World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John T. Lanzetta

John T. Lanzetta

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
5629
World Ranking
9205
National Ranking
4880

John T. Lanzetta publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John T. Lanzetta sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 72 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John T. Lanzetta D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John T. Lanzetta sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John T. Lanzetta was affiliated with Dartmouth College in the United States during their academic career.

The scientist's work did not have publicly listed recent papers, frequent co-authors, or common publication venues that could be identified from available data.

No specific fields or subfields of study were documented for John T. Lanzetta, nor were there main topics of work or thematic areas linked to their publications.

Their academic contributions were not recorded with any book publications or associated publishers in the provided information.

There were no awards recorded or specified to have been received by John T. Lanzetta, and the date of passing is noted, indicating that the scientist is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Emotional reactions to a political leader's expressive displays.

    Gregory J. McHugo;John T. Lanzetta;Denis G. Sullivan;Roger D. Masters

  • Expectations of Cooperation and Competition and Their Effects on Observers' Vicarious Emotional Responses

    Unknown

  • Effects of being observed on expressive, subjective, and physiological responses to painful stimuli.

    Robert E. Kleck;Robert C. Vaughan;Jeffrey Cartwright-Smith;Katherine Burns Vaughan

  • Effects of nonverbal dissimulation on emotional experience and autonomic arousal.

    Unknown

  • Encoding and decoding of nonverbal affect in humans.

    John T. Lanzetta;Robert E. Kleck

  • The facilitative effect of facial expression on the self-generation of emotion.

    Ursula Hess;Arvid Kappas;Gregory J. McHugo;John T. Lanzetta

  • The effect of attitudes on emotional reactions to expressive displays of political leaders

    Gregory J. McHugo;John T. Lanzetta;Lauren K. Bush

  • The structure of self-reports of emotional responses to film segments

    Gregory J. McHugo;Craig A. Smith;John T. Lanzetta

  • The effects of facial control and facial mimicry on subjective reactions to comedy routines

    Lauren K. Bush;Carol L. Barr;Gregory J. McHugo;John T. Lanzetta

  • The facial displays of leaders: Toward an ethology of human politics.

    Roger D. Masters;Denis G. Sullivan;John T. Lanzetta;Gregory J. McHugo

  • Group Behavior Under Stress

    John T. Lanzetta

  • The behavior of leaders and other group members.

    Launor Carter;William Haythorn;Beatrice Shriver;John Lanzetta

  • An analysis of the encoding and decoding of spontaneous and posed smiles: The use of facial electromyography

    Ursula Hess;Arvid Kappas;Gregory J. McHugo;Robert E. Kleck

  • Vicarious instigation and conditioning of facial expressive and autonomic responses to a model's expressive display of pain.

    Unknown

  • Influence of facial expressions on the classical conditioning of fear.

    John T. Lanzetta;Scott P. Orr

  • Facial expressions of emotion as conditioned stimuli for human autonomic responses.

    Scott P. Orr;John T. Lanzetta

  • Conditioning of counter-empathetic emotional responses ☆

    Unknown

  • CONFLICT AND CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE AS DETERMINANTS OF DECISION-MAKING BEHAVIOR.

    Unknown

  • Preference for information about an uncertain but unavoidable outcome.

    Unknown

  • The Relation of Categorizations and Ratings in the Observation of Group Behavior

    Launor Carter;William Haythorn;Beatrice Meirowitz;John Lanzetta

  • A comparative experimental study of negotiation behavior.

    H. H. Kelley;M. Deutsch;J. T. Lanzetta;J. M. Nuttin Jr.

  • Effects of the expression of pain on autonomic and pain tolerance responses to subject-controlled pain.

    Carl Z. Colby;John T. Lanzetta;Robert E. Kleck

  • Considerations in the analysis of group tasks.

    Thornton B. Roby;John T. Lanzetta

  • Excitatory strength of expressive faces: Effects of happy and fear expressions and context on the extinction of a conditioned fear response.

    John T. Lanzetta;Scott P. Orr

  • The Relationship between Certain Group Process Variables and Group Problem-Solving Efficiency

    John T. Lanzetta;Thornton B. Roby

  • Vicarious instigation and conditioning of facial expressive and autonomic responses to a model's expressive display of pain

    Unknown

  • Effects of work-group structure and certain task variables on group performance.

    John T. Lanzetta;Thornton B. Roby

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up several online degree options and diverse professional pathways. Many students interested in this field also consider roles in social work due to their overlapping skills, shared commitment to mental health, and opportunities to make a real difference in people’s lives.

Social work is a regulated profession, and degree requirements vary depending on the state where you plan to practice. For example, you can review the social worker degree requirements in New Jersey, where a Bachelor's or Master's degree in Social Work is typically necessary. In New Mexico, the social worker education requirements in New Mexico emphasize accredited programs and supervised fieldwork.

Similarly, if you aim to launch your career in New York, make sure to understand the degree needed to be a social worker in New York. North Carolina also outlines specific academic and practical expectations in their social worker education requirements in North Carolina.

By researching and comparing state-specific requirements, prospective students can choose the best online degree programs and chart a personalized path toward a meaningful psychology or social work career.

Best Scientists Citing John T. Lanzetta