World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
65
Citations
23697
World Ranking
1742
National Ranking
636

Jonathan A. Coddington publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan A. Coddington sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 152 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jonathan A. Coddington D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan A. Coddington sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Jonathan A. Coddington is affiliated with the National Museum of Natural History in the United States. Their research spans multiple scientific domains, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a considerable portion of their work also related to environmental science.

Their specific subfields of study include molecular biology, ecology, genetics, paleontology, and ecological modeling. The research topics they have contributed to cover a range of areas such as genomics and phylogenetic studies, environmental DNA in biodiversity studies, identification and quantification in food, species distribution and climate change, spider taxonomy and behavior studies, subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy, and chromosomal and genetic variations.

Jonathan A. Coddington has contributed to the following recent papers:

  • The Earth BioGenome Project 2020: Starting the clock, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Why sequence all eukaryotes?, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Standards recommendations for the Earth BioGenome Project, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Multilateral benefit-sharing from digital sequence information will support both science and biodiversity conservation, 2022, Nature Communications
  • Stabilized Morphological Evolution of Spiders Despite Mosaic Changes in Foraging Ecology, 2022, Systematic Biology

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Anna K. Childers
  • Mara Lawniczak
  • Mark Blaxter
  • Bernardo F. Santos
  • Harris A. Lewin

They have published extensively in the following venues:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Systematic Biology
  • Biodiversity Data Journal
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications

Jonathan A. Coddington has been recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) since 2003.

Best Publications

  • Estimating Terrestrial Biodiversity through Extrapolation

    Robert K. Colwell;Jonathan A. Coddington

  • Systematics and Evolution of Spiders (Araneae)

    Jonathan A. Coddington;Herbert W. Levi

  • Earth BioGenome Project: Sequencing life for the future of life.

    Harris A. Lewin;Gene E. Robinson;W. John Kress;William J. Baker

  • THE ANT FAUNA OF A TROPICAL RAIN FOREST: ESTIMATING SPECIES RICHNESS THREE DIFFERENT WAYS

    John T. Longino;Jonathan Coddington;Robert K. Colwell

  • CLADISTIC TESTS OF ADAPTATIONAL HYPOTHESES

    Jonathan A. Coddington

  • Global Patterns of Guild Composition and Functional Diversity of Spiders

    Pedro Cardoso;Stanislav Pekár;Rudy Jocqué;Jonathan A. Coddington

  • The spider tree of life: phylogeny of Araneae based on target‐gene analyses from an extensive taxon sampling

    Ward C. Wheeler;Jonathan A. Coddington;Louise M. Crowley;Dimitar Dimitrov;Dimitar Dimitrov

  • The i5K initiative: Advancing arthropod genomics for knowledge, human health, agriculture, and the environment

    Jay D Evans;Susan J Brown;Kevin J Hackett;Gene Robinson

  • The house spider genome reveals an ancient whole-genome duplication during arachnid evolution

    Evelyn E. Schwager;Evelyn E. Schwager;Prashant P. Sharma;Thomas Clarke;Thomas Clarke;Thomas Clarke;Daniel J. Leite

  • Reconstructing web evolution and spider diversification in the molecular era.

    Todd A. Blackledge;Nikolaj Scharff;Jonathan A. Coddington;Tamas Szüts

  • Undersampling bias: the null hypothesis for singleton species in tropical arthropod surveys

    Jonathan A. Coddington;Ingi Agnarsson;Ingi Agnarsson;Jeremy A. Miller;Matjaž Kuntner;Matjaž Kuntner

  • Phylogeny of the orb-web building spiders (Araneae, Orbiculariae: Deinopoidea, Araneoidea)

    Charles E. Griswold;Jonathan A. Coddington;Gustavo Hormiga;Nikolaj Scharff

  • Estimating Spider Species Richness in a Southern Appalachian Cove Hardwood Forest

    Jonathan A. Coddington;Laurel H. Young;Frederick A. Coyle

  • Designing and Testing Sampling Protocols to Estimate Biodiversity in Tropical Ecosystems

    Jonathan A. Coddington;C. E. Griswold;D. Silva;E. Peñaranda

  • A phylogenetic analysis of the orb-weaving spider family Araneidae (Arachnida, Araneae)

    Nikolaj Scharff;Jonathan A. Coddington

  • ON MISSING ENTRIES IN CLADISTIC ANALYSIS

    Norman I. Platnick;Charles E. Griswold;Jonathan A. Coddington

  • Spider phylogenomics: untangling the Spider Tree of Life

    Nicole L. Garrison;Juanita Rodriguez;Ingi Agnarsson;Jonathan A. Coddington

  • Ontogeny and Homology in the Male Palpus of Orb Weaving Spiders and their Relatives, with Comments on Phylogeny (Araneoclada: Araneoidea, Deinopoidea)

    Jonathan A. Coddington

  • PROBLEMS WITH ZERO‐LENGTH BRANCHES

    Jonathan A. Coddington;Nikolaj Scharff

  • Atlas of phylogenetic data for entelegyne spiders (Araneae: Araneomorphae: Entelegynae) with comments on their phylogeny

    Charles E. Griswold;Martin J. Ramirez;Jonathan A. Coddington;Norman I. Platnick

  • Spinneret Morphology and the Phylogeny of Haplogyne Spiders (Araneae, Araneomorphae)

    N. I. Platnick;Jonathan A. Coddington;R. R. Forster;C. E. Griswold

  • From a comb to a tree: phylogenetic relationships of the comb-footed spiders (Araneae, Theridiidae) inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial genes

    Miquel A Arnedo;Jonathan Coddington;Ingi Agnarsson;Ingi Agnarsson;Rosemary G Gillespie

Frequent Co-Authors

Ingi Agnarsson
Ingi Agnarsson University of Iceland
Matjaž Kuntner
Matjaž Kuntner National Institute of Biology
Charles E. Griswold
Charles E. Griswold California Academy of Sciences
Gustavo Hormiga
Gustavo Hormiga George Washington University
Norman I. Platnick
Norman I. Platnick American Museum of Natural History
Cheryl Y. Hayashi
Cheryl Y. Hayashi American Museum of Natural History
Dimitar Dimitrov
Dimitar Dimitrov University of Bergen
Stephen Richards
Stephen Richards South Australian Museum
Jack A. Gilbert
Jack A. Gilbert University of California, San Diego
Neil M Davies
Neil M Davies University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the field of Ecology and Evolution rapidly evolves, students are finding diverse online degree options to meet their career goals. From flexible undergraduate programs to advanced graduate studies, online learning platforms offer accessible and reputable ways to prepare for environmental careers.

When weighing your choices, it’s crucial to compare institutions and program formats. For example, understanding differences similar to those outlined in wgu vs chamberlain can help you select the right school for your needs. Those considering further studies can also explore bridge programs, much like the bsn to msn programs online, to seamlessly transition between degree levels.

Be sure to look for programs from non profit online schools, which often balance affordability with accreditation. If you are a service member or veteran, finding military friendly online colleges can provide valuable support and flexibility.

Taking these factors into account will help you choose an online degree that aligns with your passion for Ecology and Evolution — and puts you on a rewarding career path.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan A. Coddington

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles