World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
47
Citations
12285
World Ranking
6075
National Ranking
3299

Kenneth R. Hammond publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth R. Hammond sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kenneth R. Hammond D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth R. Hammond sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth R. Hammond was affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research primarily focused on the intersections of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, immunology, microbiology, and environmental science. Their work contributed to several subfields including molecular biology, microbiology, health, toxicology and mutagenesis, atomic and molecular physics and optics, as well as ecology.

The scientist's research centered on a variety of main topics such as antimicrobial peptides and activities, lipid membrane structure and behavior, biochemical and structural characterization, air quality and health impacts, force microscopy techniques and applications, bacteriophages and microbial interactions, and bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing.

Among frequent coauthors were Maxim G. Ryadnov, Bart W. Hoogenboom, Kareem Al Nahas, Jehangir Cama, and Marcus Fletcher, indicating ongoing collaborations with researchers active in related fields.

Publications by Kenneth R. Hammond appeared in a number of scientific venues, including:

  • ACS Nano
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
  • Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
  • iScience

Key papers published by the scientist were:

  • "Atomic force microscopy to elucidate how peptides disrupt membranes," 2020, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes
  • "Flowering Poration-A Synergistic Multi-Mode Antibacterial Mechanism by a Bacteriocin Fold," 2020, iScience
  • "Switching Cytolytic Nanopores into Antimicrobial Fractal Ruptures by a Single Side Chain Mutation," 2021, ACS Nano
  • "Measuring Thousands of Single-Vesicle Leakage Events Reveals the Mode of Action of Antimicrobial Peptides," 2022, Analytical Chemistry
  • "An ultrasensitive microfluidic approach reveals correlations between the physico-chemical and biological activity of experimental peptide antibiotics," 2022, Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Human Judgment and Social Policy: Irreducible Uncertainty, Inevitable Error, Unavoidable Injustice

    Kenneth R. Hammond

  • Probabilistic functioning and the clinical method.

    Kenneth R. Hammond

  • 10 – SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY

    Kenneth R. Hammond;Thomas R. Stewart;Berndt Brehmer;Derick O. Steinmann

  • The essential brunswik: Beginnings, explications, applications.

    Egon Brunswik;Kenneth R. Hammond;Thomas R. Stewart

  • Human Judgment and Decision Making: Theories, Methods, and Procedures

    Nancy Pennington;Kenneth R. Hammond;Gary H. McClelland;Jeryl Mumpower

  • ANALYZING THE COMPONENTS OF CLINICAL INFERENCE.

    Kenneth R. Hammond;Carolyn J. Hursch;Frederick J. Todd

  • Some methodological considerations in multiple-cue probability studies

    Carolyn J. Hursch;Kenneth R. Hammond;Jack L. Hursch

  • Human judgment and social policy

    Kenneth R. Hammond

  • Judgments under stress

    Kenneth R. Hammond

  • Science, values, and human judgment.

    Kenneth R. Hammond;Leonard Adelman

  • The psychology of Egon Brunswik

    Kenneth R. Hammond;Egon Brunswik

  • Cognitive dependence on linear and nonlinear cues

    Kenneth R. Hammond;David A. Summers

  • New Directions in Research on Conflict Resolution

    Kenneth R. Hammond

  • Computer Graphics as an Aid to Learning

    Kenneth R. Hammond

  • Negative effects of outcome-feedback in multiple-cue probability learning.

    Kenneth R. Hammond;David A. Summers;Donald H. Deane

  • Beyond Rationality: The Search for Wisdom in a Troubled Time

    Kenneth R. Hammond

  • 1 – SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY: APPLICATIONS IN POLICY FORMATION

    Kenneth R Hammond;John Rohrbaugh;Jeryl Mompower;Leonard Adelman

  • Judgement and Decision Making in Dynamic Tasks

    Kenneth R. Hammond

  • The Application of Signal Detection Theory to Weather Forecasting Behavior

    Lewis O. Harvey;Kenneth R. Hammond;Cynthia M. Lusk;Ernest F. Mross

  • Direct comparison of the relative efficiency on intuitive and analytical cognition

    K. R. Hammond;R. M. Hamm;J. Grassia;T. Pearson

  • A framework for the unification of the behavioral sciences. Commentaries. Author's reply

    Herbert Gintis;George Ainslie;Larry Arnhart;R. Alexander Bentley

Frequent Co-Authors

Reid Hastie
Reid Hastie University of Chicago
Andrew M. Colman
Andrew M. Colman University of Leicester
Richard Jessor
Richard Jessor University of Colorado Boulder
Aurelio José Figueredo
Aurelio José Figueredo University of Arizona
Leda Cosmides
Leda Cosmides University of California, Santa Barbara
John Tooby
John Tooby University of California, Santa Barbara
Keith E. Stanovich
Keith E. Stanovich University of Toronto
Arthur B. Markman
Arthur B. Markman The University of Texas at Austin
Joachim I. Krueger
Joachim I. Krueger Brown University
David N. Kennedy
David N. Kennedy University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in psychology, exploring related online degrees such as social work is a smart move. Social work shares many foundational skills with psychology, including client assessment, advocacy, and supporting individuals through challenges.

Many accredited universities offer excellent online programs. If you're considering a regional option, you might explore the best online social work degree programs in Ohio, which stand out for their practical curriculum and support services. Similarly, the best online social work degree programs in Texas offer flexible scheduling ideal for working adults.

For a national perspective, check out the best online social work programs in the US to compare institutions, specializations, and outcomes. Those interested in specific regions can also review the top online social work programs in Waco, known for their community-focused training.

Pursuing a social work degree online can open doors to various career pathways, including counseling, healthcare, education, and non-profit sectors, making it a versatile adjunct or alternative to traditional psychology studies.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth R. Hammond