World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
6871
World Ranking
8234
National Ranking
485

Jane Burns publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Burns sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 86 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jane Burns D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Burns sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane Burns is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research primarily spans across health professions and psychology with a focus on applied psychological methods and public health aspects. The scientist's work addresses a combination of general health professions, applied psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their research interests include key areas such as primary care and health outcomes, patient-provider communication in healthcare, patient satisfaction in healthcare, as well as mobile health and mHealth applications. Additionally, they investigate digital mental health interventions, telemedicine and telehealth implementation, and sleep and related disorders.

Recent publications by Jane Burns include:

  • Defining and implementing patient-centered care: An umbrella review (2021) in Patient Education and Counseling
  • Informing the Future of Integrated Digital and Clinical Mental Health Care: Synthesis of the Outcomes From Project Synergy (2022) in JMIR Mental Health
  • Genetic and environmental influences on sleep-wake behaviors in adolescence (2021) in SLEEP Advances
  • 16Up: Outline of a Study Investigating Wellbeing and Information and Communication Technology Use in Adolescent Twins (2020) in Twin Research and Human Genetics
  • Determinants of implementing reablement into research or practice: A concept mapping study (2022) in Physiotherapy Research International

Jane Burns regularly collaborates with several co-authors, including Ian B. Hickie, Sanya Grover, Farah Tabassum Azim, Patrocinio Ariza-Vega, and Elissa Burton. These collaborations have contributed to multiple publications in various venues.

Frequent publication venues for this scientist include:

  • Patient Education and Counseling
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • SLEEP Advances
  • Twin Research and Human Genetics
  • Physiotherapy Research International

Best Publications

  • Adolescent resilience: a concept analysis

    Craig A Olsson;Lyndal Bond;Jane M Burns;Dianne A Vella-Brodrick

  • The internet as a setting for mental health service utilisation by young people.

    Jane M Burns;Tracey A Davenport;Lauren A Durkin;Georgina M Luscombe

  • Building resilience in young people through meaningful participation

    Kylie G. Oliver;Philippa Collin;Jane Burns;Jonathan Nicholas

  • Lifetime Low-Level Exposure to Environmental Lead and Children's Emotional and Behavioral Development at Ages 11–13 Years: The Port Pirie Cohort Study

    J. M. Burns;P. A. Baghurst;M. G. Sawyer;A. J. McMichael

  • Young men’s attitudes and behaviour in relation to mental health and technology: implications for the development of online mental health services

    Louise A Ellis;Philippa Collin;Patrick J Hurley;Tracey A Davenport

  • Declining Blood Lead Levels and Changes in Cognitive Function During Childhood: The Port Pirie Cohort Study

    Shilu Tong;Peter A. Baghurst;Michael G. Sawyer;Jane Burns

  • Defining and implementing patient-centered care: An umbrella review.

    Sanya Grover;Aoife Fitzpatrick;Farah Tabassum Azim;Patrocinio Ariza-Vega

  • Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guideline for the management of deliberate self-harm.

    Gregory Carter;Andrew Page;Matthew Large;Sarah Hetrick

  • Providing online support for young people with mental health difficulties: challenges and opportunities explored

    Marianne Webb;Jane Burns;Philippa Collin

  • Social Environments and the Emotional Wellbeing of Young People

    Sarah Glover;Jane Burns;Helen Butler;George Patton

  • Mental Health of Young People in the United States: What Role Can the Internet Play in Reducing Stigma and Promoting Help Seeking?

    Jane M. Burns;Lauren A. Durkin;Jonathan Nicholas

  • Preventive interventions for youth suicide: A risk factor-based approach

    Jane M. Burns;George C. Patton

  • Enhancing early engagement with mental health services by young people.

    Jane Burns;Emma Birrell

  • Seeking drugs or seeking help? Escalating "doctor shopping" by young heroin users before fatal overdose

    Raymond F Martyres;Danielle Clode;Jane M Burns

  • Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Influence of social factors in determining length of hospital stay and readmission rates

    Alyson W. M. Wong;Wen Q. Gan;Jane Burns;Don D. Sin

  • "A conscious control over life and my emotions:" mindfulness practice and healthy young people. A qualitative study.

    Kaveh Monshat;Belinda Khong;Craig Stephen Hassed;Dianne Anne Vella-Brodrick

  • ReachOut.com: The role of an online service for promoting help-seeking in young people

    Philippa J Collin;Atari T Metcalf;Justine C Stephens-Reicher;Michelle E Blanchard

  • Preventing major depression in young people.

    Gavin Andrews;Marianna Szabo;Jane Burns

  • Clinical management of deliberate self-harm in young people: the need for evidence-based approaches to reduce repetition

    Jane Burns;Michael Dudley;Phillip Hazell;George Patton

  • Depression in young people: what causes it and can we prevent it?

    Jane M Burns;Gavin Andrews;Marianna Szabo

  • Declining Blood Lead Levels and Changes in Cognitive Function During Childhood

    Shilu Tong;Peter A. Baghurst;Michael G. Sawyer;Jane Burns

  • Adolescent health brief Mental Health of Young People in the United States: What Role Can the Internet Play in Reducing Stigma and Promoting Help Seeking?

    Jane M. Burns;Lauren A. Durkin;Jonathan Nicholas

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian B. Hickie
Ian B. Hickie University of Sydney
Tracey A Davenport
Tracey A Davenport University of Sydney
George C. Patton
George C. Patton Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Helen Christensen
Helen Christensen University of New South Wales
Michael G. Sawyer
Michael G. Sawyer University of Adelaide
Helen Herrman
Helen Herrman University of Melbourne
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Susan H. Spence
Susan H. Spence Griffith University
Shilu Tong
Shilu Tong Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Georgina Luscombe
Georgina Luscombe University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a wide range of career opportunities, especially in allied health fields. One popular pathway is becoming a Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP), a role that blends psychological principles with communication science to help individuals overcome language, speech, and swallowing disorders.

If you are interested in this career, requirements can vary significantly across states. For example, explore the slp requirements in New Mexico or read about how to become a speech language pathologist in New York to understand their specific steps.

Similarly, requirements may include state-specific licensure, accredited graduate degrees, and supervised clinical experiences, as highlighted in guides for how to become a speech language pathologist in North Carolina and how to become a speech language pathologist in North Dakota.

Many universities now offer online or hybrid degrees, making it easier for students to prepare for these rewarding careers. Choosing the right pathway depends on your state, professional goals, and preferred learning style.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Burns

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles