World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
39
Citations
9028
World Ranking
5560
National Ranking
2635

James Shanteau publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Shanteau sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

James Shanteau D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Shanteau sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

James Shanteau is affiliated with Kansas State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Decision Sciences and Computer Science, with a focus on various subfields such as General Decision Sciences, Artificial Intelligence, and Management Science and Operations Research.

The topics central to Shanteau's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics, Cognitive Science and Mapping, as well as Complex Systems and Decision Making. These areas reflect a multidisciplinary approach integrating psychology, economics, and computational methods.

Shanteau has contributed scholarly articles to peer-reviewed academic journals. Among recent publications is a paper titled The futility of decision making research, published in 2021 in Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. This article further highlights the historical and philosophical aspects of decision research.

  • The futility of decision making research, 2021, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

Frequent collaborations are evident in Shanteau's work, notably with David J. Weiss, who has co-authored at least one publication together. The connection with Weiss suggests engagement with colleagues active in the philosophy and science of decision-making processes.

  • David J. Weiss

Shanteau's publications have appeared mainly in the journal Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, which emphasizes the historical and philosophical examination of scientific practices. This venue aligns with Shanteau's interest in the theoretical foundations and implications of decision-making research.

  • Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A

Best Publications

  • Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics☆☆☆

    James Shanteau

  • Psychological characteristics of expert decision makers

    James Shanteau

  • How much information does an expert use? Is it relevant?

    James Shanteau

  • Psychological characteristics and strategies of expert decision makers

    James Shanteau

  • Performance-based assessment of expertise: How to decide if someone is an expert or not

    James Shanteau;David J Weiss;Rickey P Thomas;Julia C Pounds

  • Livestock judges: How much information can an expert use?

    Ruth H. Phelps;James Shanteau

  • Why study expert decision making? Some historical perspectives and comments.

    James Shanteau;Thomas R Stewart

  • Empirical assessment of expertise.

    David J. Weiss;James Shanteau

  • Information integration in risky decision making

    Norman H. Anderson;James C. Shanteau

  • The Psychology of Experts An Alternative View

    James Shanteau

  • Reducing the influence of irrelevant information on experienced decision makers

    Gary J. Gaeth;James Shanteau

  • Personal attributes of expert auditors

    Mohammad J Abdolmohammadi;James Shanteau

  • An additive model for sequential decision making.

    James C. Shanteau

  • Do Consumers Evaluate Products by Adding or Averaging Attribute Information

    C. Michael Troutman;James Shanteau

  • Weak inference with linear models.

    Norman H. Anderson;James Shanteau

  • COGNITIVE HEURISTICS AND BIASES IN BEHAVIORAL AUDITING: REVIEW, COMMENTS AND OBSERVATIONS

    James Shanteau

  • Component processes in risky decision making.

    James Shanteau

  • An information processing view of framing effects: The role of causal schemas in decision making

    Jerwen Jou;James Shanteau;Richard Jackson Harris

  • The effect of violent and non-violent computer games on cognitive performance

    Christopher P. Barlett;Christopher L. Vowels;James Shanteau;Janis Crow

  • Inferences based on nondiagnostic information

    C.Michael Troutman;James Shanteau

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Jackson Harris
Richard Jackson Harris Kansas State University
Norman H. Anderson
Norman H. Anderson University of California, San Diego
Ward Edwards
Ward Edwards University of Southern California
Mary Frances Luce
Mary Frances Luce Duke University
Gary Klein
Gary Klein MacroCognition LLC
Alice M. Isen
Alice M. Isen Cornell University
Christopher P. Barlett
Christopher P. Barlett Kansas State University
Irwin P. Levin
Irwin P. Levin University of Iowa
Kenneth R. Hammond
Kenneth R. Hammond University of Colorado Boulder
Joeri Hofmans
Joeri Hofmans Vrije Universiteit Brussel

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities can open up diverse career pathways, including social work, behavioral analysis, research, and public service. Today, more students are choosing flexible study options such as 1 year master's programs online, which allow professionals to upskill and advance their careers quickly.

For those needing an even faster route to a degree, online accelerated programs help students earn bachelor’s degrees in less time, making it easier to enter the workforce or pursue graduate studies sooner. Cost is also an important consideration; prospective social workers can find flexible and affordable online MSW programs that open doors to meaningful occupations in various sectors.

Those interested in behavior analysis might consider specialized online degrees such as bcba masters programs online, providing qualifications for advanced roles in education, healthcare, or counseling. With so many online options, finding a program that matches your time, budget, and career goals has never been easier.

Best Scientists Citing James Shanteau

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles