World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
11506
World Ranking
12637
National Ranking
224

Käthi Geering publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Käthi Geering sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 129 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Käthi Geering D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Käthi Geering sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Käthi Geering was affiliated with the University of Lausanne in Switzerland during their academic career. The available data does not list specific research papers, which limits detailed insight into their individual publications and specific research contributions.

There is no recorded information on frequent co-authors or collaborative research partners linked to Käthi Geering. Similarly, details regarding common publication venues are not provided, which makes it difficult to trace the typical outlets or journals where their work appeared.

No information is available on Käthi Geering's main fields or subfields of study. As such, it is not possible to specify the scientific disciplines or specialized areas in which they conducted research.

Similarly, there are no listed main research topics or thematic areas that Käthi Geering focused on over the course of their career. Their academic profile does not include book publications or awards, which limits the scope of documented achievements.

The scientist is noted as deceased. Due to these limited data points, a comprehensive profile relies mainly on their affiliation at the University of Lausanne, without further insight into research outputs or professional distinctions.

Best Publications

  • Transport and Pharmacological Properties of Nine Different Human Na,K-ATPase Isozymes

    Gilles Crambert;Udo Hasler;Ahmed T. Beggah;Chuliang Yu

  • FXYD proteins: new regulators of Na-K-ATPase.

    Käthi Geering

  • The functional role of beta subunits in oligomeric P-type ATPases.

    Käthi Geering

  • Functional roles of Na,K-ATPase subunits.

    Käthi Geering

  • Regulation of Ca2+ channel expression at the cell surface by the small G-protein kir/Gem.

    Pascal Béguin;Kazuaki Nagashima;Tohru Gonoi;Tadao Shibasaki

  • Phospholemman (FXYD1) associates with Na,K-ATPase and regulates its transport properties.

    Gilles Crambert;Maria Füzesi;Haim Garty;Steven Karlish

  • A role for the beta-subunit in the expression of functional Na+-K+-ATPase in Xenopus oocytes.

    K. Geering;I. Theulaz;F. Verrey;M. T. Hauptle

  • The functional role of the β‐subunit in the maturation and intracellular transport of Na,K‐ATPase

    Käthi Geering

  • The gamma subunit is a specific component of the Na,K-ATPase and modulates its transport function.

    Pascal Béguin;Xinyu Wang;Dimitri Firsov;Alessandro Puoti

  • Subunit assembly and functional maturation of Na,K-ATPase.

    K. Geering

  • Phosphorylation of the Na,K-ATPase alpha-subunit by protein kinase A and C in vitro and in intact cells. Identification of a novel motif for PKC-mediated phosphorylation.

    P. Beguin;A.T. Beggah;A.V. Chibalin;P. Burgener-Kairuz

  • Regulation of the sodium pump: how and why?

    B.C. Rossier;K. Geering;J.P. Kraehenbuhl

  • Regulation by aldosterone of Na+,K+-ATPase mRNAs, protein synthesis, and sodium transport in cultured kidney cells.

    F Verrey;E Schaerer;P Zoerkler;M P Paccolat

  • Hormonal regulation of (Na+,K+)-ATPase biosynthesis in the toad bladder. Effect of aldosterone and 3,5,3'-triiodo-L-thyronine.

    K Geering;M Girardet;C Bron;J P Kraehenbühl

  • CHIF, a member of the FXYD protein family, is a regulator of Na,K-ATPase distinct from the γ-subunit

    Pascal Béguin;Gilles Crambert;Saida Guennoun;Haim Garty

  • ROLE OF BETA -SUBUNIT DOMAINS IN THE ASSEMBLY, STABLE EXPRESSION, INTRACELLULAR ROUTING, AND FUNCTIONAL PROPERTIES OF NA, K-ATPASE

    Udo Hasler;Xinyu Wang;Gilles Crambert;Pascal Béguin

  • Modulation of the Na,K-pump function by beta subunit isoforms.

    F Jaisser;P Jaunin;K Geering;B C Rossier

  • Oligomerization and maturation of Na,K-ATPase: functional interaction of the cytoplasmic NH2 terminus of the beta subunit with the alpha subunit.

    K Geering;A Beggah;P Good;S Girardet

  • FXYD7 is a brain‐specific regulator of Na,K‐ATPase α1–β isozymes

    Pascal Béguin;Gilles Crambert;Florianne Monnet‐Tschudi;Marc Uldry

  • FXYD proteins: new tissue-specific regulators of the ubiquitous Na,K-ATPase.

    Gilles Crambert;Käthi Geering

Frequent Co-Authors

Bernard C. Rossier
Bernard C. Rossier University of Lausanne
Jean-Daniel Horisberger
Jean-Daniel Horisberger University of Lausanne
Jean-Pierre Kraehenbuhl
Jean-Pierre Kraehenbuhl University of Lausanne
Sophie Roy
Sophie Roy MSD (United States)
François Verrey
François Verrey University of Zurich
Olivier Staub
Olivier Staub University of Lausanne
Steven J. D. Karlish
Steven J. D. Karlish Weizmann Institute of Science
Susanna Cotecchia
Susanna Cotecchia University of Lausanne
Jean-Luc Puel
Jean-Luc Puel University of Montpellier
Nathaniel Heintz
Nathaniel Heintz Rockefeller University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

There are many flexible online degree options for students interested in expanding their knowledge in biology, biochemistry, and related fields. For those who want to specialize in nutrition, pursuing an online masters degree in nutrition can lead to rewarding roles in hospitals, wellness centers, and research organizations.

If you are interested in technology and healthcare, accredited online sonography programs can prepare you for careers in diagnostic medical imaging. Similarly, online associate radiology tech programs offer an affordable route to enter the growing field of radiological sciences.

For students keen on nutrition therapy, a master's from one of the top dietetics masters programs is an excellent choice. These online pathways offer flexibility, affordability, and strong job prospects, making them ideal for busy professionals and career changers alike.

Best Scientists Citing Käthi Geering