World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
15376
World Ranking
7010
National Ranking
3073

Joseph H. Matthews publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph H. Matthews sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 53 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Joseph H. Matthews D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph H. Matthews sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Operating system
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Software

Channel, Multimedia, Interactive television, User interface and Control are his primary areas of study. His Channel research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Relation and Resource. The various areas that Joseph H. Matthews examines in his Resource study include Interactive content and Presentation.

Joseph H. Matthews studied User interface and Mode that intersect with Multiple user interface. The concepts of his Control study are interwoven with issues in Computer hardware and Computer graphics. His Computer graphics research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Computer vision and Artificial intelligence.

His most cited work include:

  • Interactive entertainment system for presenting supplemental interactive content together with continuous video programs (1299 citations)
  • Electronic program guide with hyperlinks to target resources (862 citations)
  • System for displaying programming information (674 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary areas of investigation include Multimedia, Computer hardware, User interface, Display device and Interactive television. His Multimedia research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Metadata, Selection, Channel and Presentation. His study in Channel is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Relation and Resource.

His Computer hardware research incorporates elements of Mode, Control, Interface and Embedded system. His research integrates issues of Hyperlink and Shell in his study of User interface. While the research belongs to areas of Interactive television, he spends his time largely on the problem of Computer graphics, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Artificial intelligence, Computer vision and Schedule.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Multimedia (26.15%)
  • Computer hardware (24.62%)
  • User interface (21.54%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2017)?

  • Mobile device (10.77%)
  • Computer network (7.69%)
  • Multimedia (26.15%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Mobile device, Computer network, Multimedia, Service and Communication interface. His Mobile device course of study focuses on Display device and User interface and Computer hardware. His work deals with themes such as Mode and Lock screen, which intersect with Computer hardware.

He has included themes like Presentation, Metadata and Identification in his Multimedia study. His Metadata research includes themes of New media and Event. His Service research focuses on Control and how it relates to Simulation and Electrical engineering.

Between 2011 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Mobile Device Safe Driving (141 citations)
  • Video highlight identification based on environmental sensing (123 citations)
  • Mobile devices control (118 citations)

Best Publications

  • Interactive entertainment system for presenting supplemental interactive content together with continuous video programs

    Daniel J. Shoff;Valerie L. Bronson;Joseph H. Matthews;Frank A. Lawler

  • Electronic program guide with hyperlinks to target resources

    Joseph H. Matthews;Frank Lawler;James O. Robarts;David S. Byrne

  • System for displaying programming information

    Keith Rowe;Frank Lawler;Joseph H. Matthews

  • Program time guide

    Frank A. Lawler;Joseph H. Matthews

  • System and method for calling video on demand using an electronic programming guide

    Michel Girard;Keith Rowe;Joseph H. Matthews;Frank Lawler

  • System and method for automatically recording programs in an interactive viewing system

    Frank A. Lawler;Joseph H. Matthews

  • System for automatic pause/resume of content delivered on a channel in response to switching to and from that channel and resuming so that a portion of the content is repeated

    Matthew W. Dunn;Seung-Yup Chai;Joseph H. Matthews

  • Program reminder system

    Frank A. Lawler;Joseph H. Matthews

  • Video control user interface for controlling display of a video

    Matthew W. Dunn;Joseph H. Matthews;Edwin Thorne

  • Interactive program summary panel

    Frank A. Lawler;Joseph H. Matthews

  • System for displaying a list on a display screen

    Joseph H. Matthews;JoGene Kapell;Keith Lindsey Rowe

  • Interactive television system and method for viewer control of multiple camera viewpoints in broadcast programming

    Joseph H. Matthews

  • System and method for linking video, services and applications in an interactive television system

    Daniel J. Shoff;Joseph H. Matthews

  • Virtual channels in subscriber interface units

    Joseph H. Matthews;Richard A. Gillmann;Keith L. Rowe

  • System and method for displaying a program guide for an interactive televideo system

    Joseph H. Matthews

  • Interactive program identification system

    Joseph H. Matthews

  • User friendly remote system interface

    Joseph H. Matthews;David Wm. Plummer;David A. Barnes

  • Message delivery method for interactive televideo system

    Joseph H. Matthews

  • Systems and method for displaying control objects including a plurality of panels

    Joseph H. Matthews;Steven Alfred Isaac;William Hong Vong

  • Methods and systems for a portable, interactive display device for use with a computer

    Joseph H. Matthews;Richard W. Stoakley

Frequent Co-Authors

Raman K. Sarin
Raman K. Sarin Microsoft (United States)
Doug Burger
Doug Burger Microsoft (United States)
Sharad Agarwal
Sharad Agarwal Microsoft (United States)
Steven Bathiche
Steven Bathiche Microsoft (United States)
Ken Hinckley
Ken Hinckley Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can open up many career opportunities in computer science and related tech fields. Today, many institutions offer flexible programs, from certificates to graduate degrees, making it easier for students with diverse backgrounds to pursue their goals.

For those looking to upskill or change career paths, it’s wise to consider the most in demand masters degrees. These programs often lead to high-growth roles in areas like AI, data science, and cybersecurity.

If you want to start your journey sooner or at a lower cost, an associate degree online is another accessible pathway. Many students use these degrees as a stepping stone towards further study or entry-level tech roles.

Budget-conscious learners should explore the cheapest online college options to minimize debt while obtaining a quality education. Additionally, those concerned about their academic record can find online colleges that accept low gpa, ensuring more students have access to credible degree programs.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph H. Matthews

Recently Published Articles