World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 64 3267 2986 59 56 213 14872

Jan Marcusson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jan Marcusson between 1972 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jan Marcusson published across 53 years, from 1972 to 2024, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2012. 1 of the 218 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2012. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 5 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1972 2024

218 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jan Marcusson: publications per year, 1972 to 2024
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 1
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 2
1981 0
1982 2
1983 1
1984 5
1985 4
1986 2
1987 4
1988 6
1989 5
1990 8
1991 2
1992 10
1993 1
1994 5
1995 0
1996 5
1997 4
1998 5
1999 5
2000 6
2001 6
2002 8
2003 6
2004 3
2005 5
2006 9
2007 1
2008 5
2009 6
2010 4
2011 7
2012 18
2013 13
2014 8
2015 7
2016 4
2017 1
2018 3
2019 7
2020 3
2021 2
2022 6
2023 0
2024 1
Total 218
Download as CSV

Jan Marcusson publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Marcusson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 213 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262 213
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Jan Marcusson D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Marcusson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278 64
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Jan Marcusson is a researcher affiliated with Linköping University in Sweden, specializing primarily in the field of Medicine with a focus on Geriatrics and Gerontology. Their research encompasses several subfields, including Economics and Econometrics, Physiology, Epidemiology, and General Health Professions. The core topics of Marcusson's work revolve around frailty in older adults, health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life, nutrition and health in aging, chronic disease management strategies, geriatric care and nursing homes, dementia and cognitive impairment research, and palliative care and end-of-life issues.

Their recent published papers include significant contributions to geriatrics and healthcare management such as:

  • "Prevalence Estimates of Amyloid Abnormality Across the Alzheimer Disease Clinical Spectrum," 2022, JAMA Neurology
  • "Costs and effects of comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care for older adults with high risk for hospitalisation," 2021, BMC Geriatrics
  • "Clinically useful prediction of hospital admissions in an older population," 2020, BMC Geriatrics
  • "Staff experiences of a new tool for comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care (PASTEL): a focus group study," 2020, Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
  • "Cost-Effectiveness of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Adapted to Primary Care," 2022, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Marcusson frequently collaborates with other researchers in related fields. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Magnus Nord
  • Johan Lyth
  • Huan-Ji Dong
  • Jenny Alwin
  • Anna Olaison

The main venues where Marcusson's work appears demonstrate a pattern of engagement with journals focusing on geriatrics and primary health care, notably:

  • BMC Geriatrics
  • Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
  • Research Square
  • JAMA Neurology
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association

Best Publications

  • Prevalence of cerebral amyloid pathology in persons without dementia: a meta-analysis.

    Willemijn J. Jansen;Rik Ossenkoppele;Dirk L. Knol;Betty M. Tijms

  • CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

    Niklas Mattsson;Henrik Zetterberg;Oskar Hansson;Niels Andreasen

  • An In Vitro Model for Neuroscience: Differentiation of SH-SY5Y Cells into Cells with Morphological and Biochemical Characteristics of Mature Neurons

    Lotta Agholme;Tobias Lindström;Katarina Kågedal;Jan Marcusson

  • Tau and Abeta42 in cerebrospinal fluid from healthy adults 21-93 years of age: establishment of reference values.

    Magnus Sjögren;Hugo Vanderstichele;Hans Ågren;Olof Zachrisson

  • The effect of age on the activity and molecular properties of human brain monoamine oxidase

    C. J. Fowler;Å. Wiberg;L. Oreland;J. Marcusson

  • Transmitter deficits in Alzheimer's disease.

    John Hardy;Rolf Adolfsson;Irina Alafuzoff;Gösta Bucht

  • The cerebrospinal fluid “Alzheimer profile”: Easily said, but what does it mean?

    Flora H. Duits;Charlotte E. Teunissen;Femke H. Bouwman;Pieter-Jelle Visser;Pieter-Jelle Visser

  • CSF-biomarkers in Olympic boxing: diagnosis and effects of repetitive head trauma.

    Sanna Neselius;Sanna Neselius;Helena Brisby;Helena Brisby;Annette Theodorsson;Kaj Blennow;Kaj Blennow

  • Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure.

    Ewa Wressle;Anne-Marie Eeg-Olofsson;Jan Marcusson;Chris Henriksson

  • Spreading of Neurodegenerative Pathology via Neuron-to-Neuron Transmission of β-Amyloid

    Sangeeta Nath;Lotta Agholme;Firoz Roshan Kurudenkandy;Björn Granseth

  • Age-correlated loss of dopaminergic binding sites in human basal ganglia.

    J. A. Severson;J. Marcusson;B. Winblad;C. E. Finch

  • Age and diagnostic performance of Alzheimer disease CSF biomarkers

    N. Mattsson;E. Rosen;O. Hansson;N. Andreasen

  • APOE ε4 allele is associated with reduced cerebrospinal fluid levels of Aβ42

    J.A Prince;H Zetterberg;N Andreasen;Jan Marcusson

  • Detection of Dementia in Primary Care : The Linköping Study

    María Ólafsdóttir;Ingemar Skoog;Jan Marcusson

  • High affinity [3H]paroxetine binding to serotonin uptake sites in human brain tissue.

    I Bäckström;M Bergström;J Marcusson

  • Brain 5-HT1A, 5-HT1D, and 5-HT2 Receptors in suicide victims

    Belén Arranz;Anders Eriksson;Erling Mellerup;Per Plenge

  • Spreading of amyloid-β peptides via neuritic cell-to-cell transfer is dependent on insufficient cellular clearance

    Jakob Domert;Sahana Bhima Rao;Lotta Agholme;Ann-Christin Brorsson

  • Adenylyl cyclase activity and G-protein subunit levels in postmortem frontal cortex of suicide victims.

    Richard F. Cowburn;Jan O. Marcusson;Anders Eriksson;Birgitta Wiehager

  • Olympic boxing is associated with elevated levels of the neuronal protein tau in plasma

    Sanna Neselius;Henrik Zetterberg;Kaj Blennow;Jeffrey Randall

  • Association of Cerebral Amyloid-β Aggregation With Cognitive Functioning in Persons Without Dementia.

    Willemijn J Jansen;Rik Ossenkoppele;Betty M Tijms;Anne M Fagan

  • CSFBiomarkersandIncipientAlzheimerDisease in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Niklas Mattsson;Henrik Zetterberg;Oskar Hansson;Niels Andreasen

Frequent Co-Authors

Kaj Blennow
Kaj Blennow University of Gothenburg
Henrik Zetterberg
Henrik Zetterberg University of Gothenburg
Bengt Winblad
Bengt Winblad Karolinska Institute
Anders Wallin
Anders Wallin University of Gothenburg
Alexei Terman
Alexei Terman Karolinska Institute
Lennart Minthon
Lennart Minthon Lund University
Pieter Jelle Visser
Pieter Jelle Visser Amsterdam University Medical Centers
Niels Andreasen
Niels Andreasen Karolinska University Hospital
Niklas Mattsson
Niklas Mattsson Lund University
Sanna-Kaisa Herukka
Sanna-Kaisa Herukka University of Eastern Finland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience doesn’t only pave the way for laboratory research or clinical roles. Many students find rewarding opportunities in counseling, psychology, and therapy-related careers that benefit from a neuroscience background. Online programs offer flexible pathways to gain qualifications, making advanced education more accessible.

Interested in counseling? Earning a cacrep online masters in counseling is a valuable way to blend neuroscience insights and practical skills, opening doors to mental health professions. If affordability is a concern, several cheapest online counseling degree options help minimize student debt.

For those interested in helping families and couples, a masters in marriage and family therapy online offers a specialized focus with online flexibility. Alternatively, a graduate degree in psychology opens up many versatile roles; and if you’re wondering about affordability, see how much does masters in psychology cost for a detailed look at the investment required.

Whichever path you choose, combining neuroscience with counseling or psychology sets the stage for impactful and diverse career possibilities in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Marcusson

Trending Scientists