World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
31
Citations
4456
World Ranking
2245
National Ranking
634

Jared E. Decker publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jared E. Decker sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 140 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

Jared E. Decker D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jared E. Decker sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Worldwide Patterns of Ancestry, Divergence, and Admixture in Domesticated Cattle

    Jared E. Decker;Stephanie D. McKay;Megan M. Rolf;Jae Woo Kim

  • Correction: Corrigendum: Gene expression differences in Longissimus muscle of Nelore steers genetically divergent for residual feed intake

    Polyana C. Tizioto;Luiz L. Coutinho;Priscila S. N. Oliveira;Aline S. M. Cesar

  • Resolving the evolution of extant and extinct ruminants with high-throughput phylogenomics

    Jared E. Decker;J. Chris Pires;Gavin C. Conant;Stephanie D. McKay

  • Accuracies of genomic breeding values in American Angus beef cattle using K-means clustering for cross-validation

    Mahdi Saatchi;Mathew C. McClure;Mathew C. McClure;Stephanie D. McKay;Megan M. Rolf

  • New World cattle show ancestry from multiple independent domestication events

    Emily Jane McTavish;Jared E. Decker;Robert D. Schnabel;Jeremy F. Taylor

  • Genome-wide association study for feed efficiency and growth traits in U.S. beef cattle

    Christopher M. Seabury;David L. Oldeschulte;Mahdi Saatchi;Jonathan E. Beever

  • Genome scan for meat quality traits in Nelore beef cattle.

    Polyana Cristine Tizioto;Jared E Decker;Jeremy F Taylor;Robert D Schnabel

  • Global liver gene expression differences in Nelore steers with divergent residual feed intake phenotypes

    Polyana Cristine Tizioto;Polyana Cristine Tizioto;Luiz Lehmann Coutinho;Jared E. Decker;Robert D. Schnabel

  • Early cave art and ancient DNA record the origin of European bison

    Julien Soubrier;Graham Gower;Kefei Chen;Stephen M. Richards

  • Gene expression differences in Longissimus muscle of Nelore steers genetically divergent for residual feed intake.

    Polyana C. Tizioto;Luiz L. Coutinho;Priscila S. N. Oliveira;Aline S. M. Cesar

  • QTLs associated with dry matter intake, metabolic mid-test weight, growth and feed efficiency have little overlap across 4 beef cattle studies.

    Mahdi Saatchi;Jonathan E. Beever;Jared E. Decker;Dan B. Faulkner

  • Genome-wide association analysis for quantitative trait loci influencing Warner-Bratzler shear force in five taurine cattle breeds.

    M. C. McClure;M. C. McClure;H. R. Ramey;M. M. Rolf;S. D. McKay

  • Powerful detection of polygenic selection and evidence of environmental adaptation in US beef cattle

    Troy N. Rowan;Harly J. Durbin;Christopher M. Seabury;Robert D. Schnabel

  • A multi-breed reference panel and additional rare variants maximize imputation accuracy in cattle

    Troy N. Rowan;Jesse L. Hoff;Tamar E. Crum;Jeremy F. Taylor

  • Genome-wide association and genotype by environment interactions for growth traits in U.S. Red Angus cattle

    Unknown

  • Genome-wide association and genotype by environment interactions for growth traits in U.S. Gelbvieh cattle.

    Johanna L. Smith;Miranda L. Wilson;Sara M. Nilson;Troy N. Rowan

  • Candidate lethal haplotypes and causal mutations in Angus cattle.

    Jesse L. Hoff;Jared E. Decker;Robert D. Schnabel;Jeremy F. Taylor

  • Applications and efficiencies of the first cat 63K DNA array

    Barbara Gandolfi;Hasan Alhaddad;Mona Abdi;Leslie H. Bach;Leslie H. Bach

  • Insight into the genetic composition of South African Sanga cattle using SNP data from cattle breeds worldwide

    Sithembile O. Makina;Lindsey K. Whitacre;Jared E. Decker;Jeremy F. Taylor

  • Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle

    Megan M Rolf;Dorian J Garrick;Tara Fountain;Holly R Ramey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Animal Science and Veterinary studies opens doors to a variety of rewarding career paths. For those interested in online education, finding accredited online colleges for drug and alcohol counseling can provide flexible options for specializing in animal-related behavioral issues. Counseling skills are valuable in fields such as animal-assisted therapy or working with pet owners.

Additionally, pursuing an online masters in marriage and family therapy can complement veterinary practice, particularly in holistic care that considers the human-animal bond. This interdisciplinary knowledge enhances communication and therapeutic approaches.

For professionals aiming at advanced expertise, enrolling in a phd in counseling online offers opportunities to conduct research or teach at higher levels. Such qualifications help broaden career prospects within veterinary schools or animal welfare organizations.

Finally, understanding the landscape of high paying jobs with animals is essential for making informed decisions. This knowledge guides students toward specialties that balance passion and financial stability in animal sciences and veterinary fields.

Recently Published Articles