World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
J.H. McCaughey

J.H. McCaughey

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
8873
World Ranking
6665
National Ranking
297

J.H. McCaughey publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J.H. McCaughey sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 94 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

J.H. McCaughey D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J.H. McCaughey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

J.H. McCaughey was affiliated with Queen's University in Canada during their academic career. They contributed to the scientific community through their research and involvement in academia.

No specific details on research papers, co-authors, publication venues, or main fields and subfields of study are recorded.

There is no information available on book publications, awards won, or main topics of work associated with this scientist.

As McCaughey is deceased, their professional details are presented in the past tense to reflect their completed career.

Best Publications

  • Ecosystem carbon dioxide fluxes after disturbance in forests of North America

    B. D. Amiro;A. G. Barr;J. G. Barr;T. A. Black

  • A model-data comparison of gross primary productivity: Results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis

    Kevin Schaefer;Christopher R. Schwalm;Chris Williams;M. Altaf Arain

  • Comparing nocturnal eddy covariance measurements to estimates of ecosystem respiration made by scaling chamber measurements at six coniferous boreal sites

    M.B. Lavigne;M.G. Ryan;D.E. Anderson;D.D. Baldocchi

  • Carbon, energy and water fluxes at mature and disturbed forest sites, Saskatchewan, Canada

    Amiro Bd;Barr Ag;Black Ta;Iwashita H

  • How climate and vegetation type influence evapotranspiration and water use efficiency in Canadian forest, peatland and grassland ecosystems

    Christian Brümmer;T. Andrew Black;Rachhpal S. Jassal;Nicholas J. Grant

  • Ecophysiological controls on the carbon balances of three southern boreal forests

    T.J Griffis;T.A Black;K Morgenstern;A.G Barr

  • Surface energy balance closure by the eddy-covariance method above three boreal forest stands and implications for the measurement of the CO2 flux

    A.G. Barr;K. Morgenstern;T.A. Black;J.H. McCaughey

  • Relationship between ecosystem productivity and photosynthetically active radiation for northern peatlands

    S. E. Frolking;J. L. Bubier;T. R. Moore;T. Ball

  • Response of Net Ecosystem Productivity of Three Boreal Forest Stands to Drought

    N. Kljun;T. A. Black;Timothy J Griffis;A. G. Barr

  • The effect of post-fire stand age on the boreal forest energy balance

    B.D. Amiro;B.D. Amiro;A.L. Orchansky;A.G. Barr;T.A. Black

  • Seasonal trends in energy, water, and carbon dioxide fluxes at a northern boreal wetland

    Peter M. Lafleur;J. Harry McCaughey;David W. Joiner;Paul A. Bartlett

  • Use of change-point detection for friction–velocity threshold evaluation in eddy-covariance studies

    A.G. Barr;A.D. Richardson;D.Y. Hollinger;D. Papale

  • High temporal resolution NDVI phenology from micrometeorological radiation sensors

    K. F. Huemmrich;T. A. Black;P. G. Jarvis;J. H. McCaughey

  • Regional mapping of gross light-use efficiency using MODIS spectral indices

    G.G. Drolet;E.M. Middleton;K.F. Huemmrich;K.F. Huemmrich;F.G. Hall;F.G. Hall

  • Interannual variation of evapotranspiration from forest and grassland ecosystems in western canada in relation to drought

    Tianshan Zha;Alan G. Barr;Garth van der Kamp;T. Andy Black

  • Mapping stand-level forest biophysical variables for a mixedwood boreal forest using lidar: an examination of scanning density

    V Thomas;P Treitz;J H McCaughey;I Morrison

  • Temporal and spatial variability of soil respiration in a boreal mixedwood forest

    Myroslava Khomik;M. Altaf Arain;J.H. McCaughey

  • Response of Net Ecosystem Productivity of Three Boreal Forest Stands to Drought

    Unknown

  • Carbon sequestration in boreal jack pine stands following harvesting

    Tianshan Zha;Alan G. Barr;T. Andy Black;J. Harry McCAUGHEY

  • Energy balance closure at the BERMS flux towers in relation to the water balance of the White Gull Creek watershed 1999-2009

    A.G. Barr;G. van der Kamp;T.A. Black;J.H. McCaughey

  • Interannual variability in carbon dioxide exchanges at a boreal wetland in the BOREAS northern study area

    David W. Joiner;Peter M. Lafleur;J. Harry McCaughey;Paul A. Bartlett

  • Image classification of a northern peatland complex using spectral and plant community data

    Valerie Thomas;Paul Treitz;Dennis Jelinski;John Miller

  • Biosphere-atmosphere exchange of CO2 in relation to climate

    P. C. Stoy;A. D. Richardson;D. D. Baldocchi;G. G. Katul

Frequent Co-Authors

T. A. Black
T. A. Black University of British Columbia
Alan G. Barr
Alan G. Barr University of Saskatchewan
Hank A. Margolis
Hank A. Margolis National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Zoran Nesic
Zoran Nesic University of British Columbia
J. A. Trofymow
J. A. Trofymow University of Victoria
Andrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson Northern Arizona University
Beverly E. Law
Beverly E. Law Oregon State University
Natascha Kljun
Natascha Kljun Lund University
Leonardo Montagnani
Leonardo Montagnani Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
David Y. Hollinger
David Y. Hollinger US Forest Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education beyond a bachelor's or master's degree in Environmental Sciences, exploring online doctorate programs can be beneficial. Many professionals seek a doctorate degree online no dissertation, which offers a flexible path without the traditional dissertation requirement. These programs allow students to focus on practical application and leadership skills, ideal for careers in policy or education related to environmental fields.

Additionally, transitioning from a master's to a doctoral program is made easier with some of the best eds to edd programs. These pathways provide seamless continuation for educators or administrators seeking to enhance their expertise with a Doctor of Education, often applicable in environmental education and program development.

For those pursuing careers in social work with an environmental focus, affordable options exist. The cheapest dsw program offers an accessible route to earn a Doctorate in Social Work online, combining environmental advocacy with community support skills.

Lastly, if you want broad foundational knowledge or are considering a career pivot within environmental disciplines, an affordable online general studies degree can provide versatile academic grounding at a lower cost. This flexibility can be an asset when exploring interdisciplinary environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing J.H. McCaughey

Recently Published Articles