World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
94
Citations
26437
World Ranking
2048
National Ranking
1115

John Turk publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Turk sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 288 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

John Turk D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Turk sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Turk is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with particular emphasis on subfields including Surgery, Physiology, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, as well as Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's work spans multiple topics connected to pancreatic function and diabetes, metabolism, diabetes and cancer, as well as infectious disease research including studies on Leishmaniasis and Trypanosoma species. Additional focus areas include lysosomal storage disorders and erythrocyte function and pathophysiology.

Recent scholarly contributions by John Turk include the following papers:

  • Lysophospholipid acylation modulates plasma membrane lipid organization and insulin sensitivity in skeletal muscle, 2021, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Metabolic Effects of Selective Deletion of Group VIA Phospholipase A2 from Macrophages or Pancreatic Islet Beta-Cells, 2020, Biomolecules
  • Inositol phosphorylceramide synthase null Leishmania are viable and virulent in animal infections where salvage of host sphingomyelin predominates, 2022, Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Structural Determination of a New Peptidolipid Family from Rhodococcus opacus and the Pathogen Rhodococcus equi by Multiple Stage Mass Spectrometry, 2020, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
  • Noncanonical Regulation of cAMP-Dependent Insulin Secretion and Its Implications in Type 2 Diabetes, 2023, Comprehensive Physiology

John Turk has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Sasanka Ramanadham, Fong-Fu Hsu, Haowei Song, Cheryl Frankfater, and F Kuhlmann.

The venues in which John Turk has published repeatedly encompass:

  • Comprehensive Physiology
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Biomolecules
  • Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

Best Publications

  • Arachidonic Acid Metabolism

    P Needleman;J Turk;B A Jakschik;A R Morrison

  • New hepatic fat activates PPARalpha to maintain glucose, lipid, and cholesterol homeostasis

    Manu V. Chakravarthy;Zhijun Pan;Yimin Zhu;Karen Tordjman

  • Identification of a Physiologically Relevant Endogenous Ligand for PPARα in Liver

    Manu V. Chakravarthy;Irfan J. Lodhi;Li Yin;Raghu R.V. Malapaka

  • Electrospray Ionization with Low-energy Collisionally Activated Dissociation Tandem Mass Spectrometry of Glycerophospholipids: Mechanisms of Fragmentation and Structural Characterization

    Fong-Fu Hsu;J. Turk

  • Matrix metalloproteinase-9 degrades amyloid-β fibrils in vitro and compact plaques in situ

    Ping Yan;Xiaoyan Hu;Haowei Song;Kejie Yin

  • Matrix Metalloproteinases Expressed by Astrocytes Mediate Extracellular Amyloid-β Peptide Catabolism

    Ke Jie Yin;John R. Cirrito;Ping Yan;Xiaoyan Hu

  • The PmrA-Regulated pmrC Gene Mediates Phosphoethanolamine Modification of Lipid A and Polymyxin Resistance in Salmonella enterica

    Hyunwoo Lee;Fong Fu Hsu;John Turk;Eduardo A. Groisman

  • Characterization of phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate, and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry: a mechanistic study.

    Fong-Fu Hsu;John Turk

  • Intracellular Ca2+ mobilization by arachidonic acid. Comparison with myo-inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate in isolated pancreatic islets.

    B A Wolf;J Turk;W R Sherman;M L McDaniel

  • Structural characterization of triacylglycerols as lithiated adducts by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry using low-energy collisionally activated dissociation on a triple stage quadrupole instrument

    Fong-Fu Hsu;John Turk

  • Electrospray ionization/tandem quadrupole mass spectrometric studies on phosphatidylcholines : the fragmentation processes

    Fong-F.u Hsu;John Turk

  • IL-1 beta induces the coexpression of both nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenase by islets of Langerhans: activation of cyclooxygenase by nitric oxide.

    John A. Corbett;Guim Kwon;John Turk;Michael L. McDaniel

  • Biochemical Evidence for Nitric Oxide Formation from Streptozotocin in Isolated Pancreatic Islets

    John Turk;John A. Corbett;Sasanka Ramanadham;Alan Bohrer

  • Charge-remote and charge-driven fragmentation processes in diacyl glycerophosphoethanolamine upon low-energy collisional activation: a mechanistic proposal

    Fong-Fu Hsu;J. Turk

  • Mitochondrial Dysfunction and β-Cell Failure in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

    Zhongmin Alex Ma;Zhengshan Zhao;John Turk

  • Diacylglycerol accumulation and microvascular abnormalities induced by elevated glucose levels.

    B A Wolf;J R Williamson;R A Easom;K Chang

  • Inhibiting Adipose Tissue Lipogenesis Reprograms Thermogenesis and PPARγ Activation to Decrease Diet-Induced Obesity

    Irfan J. Lodhi;Li Yin;Anne P.L. Jensen-Urstad;Katsuhiko Funai

  • Formation of lithiated adducts of glycerophosphocholine lipids facilitates their identification by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry

    Fong-Fu Hsu;Alan Bohrer;John Turk

  • Identification of a pharmacologically distinct prostaglandin H synthase in cultured epithelial cells.

    M J Holtzman;J Turk;L P Shornick

  • Disrupted Membrane Homeostasis and Accumulation of Ubiquitinated Proteins in a Mouse Model of Infantile Neuroaxonal Dystrophy Caused by PLA2G6 Mutations

    Ibrahim Malik;John Turk;David J. Mancuso;Laura Montier

Frequent Co-Authors

Fong-Fu Hsu
Fong-Fu Hsu Washington University in St. Louis
Sasanka Ramanadham
Sasanka Ramanadham University of Alabama at Birmingham
Michael L. McDaniel
Michael L. McDaniel Washington University in St. Louis
Richard W. Gross
Richard W. Gross Washington University in St. Louis
Philip Needleman
Philip Needleman Washington University in St. Louis
Clay F. Semenkovich
Clay F. Semenkovich Washington University in St. Louis
Stephen M. Beverley
Stephen M. Beverley Washington University in St. Louis
Garland R. Marshall
Garland R. Marshall Washington University in St. Louis
John A. Corbett
John A. Corbett Medical College of Wisconsin
John A. Oates
John A. Oates Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John Turk

Trending Scientists