World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hiroshi Hashizume

Hiroshi Hashizume

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8288 7741 24 23 94 6098

Hiroshi Hashizume publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hiroshi Hashizume between 2009 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hiroshi Hashizume published across 16 years, from 2009 to 2024, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2015. 1 of the 95 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2015. 2009: 12 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
2009 2024

95 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hiroshi Hashizume: publications per year, 2009 to 2024
Year Publications
2009 12
2010 7
2011 11
2012 10
2013 14
2014 13
2015 21
2016 5
2017 1
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 95
Download as CSV

Hiroshi Hashizume publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hiroshi Hashizume sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 94
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Hiroshi Hashizume D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hiroshi Hashizume sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Hiroshi Hashizume is affiliated with Tohoku University in Japan and has an extensive research portfolio primarily in the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work focuses on a range of topics related to musculoskeletal health, particularly concerning spinal conditions and pain management.

The main fields and subfields covered by their research include:

  • Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Pharmacology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering

Key topics central to their work consist of:

  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
  • Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
  • Hip disorders and treatments
  • Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries

Their recent published papers include:

  • "Epidemiology of locomotive syndrome using updated clinical decision limits: 6-year follow-ups of the ROAD study," 2022, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism
  • "Association between types of Modic changes in the lumbar region and low back pain in a large cohort: the Wakayama spine study," 2020, European Spine Journal
  • "Relationship of sagittal spinal alignment with low back pain and physical performance in the general population," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Lumbar high-intensity zones on MRI: imaging biomarkers for severe, prolonged low back pain and sciatica in a population-based cohort," 2020, The Spine Journal
  • "Could automated machine-learned MRI grading aid epidemiological studies of lumbar spinal stenosis? Validation within the Wakayama spine study," 2020, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Hiroshi Hashizume include:

  • Hiroshi Yamada
  • Masanari Takami
  • Shunji Tsutsui
  • Hiroyuki Oka
  • Hiroshi Iwasaki

Hiroshi Hashizume's work is frequently published in journals such as:

  • Spine Surgery and Related Research
  • European Spine Journal
  • Scientific Reports
  • Research Square
  • BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Best Publications

  • Brain Training Game Improves Executive Functions and Processing Speed in the Elderly: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Rui Nouchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Hikaru Takeuchi;Hiroshi Hashizume

  • Failing to deactivate: the association between brain activity during a working memory task and creativity.

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Hiroshi Hashizume;Yuko Sassa

  • Brain training game boosts executive functions, working memory and processing speed in the young adults: a randomized controlled trial

    Rui Nouchi;Rui Nouchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Hikaru Takeuchi;Hiroshi Hashizume

  • Regional gray matter volume of dopaminergic system associate with creativity: evidence from voxel-based morphometry.

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Yuko Sassa;Hiroshi Hashizume

  • The Association between Resting Functional Connectivity and Creativity

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Hiroshi Hashizume;Yuko Sassa

  • White matter structures associated with creativity: evidence from diffusion tensor imaging.

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Yuko Sassa;Hiroshi Hashizume

  • Topological organization of functional brain networks in healthy children: differences in relation to age, sex, and intelligence.

    Kai Wu;Kai Wu;Yasuyuki Taki;Kazunori Sato;Hiroshi Hashizume

  • Working memory training using mental calculation impacts regional gray matter of the frontal and parietal regions

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Yuko Sassa;Hiroshi Hashizume

  • Effects of working memory training on functional connectivity and cerebral blood flow during rest.

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Rui Nouchi;Hiroshi Hashizume

  • Effects of Training of Processing Speed on Neural Systems

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Hiroshi Hashizume;Yuko Sassa

  • The Impact of Television Viewing on Brain Structures: Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Hiroshi Hashizume;Kohei Asano

  • Regional gray matter density associated with emotional intelligence: Evidence from voxel‐based morphometry

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Yuko Sassa;Hiroshi Hashizume

  • Brain structures associated with executive functions during everyday events in a non-clinical sample

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Yuko Sassa;Hiroshi Hashizume

  • Sleep duration during weekdays affects hippocampal gray matter volume in healthy children

    Yasuyuki Taki;Hiroshi Hashizume;Benjamin Thyreau;Yuko Sassa

  • Four weeks of combination exercise training improved executive functions, episodic memory, and processing speed in healthy elderly people: evidence from a randomized controlled trial

    Rui Nouchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Hikaru Takeuchi;Atsushi Sekiguchi

  • Breakfast Staple Types Affect Brain Gray Matter Volume and Cognitive Function in Healthy Children

    Yasuyuki Taki;Hiroshi Hashizume;Yuko Sassa;Hikaru Takeuchi

  • Regional gray and white matter volume associated with Stroop interference: evidence from voxel-based morphometry.

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Yuko Sassa;Hiroshi Hashizume

  • Correlation between gray matter density-adjusted brain perfusion and age using brain MR images of 202 healthy children.

    Yasuyuki Taki;Hiroshi Hashizume;Yuko Sassa;Hikaru Takeuchi

  • Regional gray matter density is associated with achievement motivation: evidence from voxel-based morphometry.

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Rui Nouchi;Rui Nouchi;Atsushi Sekiguchi

  • Cerebral blood flow during rest associates with general intelligence and creativity.

    Hikaru Takeuchi;Yasuyuki Taki;Hiroshi Hashizume;Yuko Sassa

  • Correlation among body height, intelligence, and brain gray matter volume in healthy children.

    Yasuyuki Taki;Hiroshi Hashizume;Yuko Sassa;Hikaru Takeuchi

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryuta Kawashima
Ryuta Kawashima Tohoku University
Yasuyuki Taki
Yasuyuki Taki Tohoku University
Hikaru Takeuchi
Hikaru Takeuchi Tohoku University
Yuko Sassa
Yuko Sassa Tohoku University
Rui Nouchi
Rui Nouchi University of Human Environments
Motoaki Sugiura
Motoaki Sugiura Tohoku University
Yong He
Yong He Beijing Normal University
Hiroshi Fukuda
Hiroshi Fukuda Tohoku University
Alan C. Evans
Alan C. Evans McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're studying psychology in the USA, numerous online degree programs can open doors to meaningful career pathways in mental health. Many aspiring professionals pursue a master's or doctoral degree to qualify for specialized roles such as mental health counselor, therapist, or clinical psychologist.

To work in specific locations, you’ll need to meet local licensure requirements. For example, to become a mental health counselor in San Jose, candidates must complete a graduate degree and gain supervised experience. Similarly, become a mental health counselor in Scottsdale by following Arizona’s licensing process, which involves comparable academic and training standards.

It’s important to understand the Seattle mental health counselor education requirements if you’re considering practicing in Washington State. In California, the Santa Ana mental health counselor certification requirements highlight the need for specific coursework and clinical hours.

Online psychology and counseling degrees can help you start a flexible, rewarding career. Always check local licensing rules to ensure your education meets your state’s professional standards.

Best Scientists Citing Hiroshi Hashizume

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles