World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 155 945 542 792 104093

Jeremiah Stamler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeremiah Stamler between 1950 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeremiah Stamler published across 76 years, from 1950 to 2025, averaging 10.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 1997. 2 of the 799 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1950 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 1997. 1950: 14 publications 1951: 6 publications 1952: 8 publications 1953: 1 publication 1954: 6 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 5 publications 1957: 3 publications 1958: 12 publications 1959: 12 publications 1960: 8 publications 1961: 3 publications 1962: 3 publications 1963: 5 publications 1964: 4 publications 1965: 4 publications 1966: 6 publications 1967: 1 publication 1968: 1 publication 1969: 2 publications 1970: 6 publications 1971: 4 publications 1972: 9 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 10 publications 1976: 8 publications 1977: 7 publications 1978: 14 publications 1979: 19 publications 1980: 8 publications 1981: 13 publications 1982: 14 publications 1983: 20 publications 1984: 21 publications 1985: 15 publications 1986: 17 publications 1987: 20 publications 1988: 13 publications 1989: 22 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 27 publications 1992: 18 publications 1993: 16 publications 1994: 15 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 20 publications 1997: 30 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 22 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1950 2025

799 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeremiah Stamler: publications per year, 1950 to 2025
Year Publications
1950 14
1951 6
1952 8
1953 1
1954 6
1955 0
1956 5
1957 3
1958 12
1959 12
1960 8
1961 3
1962 3
1963 5
1964 4
1965 4
1966 6
1967 1
1968 1
1969 2
1970 6
1971 4
1972 9
1973 3
1974 4
1975 10
1976 8
1977 7
1978 14
1979 19
1980 8
1981 13
1982 14
1983 20
1984 21
1985 15
1986 17
1987 20
1988 13
1989 22
1990 10
1991 27
1992 18
1993 16
1994 15
1995 9
1996 20
1997 30
1998 13
1999 7
2000 13
2001 7
2002 6
2003 22
2004 13
2005 10
2006 17
2007 7
2008 14
2009 14
2010 8
2011 9
2012 23
2013 18
2014 16
2015 17
2016 15
2017 12
2018 8
2019 11
2020 11
2021 5
2022 5
2023 0
2024 0
2025 2
Total 799
Download as CSV

Jeremiah Stamler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremiah Stamler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 781–800 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 792 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217 792
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeremiah Stamler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeremiah Stamler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 154–155 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 155 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87 155
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Distinguished Scientist Award, American Heart Association
  • 1952 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Jeremiah Stamler was affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, nutrition and dietetics, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, molecular biology, and physiology.

Their publication record included a strong emphasis on nutritional studies and diet, metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, cardiovascular health and risk factors, diet and metabolism studies, sodium intake and health, fatty acid research and health, and consumer attitudes and food labeling.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Jeremiah Stamler included:

  • Identifying unknown metabolites using NMR-based metabolic profiling techniques (2020, Nature Protocols)
  • Nutriome-metabolome relationships provide insights into dietary intake and metabolism (2020, Nature Food)
  • Association between plant-based diets and blood pressure in the INTERMAP study (2020, BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health)
  • Blood pressure interactions with the DASH dietary pattern, sodium, and potassium: The International Study of Macro-/Micronutrients and Blood Pressure (INTERMAP) (2022, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition)
  • Food Sources of Dietary Potassium in the Adult Japanese Population: The International Study of Macro-/Micronutrients and Blood Pressure (INTERMAP) (2020, Nutrients)

Frequent co-authors included Queenie Chan, Paul Elliott, Martha L. Daviglus, Linda Van Horn, and Elaine Holmes, reflecting collaboration particularly in nutritional and cardiovascular research contexts.

Jeremiah Stamler's publications appeared predominantly in venues such as UNC Libraries, Nature Food, Circulation, Nature Protocols, and BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health.

Their career was recognized through various awards, including the Distinguished Scientist Award from the American Heart Association in 2004, being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1952, and membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial.

    Jeremiah Stamler;Olga Vaccaro;James D. Neaton;Deborah Wentworth

  • Blood pressure, stroke, and coronary heart disease: Part 1, prolonged differences in blood pressure: prospective observational studies corrected for the regression dilution bias

    S Macmahon;R Peto;J E Cutler;R Collins

  • Is relationship between serum cholesterol and risk of premature death from coronary heart disease continuous and graded? Findings in 356,222 primary screenees of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial (MRFIT).

    Jeremiah Stamler;Deborah Wentworth;James D. Neaton

  • Fifteen year mortality in Coronary Drug Project patients: Long-term benefit with niacin

    Paul L. Canner;Kenneth G. Berge;Nanette K. Wenger;Jeremiah Stamler

  • Clofibrate and Niacin in Coronary Heart Disease

    Jeremiah Stamler

  • Blood Pressure and End-Stage Renal Disease in Men

    Michael J. Klag;Paul K. Whelton;Bryan L. Randall;James D. Neaton

  • Intersalt: An international study of electrolyte excretion and blood pressure. Results for 24 hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion

    G. Rose;J. Stamler;R. Stamler;P. Elliott

  • Blood Pressure, Systolic and Diastolic, and Cardiovascular Risks: US Population Data

    Jeremiah Stamler;Rose Stamler;James D. Neaton

  • Intersalt: an international study of electrolyte excretion and blood pressure. Results for 24 hour urinary sodium and potassium excretion. Intersalt Cooperative Research Group.

    R Stamler;A Nissinen;U Uusitalo;G Rose

  • Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study: Final Results

    J D Neaton;R H Grimm;R J Prineas;J Stamler

  • Major Risk Factors as Antecedents of Fatal and Nonfatal Coronary Heart Disease Events

    Philip Greenland;Maria Deloria Knoll;Jeremiah Stamler;James D. Neaton

  • Effect of Diuretic-Based Antihypertensive Treatment on Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Older Diabetic Patients With Isolated Systolic Hypertension

    J. David Curb;Sara L. Pressel;Jeffrey A. Cutler;Peter J. Savage

  • Fish consumption and the 30-year risk of fatal myocardial infarction

    Martha L. Daviglus;Jeremiah Stamler;Anthony J. Orencia;Alan R. Dyer

  • Trends and Disparities in Coronary Heart Disease, Stroke, and Other Cardiovascular Diseases in the United States Findings of the National Conference on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention

    Richard Cooper;Jeffrey Cutler;Patrice Desvigne-Nickens;Stephen P. Fortmann

  • Human metabolic phenotype diversity and its association with diet and blood pressure

    Elaine Holmes;Ruey Leng Loo;Jeremiah Stamler;Magda Bictash

  • Intersalt revisited: further analyses of 24 hour sodium excretion and blood pressure within and across populations

    Paul Elliott;Jeremiah Stamler;Rob Nichols;Alan R Dyer

  • Low risk-factor profile and long-term cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality and life expectancy: findings for 5 large cohorts of young adult and middle-aged men and women.

    Jeremiah Stamler;Rose Stamler;James D. Neaton;Deborah Wentworth

  • Prevalence of major cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular diseases among Hispanic/Latino individuals of diverse backgrounds in the United States.

    Martha L. Daviglus;Martha L. Daviglus;Gregory A. Talavera;M. Larissa Avilés-Santa;Matthew Allison

  • Weight and blood pressure. Findings in hypertension screening of 1 million Americans

    Rose Stamler;Jeremiah Stamler;Wallace F. Riedlinger;George Algera

  • Blood pressure, systolic and diastolic, and cardiovascular risks

    Jeremiah Stamler;Rose Stamler;Jim Neaton

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Elliott
Paul Elliott Imperial College London
Martha L. Daviglus
Martha L. Daviglus University of Illinois at Chicago
Alan R. Dyer
Alan R. Dyer Northwestern University
Hirotsugu Ueshima
Hirotsugu Ueshima Shiga University of Medical Science
Kiang Liu
Kiang Liu Northwestern University
Katsuyuki Miura
Katsuyuki Miura Shiga University of Medical Science
Linda Van Horn
Linda Van Horn Northwestern University
James D. Neaton
James D. Neaton University of Minnesota
Elaine Holmes
Elaine Holmes Imperial College London
Philip Greenland
Philip Greenland Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have more options than ever for starting or advancing their healthcare careers through online education. For those interested in entering the administrative side of healthcare, the best online medical billing and coding schools offer flexible programs, oftentimes with financial aid, to help students gain in-demand technical skills.

If you’re considering patient care and want to avoid rigorous entrance exams, you can explore an lpn program no entrance exam requirement. This makes it easier for future nurses to get started quickly.

For those who already hold healthcare credentials or wish to move into leadership roles, pursuing online healthcare administration degree programs opens doors to management opportunities in clinics, hospitals, and other medical settings.

Registered nurses aiming for advanced practice can bridge the gap efficiently through specialized rn to np programs, allowing them to transition to nurse practitioner roles in less time.

Exploring these online pathways can help you find a career path that fits your goals and life circumstances, offering both flexibility and clear routes for professional growth in medicine and healthcare fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jeremiah Stamler

Recently Published Articles