World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
53
Citations
18955
World Ranking
805
National Ranking
119

Jun-Hwa Cheah publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jun-Hwa Cheah sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 151 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Jun-Hwa Cheah D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jun-Hwa Cheah sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict

    Galit Shmueli;Marko Sarstedt;Joseph F. Hair;Jun-Hwa Cheah

  • How to Specify, Estimate, and Validate Higher-Order Constructs in PLS-SEM:

    Marko Sarstedt;Joseph F. Hair;Jun-Hwa Cheah;Jan-Michael Becker

  • Sample Size for Survey Research: Review and Recommendations

    Mumtaz Ali Memon;Hiram Ting;Jun-Hwa Cheah;Ramayah Thurasamy

  • Structural model robustness checks in PLS-SEM:

    Marko Sarstedt;Christian M Ringle;Jun-Hwa Cheah;Hiram Ting

  • PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance

    Unknown

  • Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: a software review

    Marko Sarstedt;Marko Sarstedt;Jun-Hwa Cheah

  • The Impact of Social Media Influencers on Purchase Intention and the Mediation Effect of Customer Attitude

    Xin Jean Lim;Aifa Rozaini bt Mohd Radzol

  • Demystifying the role of causal-predictive modeling using partial least squares structural equation modeling in information systems research

    Wynne Chin;Jun-Hwa Cheah;Yide Liu;Hiram Ting

  • Convergent validity assessment of formatively measured constructs in PLS-SEM: On using single-item versus multi-item measures in redundancy analyses

    Jun Hwa Cheah;Marko Sarstedt;Christian M. Ringle;T. Ramayah

  • MODERATION ANALYSIS: ISSUES AND GUIDELINES

    Mumtaz Ali Memon;Jun-Hwa Cheah;T. Ramayah;Hiram Ting

  • PLS-SEM STATISTICAL PROGRAMS: A REVIEW

    Mumtaz Ali Memon;T Ramayah;Jun-Hwa Cheah;Hiram Ting

  • Mediation analysis issues and recommendations

    Mumtaz Ali Memon;Hwa Cheah Jun;Ramayah T;Hiram Ting

  • Does firm size matter? Evidence on the impact of the green innovation strategy on corporate financial performance in the automotive sector

    Woon Leong Lin;Jun-Hwa Cheah;Mohamed Azali;Jo Ann Ho

  • Multigroup analysis of more than two groups in PLS-SEM: A review, illustration, and recommendations

    Unknown

  • Multigroup analysis using SmartPLS: step-by-step guidelines for business research

    Jun-Hwa Cheah;Ramayah Thurasamy

  • A review of the methodological misconceptions and guidelines related to the application of structural equation modeling: A Malaysian scenario

    Mumtaz Ali Memon;Hiram Ting;T Ramayah;Francis Chuah

  • Are privacy concerns still relevant? Revisiting consumer behaviour in omnichannel retailing

    Jun-Hwa Cheah;Xin-Jean Lim;Hiram Ting;Yide Liu

  • Medical Tourism Destination Image and its Relationship with the Intention to Revisit: A Study of Chinese Medical Tourists in Malaysia

    Tat-Huei Cham;Yet-Mee Lim;Bee-Chuan Sia;Jun-Hwa Cheah

  • Satisfaction matters: the relationships between HRM practices, work engagement and turnover intention

    Mumtaz Ali Memon;Rohani Salleh;Muhammad Zeeshan Mirza;Jun-Hwa Cheah

  • A comparison of five reflective–formative estimation approaches: reconsideration and recommendations for tourism research

    Jun-Hwa Cheah;Hiram Ting;T. Ramayah;Mumtaz Ali Memon

Frequent Co-Authors

Hiram Ting
Hiram Ting Asia Pacific University of Technology & Innovation
Marko Sarstedt
Marko Sarstedt Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
Thurasamy Ramayah
Thurasamy Ramayah Universiti Sains Malaysia
Christian M. Ringle
Christian M. Ringle Hamburg University of Technology
Joseph F. Hair
Joseph F. Hair University of South Alabama
Galit Shmueli
Galit Shmueli National Tsing Hua University
Park Thaichon
Park Thaichon University of Southern Queensland
José L. Roldán
José L. Roldán University of Seville
Murali Sambasivan
Murali Sambasivan Thiagarajar School of Management
Wynne W. Chin
Wynne W. Chin University of Houston

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jun-Hwa Cheah

Recently Published Articles