World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
James J. McCarthy

James J. McCarthy

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
57
Citations
22937
World Ranking
3355
National Ranking
1291

James J. McCarthy publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James J. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 102 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

James J. McCarthy D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James J. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

James J. McCarthy was affiliated with Harvard University in the United States. Their research work spanned several main fields, including Medicine, Social Sciences, and Environmental Science, with notable subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Emergency Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery, and Neurology.

The scientist contributed scholarly work on a variety of topics. These encompassed:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Energy and Environment Impacts
  • Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
  • Environmental Justice and Health Disparities
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

They published papers in notable venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
  • New England Journal of Medicine
  • Journal of Neurotrauma
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • The AAG Review of Books

Recent publications included:

  • "Prospective, Multicenter, Controlled Trial of Mobile Stroke Units," 2021, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Early versus Late Profiles of Inflammatory Cytokines after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Their Association with Neuropsychological Outcomes," 2020, Journal of Neurotrauma
  • "New political ecologies of renewable energy," 2022, Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
  • "(Counter)mapping renewables: Space, justice, and politics of wind and solar power in Mexico," 2021, Environment and Planning E Nature and Space
  • "Prehospital Activation of Hospital Resources (PreAct) ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI): A Standardized Approach to Prehospital Activation and Direct to the Catheterization Laboratory for STEMI Recommendations From the American Heart Association's Mission: Lifeline Program," 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association

Their research collaboration involved frequent coauthors, including:

  • José-Miguel Yamal
  • David Persse
  • Dylan M. Harris
  • Kelsey Porada
  • Tiffany Small

Best Publications

  • A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science

    B. L. Turner;Roger E. Kasperson;Roger E. Kasperson;Pamela A. Matson;James J. McCarthy

  • Environment and development. Sustainability science.

    Kates Rw;Clark Wc;Corell R;Hall Jm

  • HALF‐SATURATION CONSTANTS FOR UPTAKE OF NITRATE AND AMMONIUM BY MARINE PHYTOPLANKTON1

    Richard W. Eppley;Jane N. Rogers;James J. McCarthy

  • Growth rate influence on the chemical composition of phytoplankton in oceanic waters

    Joel C. Goldman;James J. McCarthy;Dwight G. Peavey

  • Temperature effects on export production in the open ocean

    Edward A. Laws;Paul G. Falkowski;Walker O. Smith;Hugh Ducklow

  • Illustrating the coupled human-environment system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies.

    B. L. Turner;Pamela A. Matson;James J. McCarthy;Robert W. Corell

  • Whales as marine ecosystem engineers.

    Joe Roman;James A Estes;Lyne Morissette;Craig Smith

  • Nitrogenous nutrition of the plankton in the Chesapeake Bay. 1. Nutrient availability and phytoplankton preferences

    Unknown

  • Iron and grazing constraints on primary production in the central equatorial Pacific: An EqPac synthesis

    Michael R. Lundry;Richard T. Barber;Robert R. Bidare;Fei Chai

  • Nitrogenous Nutrition of Marine Phytoplankton in Nutrient-Depleted Waters

    James J. Mccarthy;Joel C. Goldman

  • Isotope dilution models of uptake and remineralization of ammonium by marine plankton1

    Patricia M. Gilbert;Fredric Lipschultz;James J. McCarthy;Mark A. Altabet

  • The Whale Pump: Marine Mammals Enhance Primary Productivity in a Coastal Basin

    Joe Roman;James J. McCarthy

  • Steady state growth and ammonium uptake of a fast‐growing marine diatom 1

    Joel C. Goldman;James J. McCarthy

  • Saami reindeer pastoralism under climate change: Applying a generalized framework for vulnerability studies to a sub-arctic social–ecological system

    Unknown

  • Export flux of particulate organic carbon from the central equatorial Pacific determined using a combined drifting trap-234Th approach

    James W. Murray;Jennifer Young;Jan Newton;John Dunne

  • The Uptake of Urea by Natural Populations of Marine PHYTOPLANKTON1

    Unknown

  • Isotopic fractionation during nitrate uptake by phytoplankton grown in continuous culture

    Joseph P. Montoya;James J. McCarthy

  • Utilization of ammonium and nitrate during austral summer in the Scotia Sea

    Patricia M. Glibert;Douglas C. Biggs;James J. McCarthy

  • Baleen whales host a unique gut microbiome with similarities to both carnivores and herbivores.

    Jon G. Sanders;Annabel C. Beichman;Joe Roman;Joe Roman;Jarrod J. Scott

  • New production along 140°W in the equatorial Pacific during and following the 1992 El Niño event

    James J McCarthy;Chris Garside;John L Nevins;Richard T Barber

  • LIGHT/DARK PERIODICITY IN NITROGEN ASSIMILATION OF THE MARINE PHYTOPLANKTERS SKELETONEMA COSTATUM AND COCCOLITHUS HUXLEYI IN N‐LIMITED CHEMOSTAT CULTURE1,2

    Richard W. Eppley;Jane N. Rogers;James J. McCarthy;Alain Sournia

  • PHYTOPLANKTON GROWTH AND COMPOSITION IN SHIPBOARD CULTURES SUPPLIED WITH NITRATE, AMMONIUM, OR UREA AS THE NITROGEN SOURCE1

    R. W. Eppley;A. F. Carlucci;O. Holm-Hansen;D. Kiefer

  • Temporal and spatial variations in the natural abundance of 15N in PON from a warm-core ring

    Mark A. Altabet;James J. McCarthy

Frequent Co-Authors

Allan R. Robinson
Allan R. Robinson Harvard University
Terrence M. Joyce
Terrence M. Joyce Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Patricia M. Glibert
Patricia M. Glibert University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Joseph P. Montoya
Joseph P. Montoya Georgia Institute of Technology
John P. Dunne
John P. Dunne Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
William C. Clark
William C. Clark Harvard University
James W. Murray
James W. Murray University of Washington
Tom Berman
Tom Berman National Institute of Oceanography
Dennis J. McGillicuddy
Dennis J. McGillicuddy Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Peter H. Wiebe
Peter H. Wiebe Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Programs like the online eds to edd bridge program offer a strong foundation for those aiming to combine environmental expertise with educational leadership roles.

Additionally, pursuing advanced degrees such as dsw online programs can empower students to work on social justice and environmental policies, merging social work with environmental advocacy.

For those seeking flexible options, an accredited affordable online general studies degree provides a versatile platform to build customized study plans that include environmental topics alongside other disciplines.

Finally, individuals looking for accessible entry points into higher education should consider the easiest bachelor degree options, which can help jumpstart careers related to environmental sciences with manageable coursework.

Best Scientists Citing James J. McCarthy

Recently Published Articles