World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
11312
World Ranking
5973
National Ranking
210

Graciela Metternicht publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graciela Metternicht sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 184 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Graciela Metternicht D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Graciela Metternicht sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Remote sensing of soil salinity: potentials and constraints

    Unknown

  • Testing the performance of spatial interpolation techniques for mapping soil properties

    Unknown

  • Remote sensing of landslides: An analysis of the potential contribution to geo-spatial systems for hazard assessment in mountainous environments

    Unknown

  • Initial progress in implementing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a review of evidence from countries

    Cameron Allen;Graciela Metternicht;Thomas Wiedmann

  • Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality

    Annette L. Cowie;Barron J. Orr;Barron J. Orr;Barron J. Orr;Victor M. Castillo Sanchez;Victor M. Castillo Sanchez;Pamela Chasek

  • Ten facts about land systems for sustainability

    Unknown

  • Prioritising SDG targets: assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages

    Cameron Allen;Graciela Metternicht;Thomas Wiedmann

  • National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A comparative review of scenario modelling tools

    Cameron Allen;Graciela Metternicht;Thomas Wiedmann;Thomas Wiedmann

  • Vegetation indices derived from high-resolution airborne videography for precision crop management

    Unknown

  • Spatial discrimination of salt- and sodium-affected soil surfaces

    Unknown

  • Remote Sensing of Soil Salinization : Impact on Land Management

    Unknown

  • Marine Spatial Planning advancing the Ecosystem-Based Approach to coastal zone management: A review

    Elianny Domínguez-Tejo;Graciela Metternicht;Emma Johnston;Luke Hedge

  • Assessing temporal and spatial changes of salinity using fuzzy logic, remote sensing and GIS. Foundations of an expert system

    Unknown

  • Unpacking the concept of land degradation neutrality and addressing its operation through the Rio Conventions

    Mariam Akhtar-Schuster;Lindsay C. Stringer;Alexander Erlewein;Graciela Metternicht

  • Change detection assessment using fuzzy sets and remotely sensed data: an application of topographic map revision

    Graciela Metternicht

  • Indicator-based assessments of progress towards the sustainable development goals (SDGs): a case study from the Arab region

    Cameron Allen;Reem Nejdawi;Jana El-Baba;Kamil Hamati

  • Post-2020 biodiversity framework challenged by cropland expansion in protected areas

    Unknown

  • Estimating Erosion Surface Features by Linear Mixture Modeling

    Unknown

  • Geomorphometric landscape analysis using a semi-automated GIS-approach

    Unknown

  • Evaluating the information content of JERS-1 SAR and Landsat TM data for discrimination of soil erosion features

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Wiedmann
Thomas Wiedmann University of New South Wales
Annette Cowie
Annette Cowie University of New England
Lindsay C. Stringer
Lindsay C. Stringer University of York
Peter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Richard Lucas
Richard Lucas Aberystwyth University
Jinwei Dong
Jinwei Dong Chinese Academy of Sciences
Xiangming Xiao
Xiangming Xiao University of Oklahoma
Mark Stafford Smith
Mark Stafford Smith Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Thomas R. Loveland
Thomas R. Loveland United States Geological Survey
Unai Pascual
Unai Pascual Ikerbasque

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and enhance interdisciplinary knowledge. Many students find value in pursuing a bachelors degree in sociology online, which complements environmental studies by providing insight into societal impacts and human behavior related to ecological issues.

Educators and professionals aiming to advance in academia or leadership often consider online EdD programs. Options like an online edd no dissertation are particularly appealing for those seeking flexibility and a streamlined path to a doctorate without the traditional dissertation requirement.

Additionally, those looking to deepen their expertise can explore online eds to edd programs. These pathways offer a seamless transition from a master's-level degree in education to a doctoral degree, supporting career advancement within academic and administrative roles.

For professionals committed to social impact through mental health and community services, pursuing online dsw programs in social work provides advanced training and leadership skills essential for addressing environmental justice and sustainability challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Graciela Metternicht