World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
12732
World Ranking
5836
National Ranking
3167

Karen S. Quigley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen S. Quigley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 150 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Karen S. Quigley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen S. Quigley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karen S. Quigley is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience, psychology, and medicine, with notable contributions in subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, and social psychology.

Their work addresses a range of main topics, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Action Observation and Synchronization

Several recent papers authored or coauthored by Quigley illustrate their research focus. These include:

  • "Functions of Interoception: From Energy Regulation to Experience of the Self" (2020) published in Trends in Neurosciences
  • "Improving the study of brain-behavior relationships by revisiting basic assumptions" (2023) published in Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Context-aware experience sampling reveals the scale of variation in affective experience" (2020) published in Scientific Reports
  • "Interoception as modeling, allostasis as control" (2021) published in Biological Psychology
  • "Publication guidelines for human heart rate and heart rate variability studies in psychophysiology-Part 1: Physiological underpinnings and foundations of measurement" (2024) published in Psychophysiology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Quigley include Lisa Feldman Barrett, Jordan E. Theriault, Ajay B. Satpute, Katie Hoemann, and Jolie B. Wormwood.

Quigley has published multiple works in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, Psychophysiology, PLoS ONE, and Biological Psychology.

In addition to articles, Quigley has contributed to books published by Bloomsbury Publishing plc, including "Performing the Unstageable" (2020) and "Drag Histories, Herstories and Hairstories" (2020).

Best Publications

  • Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: Autonomic origins, physiological mechanisms, and psychophysiological implications.

    Gary G. Berntson;John T. Cacioppo;Karen S. Quigley

  • Autonomic determinism: the modes of autonomic control, the doctrine of autonomic space, and the laws of autonomic constraint.

    Gary G. Berntson;John T. Cacioppo;Karen S. Quigley

  • Evidence for a Large-Scale Brain System Supporting Allostasis and Interoception in Humans.

    Ian R. Kleckner;Jiahe Zhang;Alexandra Touroutoglou;Lorena Chanes;Lorena Chanes

  • An active inference theory of allostasis and interoception in depression

    Lisa Feldman Barrett;Karen S. Quigley;Paul Hamilton

  • Autonomic cardiac control. III. Psychological stress and cardiac response in autonomic space as revealed by pharmacological blockades.

    Gary G. Berntson;John T. Cacioppo;Philip F. Binkley;Bert N. Uchino

  • Cardiac psychophysiology and autonomic space in humans: empirical perspectives and conceptual implications.

    Gary G. Berntson;John T. Cacioppo;Karen S. Quigley

  • Interoceptive Sensitivity and Self-Reports of Emotional Experience

    Lisa Feldman Barrett;Karen S. Quigley;Eliza Bliss-Moreau;Keith R. Aronson

  • Autonomic cardiac control. II: Noninvasive indices and basal response as revealed by autonomic blockades

    John T. Cacioppo;Gary G. Berntson;Philip F. Binkley;Karen S. Quigley

  • An approach to artifact identification: application to heart period data.

    Gary G. Berntson;Karen S. Quigley;Jaye F. Jang;Sarah T. Boysen

  • Emotion fingerprints or emotion populations? A meta-analytic investigation of autonomic features of emotion categories.

    Erika H. Siegel;Molly K. Sands;Wim Van den Noortgate;Paul Condon

  • Autonomic space and psychophysiological response

    Gary G. Berntson;John T. Cacioppo;Karen S. Quigley;Vincent T. Fabro

  • The hundred-year emotion war: are emotions natural kinds or psychological constructions? Comment on Lench, Flores, and Bench (2011).

    Kristen A. Lindquist;Erika H. Siegel;Karen S. Quigley;Lisa Feldman Barrett

  • Functions of Interoception: From Energy Regulation to Experience of the Self

    Karen S. Quigley;Scott Kanoski;Warren M. Grill;Lisa Feldman Barrett

  • Beginning with biology: "Aspects of cognition" exist in the service of the brain's overall function as a resource-regulator.

    Jordan E. Theriault;Matt Coleman;Mallory J. Feldman;Joseph D. Fridman

  • The metrics of cardiac chronotropism: Biometric perspectives

    Gary G. Berntson;John T. Cacioppo;Karen S. Quigley

  • Processing of ordinality and transitivity by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

    Sarah T. Boysen;Gary G. Berntson;Traci A. Shreyer;Karen S. Quigley

  • Measures of postural stability.

    Hans Chaudhry;Thomas Findley;Karen S. Quigley;Bruce Bukiet

  • Methodological recommendations for a heartbeat detection‐based measure of interoceptive sensitivity

    Ian R. Kleckner;Jolie Baumann Wormwood;W. Kyle Simmons;W. Kyle Simmons;Lisa Feldman Barrett;Lisa Feldman Barrett

  • Chronic Widespread Pain, Mental Health, and Physical Role Function in OEF/OIF Veterans

    Drew A. Helmer;Helena K. Chandler;Karen S. Quigley;Melissa Blatt

  • A shift in perspective: Decentering through mindful attention to imagined stressful events.

    Lauren A. M. Lebois;Lauren A. M. Lebois;Esther K. Papies;Kaundinya Gopinath;Romeo Cabanban

  • Feeling your body or feeling badly: evidence for the limited validity of the Somatosensory Amplification Scale as an index of somatic sensitivity.

    Keith R Aronson;Lisa Feldman Barrett;Karen S Quigley

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisa Feldman Barrett
Lisa Feldman Barrett Northeastern University
Gary G. Berntson
Gary G. Berntson The Ohio State University
John T. Cacioppo
John T. Cacioppo University of Chicago
Jennifer G. Dy
Jennifer G. Dy Northeastern University
Matthew S. Goodwin
Matthew S. Goodwin Northeastern University
W. Kyle Simmons
W. Kyle Simmons Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences
Wilfred R. Pigeon
Wilfred R. Pigeon University of Rochester Medical Center
Bradford C. Dickerson
Bradford C. Dickerson Harvard Medical School
Maggie Shiffrar
Maggie Shiffrar Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA offers a wide range of online degrees and career trajectories. Many students pursue related programs in school counseling, which combine psychology principles with educational support. State requirements can differ significantly, so it’s essential to understand the specific pathways in your area.

For example, if you are interested in working with students, it’s important to research Ohio school counselor education requirements and compare them to Oklahoma school counselor education requirements to identify key differences in coursework, field experience, and certification exams.

Similarly, understanding how to become a school counselor in Oregon or knowing the requirements to be a school counselor in Pennsylvania will help you prepare for licensure or credentialing in those states.

With the growth of flexible, accredited online degrees, pursuing these options is more accessible than ever. Whether you aim to become a counselor, educator, or psychologist, understanding state-specific requirements is a critical first step.

Best Scientists Citing Karen S. Quigley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles