World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
60
Citations
14745
World Ranking
3807
National Ranking
1741

James Jerger publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Jerger sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 307 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James Jerger D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James Jerger sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James Jerger was affiliated with The University of Texas at Dallas in the United States during their academic career. Their work included contributions primarily in the field of audiology, as reflected by their publications and research focus.

Jerger authored a notable recent paper titled First Doctoral Degree Programs in Audiology in the U.S.A., published in 2021 in the Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. This publication addressed the development and structure of doctoral programs within the field of audiology in the United States.

Their publications were concentrated in the Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, which was also the venue for their noted 2021 paper. There are no records of frequent coauthors listed for Jerger.

  • Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Jerger's documented research topics and specific fields of study beyond audiology were not detailed extensively in the available source data. There were likewise no records of book publications or awards attributed to Jerger during their career.

Throughout their career, Jerger contributed to research documenting educational advancements and structural analysis within audiology doctoral programs. Their work is recorded in scientific literature for its focus on academic program development rather than specific clinical or experimental audiology research.

Best Publications

  • Clinical experience with impedance audiometry.

    James Jerger

  • Preferred Method For Clinical Determination Of Pure-Tone Thresholds

    Raymond Carhart;James F. Jerger

  • Report of the Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis of Auditory Processing Disorders in School-Aged Children.

    Jerger J;Musiek F

  • Studies in impedance audiometry. I. Normal and sensorineural ears.

    James Jerger;Susan Jerger;Larry Mauldin

  • Effects of age and sex on auditory brainstem response

    James Jerger;James Hall

  • Bekesy Audiometry in Analysis of Auditory Disorders

    James Jerger

  • Some effects of aging on central auditory processing.

    Jeffrey S. Martin;James F. Jerger

  • Speech Understanding in the Elderly

    James Jerger;Susan Jerger;Terrey Oliver;Francis Pirozzolo

  • A new approach to speech audiometry.

    James Jerger;Charles Speaks;Jane L. Trammell

  • Diagnostic Significance of PB Word Functions

    James Jerger;Susan Jerger

  • Auditory dysfunction in traumatic brain injury.

    Henry L Lew;James F Jerger;Sylvia B Guillory;James A Henry

  • Effects of age and gender on dichotic sentence identification

    James Jerger;Rose Chmiel;John Allen;Amy Wilson

  • On the detection of extremely small changes in sound intensity.

    James Jerger;Joyce Lassman Shedd;Earl Harford

  • Auditory findings in brain stem disorders.

    James Jerger;Susan Jerger

  • Interactions of age, gender, and sensorineural hearing loss on ABR latency.

    James Jerger;Karen Johnson

  • Development of a dichotic sentence identification test for hearing-impaired adults.

    Robert C. Fifer;James F. Jerger;Charles I. Berlin;Emily A. Tobey

  • The Cross-Check Principle in Pediatric Audiometry

    James F. Jerger;Deborah Hayes

  • Studies in Impedance Audiometry: III. Middle Ear Disorders

    James Jerger;Lois Anthony;Susan Jerger;Larry Mauldin

  • Correlational analysis of speech audiometric scores, hearing loss, age, and cognitive abilities in the elderly.

    James Jerger;Susan Jerger;Francis Pirozzolo

  • Gender affects audiometric shape in presbyacusis.

    J Jerger;R Chmiel;B Stach;M Spretnjak

  • The prevalence of central presbyacusis in a clinical population.

    B A Stach;M L Spretnjak;J Jerger

  • Modern developments in audiology

    James Jerger

Frequent Co-Authors

Karen C. Johnson
Karen C. Johnson University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Randi C. Martin
Randi C. Martin Rice University
Louise Hickson
Louise Hickson University of Queensland
Charles D. Bluestone
Charles D. Bluestone University of Pittsburgh
Joseph Jankovic
Joseph Jankovic Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience can open doors to a variety of engaging careers and further academic pursuits. Many students interested in the brain and behavior choose related paths such as psychology, counseling, or social work. Pursuing an online degree in psychology is a valuable and flexible option for building expertise in mental health, development, and cognition.

Those seeking advanced training often consider an online masters psychology program. These programs can lead to specialized roles in counseling, research, or education. For students drawn to therapeutic practice, mft programs offer essential preparation for working with couples and families in clinical settings.

Additionally, a 1 year online master's in social work can lead to rewarding positions in advocacy, mental health, and community support. Each of these online degrees provides unique pathways closely aligned with neuroscience, helping you shape a career that makes a lasting impact.

Best Scientists Citing James Jerger

Recently Published Articles