World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 46 3523 3243 1696 1535 129 12728

Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2000. 10 of the 140 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2000. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 4 publications
1986 2025

140 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 2
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 3
1992 6
1993 3
1994 2
1995 4
1996 4
1997 3
1998 4
1999 2
2000 9
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 1
2005 6
2006 5
2007 1
2008 2
2009 4
2010 2
2011 2
2012 7
2013 3
2014 3
2015 4
2016 2
2017 7
2018 5
2019 6
2020 5
2021 3
2022 5
2023 3
2024 6
2025 4
Total 140
Download as CSV

Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 129 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 129
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228 46
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas primarily within the arts and humanities and psychology, with specific focus on language and linguistics, literature and literary theory, and developmental and educational psychology. Their work addresses fields related to language learning and teaching, with an emphasis on second language acquisition and discourse analysis.

They have contributed to main topics including:

  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics
  • Research Methods in Applied Linguistics
  • The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching
  • Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • Language Teaching

Examples of recent papers by Bardovi-Harlig are:

  • THE ASPECT HYPOTHESIS AND THE ACQUISITION OF L2 PAST MORPHOLOGY IN THE LAST 20 YEARS, 2020, Studies in Second Language Acquisition
  • The relation of second language acquisition, instructed second language acquisition, and language teaching from the lens of second language tense-aspect, 2022, Language Teaching
  • Pedagogical linguistics, 2020, Pedagogical Linguistics
  • Developing an empirically-driven aural multiple-choice DCT for conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics, 2022, Applied Pragmatics
  • Recognition of conventional expressions by EFL learners in Mexico and China, 2022, System

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bardovi-Harlig include:

  • Llorenç Comajoan-Colomé
  • Yunwen Su
  • Jesús Izquierdo
  • Yücel Yılmaz
  • Sabrina Mossman

Best Publications

  • Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form, Meaning, and Use

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

  • Exploring the Interlanguage of Interlanguage Pragmatics: A Research Agenda for Acquisitional Pragmatics

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

  • Do Language Learners Recognize Pragmatic Violations? Pragmatic Versus Grammatical Awareness in Instructed L2 Learning.

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig;Zoltán Dörnyei

  • Learning the Rules of Academic Talk: A Longitudinal Study of Pragmatic Change.

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig;Beverly S. Hartford

  • Pragmatics in Language Teaching: Evaluating the empirical evidence: Grounds for instruction in pragmatics?

    Unknown

  • Pragmatics and Language Teaching: Bringing Pragmatics and Pedagogy Together.

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

  • Congruence in Native and Nonnative Conversations: Status Balance in the Academic Advising Session *

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig;Beverly S. Hartford

  • The Role of Lexical Aspect in the Acquisition of Tense and Aspect

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig;Dudley W. Reynolds

  • Developing L2 Pragmatics

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

  • Narrative Structure and Lexical Aspect: Conspiring Factors in Second Language Acquisition of Tense-Aspect Morphology.

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

  • Attainment of Syntactic and Morphological Accuracy by Advanced Language Learners.

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig;Theodora Bofman

  • The relationship of form and meaning: A cross-sectional study of tense and aspect in the interlanguage of learners of English as a second language

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

  • Markedness and Salience in Second‐Language Acquisition

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

  • A Second Look at T-Unit Analysis: Reconsidering the Sentence

    Kathleen Bardovi‐Harlig

  • L2 PRAGMATIC AWARENESS: EVIDENCE FROM THE ESL CLASSROOM

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig;Robert Griffin

  • A Narrative Perspective on the Development of the Tense/Aspect System in Second Language Acquisition.

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

  • Conventional Expressions as a Pragmalinguistic Resource: Recognition and Production of Conventional Expressions in L2 Pragmatics

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

  • Experimental and Observational Data in the Study of Interlanguage Pragmatics.

    Beverly S. Hartford;Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

  • Input in an Institutional Setting.

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig;Beverly S. Hartford

  • From Morpheme Studies to Temporal Semantics: Tense-Aspect Research in SLA.

    Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

  • The acquisition of tense-aspect: Converging evidence from corpora and telicity ratings

    Stefanie Wulff;Nick C. Ellis;Ute Romer;Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

Frequent Co-Authors

Zoltán Dörnyei
Zoltán Dörnyei University of Nottingham
Gabriele Kasper
Gabriele Kasper University of Hawaii at Manoa
Jasone Cenoz
Jasone Cenoz University of the Basque Country
Susan M. Gass
Susan M. Gass Michigan State University
Nick C. Ellis
Nick C. Ellis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ute Römer
Ute Römer Georgia State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, and pursuing your degree online offers both flexibility and affordability. If you're looking to complete a graduate degree quickly, consider an online masters degree that can be finished in just one year—ideal for those eager to advance their careers without a lengthy time commitment.

For undergraduates, 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees allow you to earn your qualification faster than traditional programs, helping you enter the workforce or start graduate study sooner.

If your interest lies in social work or behavioral sciences, affordability and accreditation are key. There are most affordable msw programs online for students seeking cost-effective routes to a Master of Social Work, and bcba accredited programs online for those planning to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts.

Online education provides numerous pathways, balancing quality, speed, and budget. Choosing the right program helps shape your future in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Kathleen Bardovi-Harlig

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles