World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
32
Citations
4903
World Ranking
3167
National Ranking
1269

H. M. James Hung publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. M. James Hung sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 120 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

H. M. James Hung D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H. M. James Hung sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • 2017 Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint Definitions for Clinical Trials.

    Karen A. Hicks;Kenneth W. Mahaffey;Roxana Mehran;Steven E. Nissen

  • MMRM vs. LOCF: A Comprehensive Comparison Based on Simulation Study and 25 NDA Datasets

    Unknown

  • The Behavior of the P-Value When the Alternative Hypothesis is True

    Unknown

  • Approaches to evaluation of treatment effect in randomized clinical trials with genomic subset

    Unknown

  • Some fundamental issues with non‐inferiority testing in active controlled trials

    Unknown

  • Estimation methods for time‐dependent AUC models with survival data

    Unknown

  • Adaptive patient enrichment designs in therapeutic trials

    Unknown

  • A Regulatory Perspective on Choice of Margin and Statistical Inference Issue in Non‐inferiority Trials

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of performance of some enrichment designs dealing with high placebo response in psychiatric clinical trials

    Unknown

  • Utility and pitfalls of some statistical methods in active controlled clinical trials

    Unknown

  • Group sequential test strategies for superiority and non‐inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials

    Unknown

  • ISSUES RELATED TO SUBGROUP ANALYSIS IN CLINICAL TRIALS

    Unknown

  • Matrix variate logistic regression model with application to EEG data

    Unknown

  • A Regulatory View on Adaptive/Flexible Clinical Trial Design

    Unknown

  • Statistical Considerations for Testing Multiple Endpoints in Group Sequential or Adaptive Clinical Trials

    Unknown

  • Adapting the sample size planning of a phase III trial based on phase II data

    Unknown

  • Consideration of regional difference in design and analysis of multi‐regional trials

    Unknown

  • Challenges and regulatory experiences with non‐inferiority trial design without placebo arm

    Unknown

  • Trial design issues and treatment effect modeling in multi‐regional schizophrenia trials

    Unknown

  • Estimation and Confidence Intervals after Adjusting the Maximum Information

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Mathematics in the USA, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Fields like business, finance, and marketing often value strong analytical and quantitative skills, making complementary online degrees an excellent investment.

If you're interested in executive-level roles, consider affordable options such as dba programs, which offer flexible paths to advanced business leadership. These programs emphasize strategic thinking and data-driven decision-making, skills highly applicable to mathematical problem-solving.

For those leaning towards financial sectors, affordable education can be found in cheap masters in finance. These programs combine finance theory with quantitative analysis, allowing math graduates to leverage their numerical expertise effectively.

Additionally, if fast-tracking your education is a priority, the fastest mba programs online offer accelerated routes to business management roles, blending leadership skills with analytical approaches.

Marketing is another growing area where math skills are valuable, especially in digital analytics. Check out the masters in digital marketing, which combine creativity with data-driven strategies that are increasingly essential in today’s marketplace.

Recently Published Articles