World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hans-Peter Lenhof

Hans-Peter Lenhof

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
6526
World Ranking
9327
National Ranking
460

Hans-Peter Lenhof publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Peter Lenhof sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 122 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Hans-Peter Lenhof D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hans-Peter Lenhof sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hans-Peter Lenhof is affiliated with Saarland University in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Oncology, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their research encompasses several key topics, including:

  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • MicroRNA in disease regulation
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • RNA Interference and Gene Delivery

Among the recent publications attributed to Hans-Peter Lenhof are:

  • miRTargetLink 2.0-interactive miRNA target gene and target pathway networks (2021, Nucleic Acids Research)
  • Evaluating the Use of Circulating MicroRNA Profiles for Lung Cancer Detection in Symptomatic Patients (2020, JAMA Oncology)
  • GeneTrail 3: advanced high-throughput enrichment analysis (2020, Nucleic Acids Research)
  • Validation of human microRNA target pathways enables evaluation of target prediction tools (2020, Nucleic Acids Research)
  • Wrinkle in the plan: miR-34a-5p impacts chemokine signaling by modulating CXCL10/CXCL11/CXCR3-axis in CD4+, CD8+ T cells, and M1 macrophages (2020, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer)

Frequent co-authors of Hans-Peter Lenhof are:

  • Tim Kehl
  • Lea Eckhart
  • Eckart Meese
  • Andreas Keller
  • Kerstin Lenhof

Lenhof's work has appeared mostly in venues such as:

  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • Scientific Reports
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics
  • Nature Communications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • An estimate of the total number of true human miRNAs.

    Alles J;Fehlmann T;Fischer U;Backes C

  • GeneTrail—advanced gene set enrichment analysis

    Christina Backes;Andreas Keller;Jan Kuentzer;Benny Kneissl

  • A new Lamarckian genetic algorithm for flexible ligand‐receptor docking

    Jan Fuhrmann;Alexander Rurainski;Hans-Peter Lenhof;Dirk Neumann

  • An integer linear programming approach for finding deregulated subgraphs in regulatory networks

    Christina Backes;Alexander Rurainski;Gunnar W. Klau;Oliver Müller

  • miRPathDB 2.0: a novel release of the miRNA Pathway Dictionary Database.

    Tim Kehl;Fabian Kern;Christina Backes;Tobias Fehlmann

  • miRNAs in lung cancer - Studying complex fingerprints in patient's blood cells by microarray experiments

    Andreas Keller;Petra Leidinger;Anne Borries;Anke Wendschlag

  • q-gram based database searching using a suffix array (QUASAR)

    Stefan Burkhardt;Andreas Crauser;Paolo Ferragina;Hans-Peter Lenhof

  • miRTargetLink 2.0-interactive miRNA target gene and target pathway networks

    Fabian Kern;Ernesto Aparicio-Puerta;Yongping Li;Tobias Fehlmann

  • High-throughput miRNA profiling of human melanoma blood samples

    Petra Leidinger;Andreas Keller;Anne Borries;Jörg Reichrath

  • About miRNAs, miRNA seeds, target genes and target pathways.

    Tim Kehl;Christina Backes;Fabian Kern;Tobias Fehlmann

  • Stable serum miRNA profiles as potential tool for non-invasive lung cancer diagnosis.

    Andreas Keller;Petra Leidinger;Randi Elin Gislefoss;Aage Haugen

  • Multi-omics enrichment analysis using the GeneTrail2 web service

    Daniel Stöckel;Tim Kehl;Patrick Trampert;Lara Schneider

  • GraBCas: a bioinformatics tool for score-based prediction of Caspase- and Granzyme B-cleavage sites in protein sequences

    Christina Backes;Jan Kuentzer;Hans-Peter Lenhof;Nicole Comtesse

  • BALL - Rapid Software Prototyping in Computational Molecular Biology

    Oliver Kohlbacher;Hans-Peter Lenhof

  • EDISON-WMW: Exact Dynamic Programing Solution of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney Test.

    Alexander Marx;Christina Backes;Eckart Meese;Hans-Peter Lenhof

  • Static and dynamic algorithms for k -point clustering problems

    Amitava Datta;Hans-Peter Lenhof;Christian Schwarz;Michiel Smid

  • miRPathDB: a new dictionary on microRNAs and target pathways.

    Christina Backes;Tim Kehl;Daniel Stöckel;Tobias Fehlmann

  • Evaluating the Use of Circulating MicroRNA Profiles for Lung Cancer Detection in Symptomatic Patients.

    Tobias Fehlmann;Mustafa Kahraman;Nicole Ludwig;Christina Backes

  • Phylogenomics with paralogs

    Marc Hellmuth;Nicolas Wieseke;Marcus Lechner;Hans-Peter Lenhof

  • miRCarta: a central repository for collecting miRNA candidates

    Christina Backes;Tobias Fehlmann;Fabian Kern;Tim Kehl

  • A combinatorial approach to protein docking with flexible side chains.

    Ernst Althaus;Oliver Kohlbacher;Hans-Peter Lenhof;Peter Müller

  • GeneTrailExpress: a web-based pipeline for the statistical evaluation of microarray experiments.

    Andreas Keller;Christina Backes;Maher Al-Awadhi;Andreas Gerasch

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Keller
Andreas Keller Saarland University
Eckart Meese
Eckart Meese Saarland University
Christina Backes
Christina Backes Saarland University
Oliver Kohlbacher
Oliver Kohlbacher University of Tübingen
Michiel Smid
Michiel Smid Carleton University
Norbert Graf
Norbert Graf Saarland University
Michael Kaufmann
Michael Kaufmann University of Tübingen
Knut Reinert
Knut Reinert Freie Universität Berlin
Manfred Gessler
Manfred Gessler University of Würzburg
Martin Vingron
Martin Vingron Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your skills in computer science can open the door to many related fields and career options. For those seeking a broad science foundation, consider exploring online physics degrees, which provide flexible and affordable routes into technical industries.

Data science continues to grow in demand, with many universities now offering flexible, affordable routes to specialization. If you’re interested in analytics or artificial intelligence, look into the cheapest data science masters in usa to maximize your return on investment.

Engineering skills are also highly sought after, and many schools now feature remote learning options. For students considering the financial aspect, compare electrical engineering online tuition costs to find a program that fits your budget.

For a quicker entry into tech, short-term credentials can boost employment prospects. Explore easy licenses and certifications to get if you wish to enhance your skills and earning potential in less time.

Best Scientists Citing Hans-Peter Lenhof

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles