World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
35
Citations
5678
World Ranking
758
National Ranking
28

Keith Jacobs publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Jacobs sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 294 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Keith Jacobs D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Jacobs sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Keith Jacobs is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on the social sciences, with significant contributions to economics, econometrics, and finance. This work engages particularly with topics at the intersection of housing, finance, and neoliberalism, as well as housing market dynamics and economics.

Their body of work spans across several key themes including urban planning and governance, political and economic history of the UK and US, participatory visual research methods, and intersections between art therapy and mental health.

Recent publications by Keith Jacobs include:

  • What future for public housing? A critical analysis, 2024, published in eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)
  • Political economy perspectives and their relevance for contemporary housing studies, 2022, published in Housing Studies

Keith Jacobs frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including Kathleen Flanagan, Rowland Atkinson, Terry Burke, Kathy Arthurson, and Jeff Malpas. These collaborations have contributed to research outputs across various facets of housing studies and related social science disciplines.

The venues where Keith Jacobs has commonly published are:

  • Housing Studies
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania)
  • AHURI Final Report
  • Housing Theory and Society
  • Qualitative Research

Their research is characterized by multidisciplinary approaches covering sociology, political science, finance, urban studies, economics, econometrics, and demography. They hold a notable presence in housing-related discourse, with extensive work on neoliberal influences on housing finance and policy.

Best Publications

  • Housing and Social Theory

    Unknown

  • Discourse Analysis and its Utility for Urban Policy Research

    Keith Jacobs

  • Evaluating the Social Constructionist Paradigm in Housing Research

    Keith Jacobs;Tony Manzi

  • Conceptualising and measuring the housing affordability problem

    Michelle Gabriel;Keith Jacobs;Kathy Arthurson;Terry Burke

  • Conceptualising and measuring the housing affordability problem: National Research Venture 3: Housing Affordability for Lower Income Australians: research paper 1

    Michelle Gabriel;Keith Jacobs;Kathy Arthurson;Terry Burke

  • Power, discursive space and institutional practices in the construction of housing problems

    Keith Jacobs;Jim Kemeny;Tony Manzi

  • the struggle to define homelessness: a constructivist approach

    Jim Kemeny;Keith Jacobs;Tony Manzi

  • Discourse and policy change: The significance of language for housing research

    Keith Jacobs;Tony Manzi

  • Social constructionism in housing research

    Keith Jacobs;Jim Kemeny;Tony Manzi

  • Discourses of Social Exclusion: An Analysis of Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal

    Paul Watt;Keith Jacobs

  • A Critique of the Concept of Social Exclusion and Its Utility for Australian Social Housing Policy

    Kathryn Arthurson;Keith Jacobs

  • New Localism, Old Retrenchment: the 'Big Society', housing policy and the politics of welfare reform

    Keith Jacobs;Tony Manzi

  • What future for public housing? A critical analysis

    Keith Jacobs;Rowland Atkinson;Angela Spinney;Val Colic-Peisker

  • Key Themes and Future Prospects: Conclusion to the Special Issue:

    Keith Jacobs

  • Performance indicators and social constructivism: conflict and control in housing management

    Keith Jacobs;Tony Manzi

  • Waterfront Redevelopment: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Policy-making Process within the Chatham Maritime Project:

    Keith Jacobs

  • Public Housing in Australia: Stigma, Home and Opportunity

    Rowland Atkinson;Keith Jacobs

  • Material Objects, Identity and the Home: Towards a Relational Housing Research Agenda

    Keith Jacobs;Jeff Malpas

  • Social exclusion and housing. Final Report

    Kathy Arthurson;Keith Jacobs

  • The Post-Social Turn: Challenges for Housing Research

    Michelle Gabriel;Keith Jacobs

  • The inclusive society: Social exclusion and new Labour

    KA Jacobs

  • Subprime Cities: The Political Economy of Mortgage Markets

    Keith Jacobs

  • Gentrification and the middle classes

    KA Jacobs

Frequent Co-Authors

Rowland Atkinson
Rowland Atkinson University of Sheffield
Kath Hulse
Kath Hulse Swinburne University of Technology
Hal Pawson
Hal Pawson University of New South Wales
Nicole Gurran
Nicole Gurran University of Sydney
Cameron Duff
Cameron Duff RMIT University
Judith Yates
Judith Yates University of Sydney
Greg Marston
Greg Marston University of Queensland
Andrew Gamble
Andrew Gamble University of Sheffield
Rebecca Bentley
Rebecca Bentley University of Melbourne
Carol T. Kulik
Carol T. Kulik University of South Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science opens doors to many educational and career opportunities beyond government roles. Online learning has made it easier than ever to earn your degree, with many cheap online college classes now available. Flexible scheduling and affordability can help you balance your studies with work or other commitments.

If you’re considering broadening your horizons, related degrees like environmental science or mathematics can enhance your skillset. For example, look at the wide variety of options outlined in what can you do with an environmental science major. Understanding environmental policy, sustainability, or data analysis can add value to a political science background.

A strong foundation in analysis is also valued in political science, making programs like the online degree mathematics particularly useful for those interested in research or policy modeling. Furthermore, library and research careers remain vital. Exploring an online library science degree can prepare you for roles in academic, legal, or government research settings.

Best Scientists Citing Keith Jacobs

Trending Scientists