World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Johnny R. J. Fontaine

Johnny R. J. Fontaine

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
8243
World Ranking
8759
National Ranking
126

Johnny R. J. Fontaine publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johnny R. J. Fontaine sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Johnny R. J. Fontaine D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johnny R. J. Fontaine sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The world of emotions is not two-dimensional.

    Johnny R.J. Fontaine;Klaus R. Scherer;Etienne B. Roesch;Phoebe C. Ellsworth

  • Mapping Expressive Differences Around the World The Relationship Between Emotional Display Rules and Individualism Versus Collectivism

    Dawn A. Matsumoto;Seung Hee Yoo;Johnny Fontaine

  • Toward an integrative and fine-grained insight in motivating and demotivating teaching styles: The merits of a circumplex approach

    Nathalie Aelterman;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Leen Haerens;Bart Soenens

  • Structural Equivalence of the Values Domain Across Cultures Distinguishing Sampling Fluctuations From Meaningful Variation

    Johnny R. J. Fontaine;Ype H. Poortinga;Luc Delbeke;Shalom H. Schwartz

  • Are Individual-Level and Country-Level Value Structures Different? Testing Hofstede’s Legacy With the Schwartz Value Survey

    Ronald Fischer;Johnny R. J. Fontaine;Shalom H. Schwartz

  • The GRID meets the wheel: assessing emotional feeling via self-report

    Klaus R. Scherer;Vera Shuman;Johnny J. R. Fontaine;Cristina Soriano

  • Does the Test of Self-Conscious Affect (TOSCA) measure maladaptive aspects of guilt and adaptive aspects of shame? An empirical investigation

    Patrick Luyten;Johnny R.J Fontaine;Jozef Corveleyn

  • Mental health during COVID-19 lockdown in the United Kingdom.

    Christoph Pieh;Sanja Budimir;Jaime Delgadillo;Michael Barkham

  • The factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory-II: an evaluation.

    Stijn Vanheule;Mattias Desmet;Hans Groenvynck;Yves Rosseel

  • A further elaboration of the post-critical belief scale: Evidence for the existence of four different approaches to religion in Flanders-Belgium

    Bart Duriez;Johnny R.J. Fontaine;Dirk Hutsebaut

  • The internal structure of the Post-Critical Belief scale

    Johnny R.J Fontaine;Bart Duriez;Patrick Luyten;Dirk Hutsebaut

  • Cognitive structure of emotion terms in Indonesia and The Netherlands

    Johnny R.J. Fontaine;Ype H. Poortinga;Bernadette Setiadi;Suprapti S. Markam

  • Adopting a helicopter-perspective towards motivating and demotivating coaching: A circumplex approach

    Jochen Delrue;Bart Reynders;Gert Vande Broek;Nathalie Aelterman

  • The test of self-conscious affect: internal structure, differential scales and relationships with long-term affects

    Johnny R. J. Fontaine;Patrick Luyten;Paul De Boeck;Jozef Corveleyn

  • Confirming the distinctiveness of complicated grief from depression and anxiety among adolescents.

    Let Dillen;Johnny R. J. Fontaine;Leni Verhofstadt-Denève

  • Untying the Gordian Knot of Guilt and Shame The Structure of Guilt and Shame Reactions Based on Situation and Person Variation in Belgium, Hungary, and Peru

    Johnny R. J. Fontaine;Patrick Luyten;Paul de Boeck;Jozef Corveleyn

  • Methods for investigating structural equivalence.

    Ronald Fischer;Johnny R. J. Fontaine

  • In Search of a Comprehensive Value Model for Assessing Supplementary Person—Organization Fit

    Stefaan De Clercq;Johnny R J Fontaine;Frederik Anseel

  • The prediction of stress by values and value conflict.

    Dave Bouckenooghe;Marc Buelens;Johnny Fontaine;Karlien Vanderheyden

  • The unbearable lightness of somatisation: A systematic review of the concept of somatisation in empirical studies of pain

    Geert Crombez;Koen Beirens;Stefaan Van Damme;Christopher Eccleston

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Luyten
Patrick Luyten University College London
Paul De Boeck
Paul De Boeck The Ohio State University
Bart Duriez
Bart Duriez KU Leuven
Ronald Fischer
Ronald Fischer Victoria University of Wellington
Shalom H. Schwartz
Shalom H. Schwartz Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Klaus R. Scherer
Klaus R. Scherer University of Geneva
Stefaan Van Damme
Stefaan Van Damme Ghent University
Geert Crombez
Geert Crombez Ghent University
Yves Rosseel
Yves Rosseel Ghent University
Phoebe C. Ellsworth
Phoebe C. Ellsworth University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Johnny R. J. Fontaine

Recently Published Articles