World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
63
Citations
12360
World Ranking
1988
National Ranking
55

Felix Kienast publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felix Kienast sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 166 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Felix Kienast D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Felix Kienast sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Felix Kienast is affiliated with the Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research in Switzerland. Their research primarily addresses topics within environmental science and social sciences, with significant contributions to global and planetary change, sociology and political science, health toxicology and mutagenesis, ecology, and management, monitoring, policy, and law.

Their scholarly work covers a diverse range of topics including:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Urban Green Space and Health
  • Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
  • Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
  • Place Attachment and Urban Studies
  • Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation

Kienast has published extensively in several key academic venues, notably:

  • Landscape and Urban Planning
  • Landscape Ecology
  • Urban Forestry & Urban Greening
  • Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Frequent collaborators include Marcel Hunziker, Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, Boris Šalak, Flurina M. Wartmann, and Reto Spielhofer, indicating a networked research approach across landscape and environmental studies.

Their recent research articles demonstrate a focus on public perceptions and the interaction between ecological metrics and societal factors. Selected papers include:

  • "Comparing outdoor recreation preferences in peri-urban landscapes using different data gathering methods," 2020, Landscape and Urban Planning
  • "Application of InVEST habitat quality module in spatially vulnerability assessment of natural habitats (case study: Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province, Iran)," 2020, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
  • "Factors influencing visual landscape quality perceived by the public. Results from a national survey," 2021, Landscape and Urban Planning
  • "Does rated visual landscape quality match visual features? An analysis for renewable energy landscapes," 2021, Landscape and Urban Planning
  • "Relating landscape ecological metrics with public survey data on perceived landscape quality and place attachment," 2021, Landscape Ecology

Kienast is also an author of book publications, such as "Landschaftsqualität in Regionalen Naturpärken. Ergebnisse der Landschaftsbeobachtung Schweiz LABES," published in 2023 by WSL-Berichte/WSL Berichte.

Best Publications

  • Predictive mapping of alpine grasslands in Switzerland: Species versus community approach

    Niklaus E. Zimmermann;Felix Kienast

  • Predicting the potential distribution of plant species in an alpine environment

    Antoine Guisan;Jean-Paul Theurillat;Felix Kienast

  • Suitability criteria for measures of urban sprawl

    Jochen A.G. Jaeger;René Bertiller;Christian Schwick;Felix Kienast

  • Mountain Ecosystem Services: Who Cares?

    Adrienne Grêt-Regamey;Sibyl Hanna Brunner;Felix Kienast

  • Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: Mapping marginal changes and trade-offs

    Roy Haines-Young;Marion Potschin;Felix Kienast

  • A chironomid-based Holocene summer air temperature reconstruction from the Swiss Alps

    Oliver Heiri;André F. Lotter;Sonja Hausmann;Felix Kienast

  • Flooding tolerance of Central European tree and shrub species

    C. Glenz;Rodolphe Schlaepfer;I. Iorgulescu;F. Kienast

  • Assessing Landscape Functions with Broad-Scale Environmental Data: Insights Gained from a Prototype Development for Europe

    Felix Kienast;Janine Bolliger;Marion Potschin;Rudolf S. de Groot

  • Analysis of historic landscape patterns with a Geographical Information System — a methodological outline

    Felix Kienast

  • Biotic and abiotic variables show little redundancy in explaining tree species distributions

    Eliane S. Meier;Felix Kienast;Peter B. Pearman;Jens-Christian Svenning

  • Factors influencing the acceptance of nature conservation measures--a qualitative study in Switzerland.

    Anita Schenk;Marcel Hunziker;Felix Kienast

  • Participatory landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement

    Matthias Buchecker;Marcel Hunziker;Felix Kienast

  • Potential impacts of changing agricultural activities on scenic beauty – a prototypical technique for automated rapid assessment

    Marcel Hunziker;Felix Kienast

  • Land use functions — a multifunctionality approach to assess the impact of land use changes on land use sustainability

    Marta Pérez-Soba;Sandrine Petit;Laurence Jones;Nathalie Bertrand

  • A simulated map of the potential natural forest vegetation of Switzerland

    B. Brzeziecki;F. Kienast;O. Wildi

  • GIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreation

    Felix Kienast;Barbara Degenhardt;Barbara Weilenmann;Yvonne Wäger

  • Multi-scale analysis of urban sprawl in Europe: towards a European de-sprawling strategy

    Ernest I. Hennig;Christian Schwick;Tomáš Soukup;Erika Orlitová

  • Classifying the life-history strategies of trees on the basis of the Grimian model

    Bogdan Brzeziecki;Felix Kienast

  • Urban permeation of landscapes and sprawl per capita: New measures of urban sprawl

    Jochen A.G. Jaeger;René Bertiller;Christian Schwick;Duncan Cavens

  • Assessing structures in mountain forests as a basis for investigating the forests' dynamics and protective function

    Peter Bebi;Felix Kienast;Walter Schönenberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Harald Bugmann
Harald Bugmann ETH Zurich
Niklaus E. Zimmermann
Niklaus E. Zimmermann Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Matthias Bürgi
Matthias Bürgi Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Antoine Guisan
Antoine Guisan University of Lausanne
Peter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Daniel Rigling
Daniel Rigling Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Heike Lischke
Heike Lischke Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Oliver Heiri
Oliver Heiri University of Basel
Roy Haines-Young
Roy Haines-Young University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution can open doors to related fields within healthcare, education, and research. Many students considering a career change look for flexible, online bridge degrees designed for non-majors—similar to speech pathology bridge programs online that allow students from diverse backgrounds to enter new specialties.

In healthcare, there’s a growing demand for professionals with scientific training. If your background is not in nursing but you are eager to pivot into patient care, accelerated nursing programs for non nurses offer a fast-track gateway to nursing credentials, often through online or hybrid platforms.

Career advancement in nursing—such as becoming a psychiatric nurse practitioner—can be especially rewarding. Prospective students often research location-based differences in pay, and sources like pmhnp salary by state can help guide career planning.

For those weighing commitment, it’s valuable to know details like how many years to become a nurse practitioner so you can choose a pathway that matches your ambitions and timeline. Exploring these options may enhance your knowledge and lead to diverse, in-demand roles.

Best Scientists Citing Felix Kienast

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles