World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 73 5056 4590 1574 1310 222 16727

Frederick W. Dahlquist publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frederick W. Dahlquist between 1966 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frederick W. Dahlquist published across 59 years, from 1966 to 2024, averaging 4 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 1997. 1 of the 238 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1966 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 1997. 1966: 1 publication 1967: 1 publication 1968: 3 publications 1969: 7 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 1 publication 1975: 4 publications 1976: 3 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 3 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 8 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 6 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 8 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1966 2024

238 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frederick W. Dahlquist: publications per year, 1966 to 2024
Year Publications
1966 1
1967 1
1968 3
1969 7
1970 0
1971 0
1972 1
1973 1
1974 1
1975 4
1976 3
1977 2
1978 1
1979 3
1980 4
1981 5
1982 8
1983 5
1984 0
1985 4
1986 1
1987 6
1988 3
1989 8
1990 7
1991 6
1992 3
1993 5
1994 6
1995 7
1996 4
1997 14
1998 7
1999 2
2000 7
2001 7
2002 9
2003 1
2004 4
2005 3
2006 11
2007 13
2008 3
2009 4
2010 0
2011 9
2012 9
2013 2
2014 2
2015 4
2016 1
2017 8
2018 3
2019 1
2020 1
2021 0
2022 2
2023 0
2024 1
Total 238
Download as CSV

Frederick W. Dahlquist publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick W. Dahlquist sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 222 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216 222
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Frederick W. Dahlquist D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick W. Dahlquist sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561 73
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1975 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Frederick W. Dahlquist is affiliated with the University of California, Santa Barbara in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with particular emphasis on Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Genetics, Endocrinology, and Infectious Diseases.

The main topics of Dahlquist's work include:

  • Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Vibrio bacteria research studies
  • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

Their recent publications feature studies on molecular and bacterial mechanisms. These include:

  • "Rational design to control the trade-off between receptor affinity and cooperativity," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Proteolytic processing induces a conformational switch required for antibacterial toxin delivery," 2022, Nature Communications
  • "Author Correction: Proteolytic processing induces a conformational switch required for antibacterial toxin delivery," 2022, Nature Communications

Dahlquist has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Nicholas L. Bartelli
  • Victor J. Passanisi
  • K. Michalska
  • Ki-Ho Song
  • Dinh Q. Nhan

Their work has been published predominantly in Nature Communications and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, with multiple contributions to each venue.

Dahlquist was awarded fellowships by prominent institutions, including the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2011 and the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 1975.

Best Publications

  • Expression and nitrogen-15 labeling of proteins for proton and nitrogen-15 nuclear magnetic resonance.

    D C Muchmore;L P McIntosh;C B Russell;D E Anderson

  • Polarization-Enhanced NMR Spectroscopy of Biomolecules in Frozen Solution

    Dennis A. Hall;Douglas C. Maus;Douglas C. Maus;Gary J. Gerfen;Gary J. Gerfen;Souheil J. Inati;Souheil J. Inati

  • Studying excited states of proteins by NMR spectroscopy

    Frans A.A. Mulder;Anthony Mittermaier;Bin Hon;Frederick W. Dahlquist

  • pH-induced denaturation of proteins: a single salt bridge contributes 3-5 kcal/mol to the free energy of folding of T4 lysozyme.

    Unknown

  • Assembly of an MCP receptor, CheW, and kinase CheA complex in the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction pathway

    Julie A. Gegner;Daniel R. Graham;Amy F. Roth;Frederick W. Dahlquist

  • Measurement of Slow (μs−ms) Time Scale Dynamics in Protein Side Chains by 15N Relaxation Dispersion NMR Spectroscopy: Application to Asn and Gln Residues in a Cavity Mutant of T4 Lysozyme

    Frans A. A. Mulder;Nikolai R. Skrynnikov;Bin Hon;Frederick W. Dahlquist

  • Structural and thermodynamic consequences of burying a charged residue within the hydrophobic core of T4 lysozyme.

    S. Dao-Pin;D. E. Anderson;W. A. Baase;F. W. Dahlquist

  • Biosynthetic incorporation of 15N and 13C for assignment and interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance spectra of proteins

    Lawrence P. McIntosh;Frederick W. Dahlquist

  • Solution structure of a minor and transiently formed state of a T4 lysozyme mutant

    Guillaume Bouvignies;Pramodh Vallurupalli;D. Flemming Hansen;Bruno E. Correia;Bruno E. Correia

  • Solid-state synthesis and mechanical unfolding of polymers of T4 lysozyme

    Guoliang Yang;Ciro Cecconi;Walter A. Baase;Ingrid R. Vetter

  • The C-terminal half of the anti-sigma factor, FlgM, becomes structured when bound to its target, σ28

    Gary W. Daughdrill;Meggen S. Chadsey;Joyce E. Karlinsey;Kelly T. Hughes

  • Signal transduction in bacteria: CheW forms a reversible complex with the protein kinase CheA

    Julie A. Gegner;Frederick W. Dahlquist

  • Probing slow time scale dynamics at methyl-containing side chains in proteins by relaxation dispersion NMR measurements: application to methionine residues in a cavity mutant of T4 lysozyme.

    Nikolai R. Skrynnikov;Frans A. A. Mulder;Bin Hon;Frederick W. Dahlquist

  • 2D and 3D NMR spectroscopy employing carbon-13/carbon-13 magnetization transfer by isotropic mixing. Spin system identification in large proteins

    Stephen W. Fesik;Hugh L. Eaton;Edward T. Olejniczak;Erik R. P. Zuiderweg

  • The Amide 15N Chemical Shift Tensors of Four Peptides Determined from 13C Dipole-Coupled Chemical Shift Powder Patterns

    Terrence G. Oas;Cynthia J. Hartzell;Frederick W. Dahlquist;Gary P. Drobny

  • An HNCA Pulse Scheme for the Backbone Assignment of 15N,13C,2H-Labeled Proteins: Application to a 37-kDa Trp Repressor-DNA Complex

    Toshio Yamazaki;Weontae Lee;Matthew Revington;Debra L. Mattiello

  • Reconstructing NMR spectra of "invisible" excited protein states using HSQC and HMQC experiments.

    Nikolai R Skrynnikov;Frederick W Dahlquist;Lewis E Kay

  • Structural features of the epsilon subunit of the Escherichia coli ATP synthase determined by NMR spectroscopy.

    Stephan Wilkens;Frederick W. Dahlquist;Lawrence P. McIntosh;Logan W. Donaldson

  • Structural basis for the attachment of a paramyxoviral polymerase to its template

    Richard L. Kingston;Damon J. Hamel;Frederick W. Dahlquist

  • Secondary structure of a leucine zipper determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

    Terrence G. Oas;Lawrence P. McIntosh;Erin K. O'Shea;Frederick W. Dahlquist

  • Enzymatic deamidation of methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins in Escherichia coli catalyzed by the cheB gene product.

    Marilyn R. Kehry;Martha W. Bond;Michael W. Hunkapiller;Frederick W. Dahlquist

Frequent Co-Authors

Lawrence P. McIntosh
Lawrence P. McIntosh University of British Columbia
Lewis E. Kay
Lewis E. Kay University of Toronto
Brian W. Matthews
Brian W. Matthews University of Oregon
Frans A. A. Mulder
Frans A. A. Mulder Aarhus University
Melvin I. Simon
Melvin I. Simon California Institute of Technology
Norbert O. Reich
Norbert O. Reich University of California, Santa Barbara
Roderick A. Capaldi
Roderick A. Capaldi University of Oregon
Gary P. Drobny
Gary P. Drobny University of Washington
James A. Hoch
James A. Hoch Scripps Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens the door to diverse career paths beyond traditional laboratory roles. Many students explore types of paralegals who specialize in intellectual property or environmental law, where a chemistry background is a strong asset. This crossover highlights the flexibility of a chemistry degree in various sectors.

Pharmaceutical industries also offer promising opportunities. Aspiring professionals can look into becoming a pharmaceutical rep salary roles, which combine scientific knowledge with business skills to effectively promote and sell medications. These positions often require additional sales training but benefit greatly from a strong foundation in chemistry.

For those interested in healthcare, understanding pharmacist education requirements is vital. Pharmacists play a critical role in medication management and patient care, and a chemistry degree can be a major step toward this advanced education path.

Another intriguing path is medical examination assistance. Learning about how to become a medical examiner assistant can guide chemistry graduates interested in forensic science or pathology to valuable roles supporting death investigations.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick W. Dahlquist

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles