific Reports.

In recognition of their contributions, the scientist was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2015.

Best Publications

  • An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean

    Benjamin S. Halpern;Catherine Longo;Darren Hardy;Karen L. McLeod

  • Overwintering development, growth, and feeding of larval Euphausia superba in the Antarctic marginal ice zone

    Kendra L. Daly

  • Assessing the Impacts of Oil-associated Marine Snow Formation and Sedimentation during and after the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

    Kendra L. Daly;Uta Passow;Jeffrey Chanton;David Hollander

  • Did the northeastern Gulf of Mexico become greener after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill

    Chuanmin Hu;Robert H. Weisberg;Yonggang Liu;Lianyuan Zheng

  • Abundance and distribution of krill in the ice edge zone of the Weddell Sea, austral spring 1983

    Kendra L. Daly;Michael C. Macaulay

  • Overwintering growth and development of larval Euphausia superba: an interannual comparison under varying environmental conditions west of the Antarctic Peninsula

    Kendra L. Daly

  • Detecting marine hazardous substances and organisms: sensors for pollutants, toxins, and pathogens

    Oliver Zielinski;Julia A. Busch;Allan D. Cembella;Kendra L. Daly

  • Influence of Physical and Biological Mesoscale Dynamics on the Seasonal Distribution and Behavior of Euphausia superba in the Antarctic Marginal Ice Zone

    Kendra L. Daly;Michael C. Macaulay

  • Zooplankton in the Eastern Tropical North Pacific: Boundary Effects of Oxygen Minimum Zone Expansion

    Karen F. Wishner;Dawn M. Outram;Brad A. Seibel;Kendra L. Daly

  • Validation of SeaWiFS chlorophyll a concentrations in the Southern Ocean: A revisit

    Marina Marrari;Chuanmin Hu;Kendra Daly

  • Impacts of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill evaluated using an end-to-end ecosystem model

    Cameron H. Ainsworth;Claire B. Paris;Natalie Perlin;Lindsey N. Dornberger

  • PHYSICAL-BIOLOGICAL INTERACTIONS INFLUENCING MARINE PLANKTON PRODUCTION

    Kendra L. Daly;Walker O. Smith

  • Toxicity and Mutagenicity of Gulf of Mexico Waters During and After the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

    John H. Paul;David J. Hollander;Paula G. Coble;Kendra L. Daly

  • Developing integrated models of Southern Ocean food webs: Including ecological complexity, accounting for uncertainty and the importance of scale

    E.J. Murphy;R.D. Cavanagh;E.E. Hofmann;S.L. Hill

  • Advection in polar and sub-polar environments: Impacts on high latitude marine ecosystems

    George L. Hunt;Kenneth F. Drinkwater;Kevin Arrigo;Jørgen Berge

  • Future marine zooplankton research-a perspective

    U. Bathmann;M. H. Bundy;M. E. Clarke;T. J. Cowles

  • Spatial and temporal variability of SeaWiFS chlorophyll a distributions west of the Antarctic Peninsula: Implications for krill production

    Marina Marrari;Kendra L. Daly;Chuanmin Hu

  • KRILLBASE: a circumpolar database of Antarctic krill and salp numerical densities, 1926–2016

    Angus Atkinson;Simeon L Hill;Evgeny A Pakhomov;Volker Siegel

  • Phytoplankton Assemblage Structure and Primary Productivity Along 170° W in the South Pacific Ocean

    Giacomo R. DiTullio;Mark E. Geesey;David R. Jones;Kendra L. Daly

  • Status, Change, and Futures of Zooplankton in the Southern Ocean

    Unknown

  • Non-Redfield carbon and nitrogen cycling in the Arctic: Effects of ecosystem structure and dynamics

    Kendra L. Daly;Douglas W. R. Wallace;Walker O. Smith;Annelie Skoog

Frequent Co-Authors

Grant Ballard
Grant Ballard Point Blue Conservation Science
Walker O. Smith
Walker O. Smith Shanghai Jiao Tong University
David G. Ainley
David G. Ainley H.T. Harvey & Associates
Eileen E. Hofmann
Eileen E. Hofmann Old Dominion University
John M. Klinck
John M. Klinck Old Dominion University
Joseph J. Torres
Joseph J. Torres University of South Florida
David J. Hollander
David J. Hollander University of South Florida
Chuanmin Hu
Chuanmin Hu University of South Florida St. Petersburg
Uta Passow
Uta Passow Memorial University of Newfoundland
Giacomo R. DiTullio
Giacomo R. DiTullio College of Charleston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which benefit from complementary knowledge in public administration, sociology, and education. For professionals aiming to enhance their leadership skills in environmental policy or non-profit management, exploring the best online MPA programs can be a strategic move. These programs equip students with administrative expertise critical for driving sustainable initiatives within governmental and private sectors.

Understanding the social dynamics related to environmental issues is equally important. Pursuing an online bachelors degree programs in sociology provides insights into human behavior, community impact, and social justice, enriching one’s approach to environmental challenges.

For those interested in advanced research or higher education roles, flexible options like online doctoral programs without dissertation offer a practical pathway to attain doctoral credentials without the traditional dissertation requirement. These programs are ideal for professionals balancing careers while advancing academically.

Additionally, individuals focused on educational leadership can benefit from the best EdS to EdD programs, which facilitate progression from specialist to doctorate levels, emphasizing policy, curriculum development, and administration in environmental education settings.

Best Scientists Citing Kendra L. Daly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles