World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
65
Citations
17547
World Ranking
2181
National Ranking
24

Francesco Cherubini publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Cherubini sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 186 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Francesco Cherubini D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francesco Cherubini sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The biorefinery concept: Using biomass instead of oil for producing energy and chemicals

    Francesco Cherubini

  • Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations

    Francesco Cherubini;Neil David Bird;Annette Cowie;Gerfried Jungmeier

  • Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges.

    Francesco Cherubini;Anders Hammer Strømman

  • Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration

    Francesco Cherubini;Silvia Bargigli;Sergio Ulgiati

  • Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment.

    Felix Creutzig;Nijavalli H. Ravindranath;Göran Berndes;Simon Bolwig

  • CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming

    Francesco Cherubini;Glen Philip Peters;Terje Koren Berntsen;Anders Hammer Strømman

  • Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems – A LCA case study

    Francesco Cherubini;Sergio Ulgiati

  • Toward a common classification approach for biorefinery systems

    Francesco Cherubini;Gerfried Jungmeier;Maria Wellisch;Thomas Willke

  • LCA of a biorefinery concept producing bioethanol, bioenergy, and chemicals from switchgrass

    Francesco Cherubini;Gerfried Jungmeier

  • Which practices co‐deliver food security, climate change mitigation and adaptation, and combat land degradation and desertification?

    Pete Smith;Katherine Calvin;Johnson Nkem;Donovan Campbell

  • GHG balances of bioenergy systems – Overview of key steps in the production chain and methodological concerns

    Francesco Cherubini

  • Chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass: opportunities, perspectives, and potential of biorefinery systems.

    Francesco Cherubini;Anders H. Strømman

  • Global warming potential of carbon dioxide emissions from biomass stored in the anthroposphere and used for bioenergy at end of life.

    Geoffrey Guest;Francesco Cherubini;Anders H. Strømman

  • Quantifying surface albedo and other direct biogeophysical climate forcings of forestry activities.

    Ryan M. Bright;Ryan M. Bright;Kaiguang Zhao;Robert B. Jackson;Francesco Cherubini

  • Influence of allocation methods on the environmental performance of biorefinery products—A case study

    Francesco Cherubini;Anders Hammer Strømman;Sergio Ulgiati

  • Life cycle assessment of urban waste management: energy performances and environmental impacts. The case of Rome, Italy.

    Francesco Cherubini;Silvia Bargigli;Sergio Ulgiati

  • Climate impacts of bioenergy: Inclusion of carbon cycle and albedo dynamics in life cycle impact assessment

    Ryan M. Bright;Francesco Cherubini;Anders H. Strømman

  • Site-specific global warming potentials of biogenic CO2 for bioenergy: contributions from carbon fluxes and albedo dynamics

    Francesco Cherubini;Ryan M. Bright;Anders Hammer Strømman

  • LCA of magnesium production Technological overview and worldwide estimation of environmental burdens

    Francesco Cherubini;Marco Raugei;Sergio Ulgiati

  • Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals in the post-pandemic era

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those studying Environmental Sciences in the USA, expanding skill sets through related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Geographic Information Systems (GIS) play a crucial role in environmental analysis, spatial planning, and resource management. Exploring the best gis programs can provide advanced technical proficiency valuable in this field.

Public administration knowledge is also vital for shaping environmental policies and managing governmental or non-profit environmental organizations. Professionals may consider enrolling in a 1 year mpa online program to gain leadership skills quickly and efficiently.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts is another key area, making a bachelors degree in sociology online a complementary study path. This knowledge helps environmental scientists address community challenges related to sustainability and conservation.

For educators aiming to influence environmental studies curriculum or training programs, pursuing advanced qualifications without extensive research commitments can be appealing. Several online edd programs no dissertation provide this flexible pathway for career advancement in educational leadership.

Recently Published Articles