World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Fanny Chevalier

Fanny Chevalier

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 33 12809 12435 487 466 120 3475

Fanny Chevalier publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fanny Chevalier between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fanny Chevalier published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2014. 20 of the 148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2014. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 8 publications
1999 2025

148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fanny Chevalier: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 8
2008 2
2009 1
2010 6
2011 3
2012 8
2013 7
2014 17
2015 6
2016 9
2017 9
2018 9
2019 7
2020 10
2021 11
2022 8
2023 6
2024 12
2025 8
Total 148
Download as CSV

Fanny Chevalier publications per year - data summary

  • Fanny Chevalier, a Computer Science scholar from University of Toronto, has 148 publications recorded across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1999 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2014, with 17 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1999 and 2009, with 1 publication each.
  • 7 of the 27 years in the span carry no publications at all (2000, 2001, 2002, 2003 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.5 papers per year over the whole span, or 7.4 per year counting only the 20 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 45 publications, 30% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1999-2007: 9 publications (1.0 per year); 2008-2016: 59 publications (6.6 per year); 2017-2025: 80 publications (8.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Fanny Chevalier publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fanny Chevalier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 112–121 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 120 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497 120
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Fanny Chevalier publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 32–41 to 991+ publications.
  • Fanny Chevalier, a Computer Science scholar from University of Toronto, records 120 publications - the 15th percentile of the discipline.
  • 15% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Fanny Chevalier, and about 85% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 202–211 publications range, and Fanny Chevalier ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–151 publications, holding 609 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 272–281 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 991 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Fanny Chevalier D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fanny Chevalier sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983 33
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Fanny Chevalier D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 14,188 Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 52 ranges running from 30–31 to 131+ D-Index.
  • Fanny Chevalier, a Computer Science scholar from University of Toronto, records 33 D-Index - the 13th percentile of the discipline.
  • 13% of ranked Computer Science scientists score the same or lower than Fanny Chevalier, and about 87% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44–45 D-Index range, and Fanny Chevalier ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 36–37 D-Index, holding 990 scientists (7% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54–55 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Fanny Chevalier is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, with a particular focus on subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, and Human-Computer Interaction. Their research spans several topics, prominently Data Visualization and Analytics, Video Analysis and Summarization, and Machine Learning in Healthcare, among others.

Chevalier's recent publications reflect a concentration on visualization, interaction, and data presentation in computing contexts. Notable papers include "Data Comics for Reporting Controlled User Studies in Human-Computer Interaction" (2020) published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, "Interactive Data Comics" (2021) also in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, "A Survey of Tasks and Visualizations in Multiverse Analysis Reports" (2022) in Computer Graphics Forum, "Get To The Point! Problem-Based Curated Data Views To Augment Care For Critically Ill Patients" (2022) presented at the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, and "Computational skills by stealth in introductory data science teaching" (2021) in Teaching Statistics.

Frequent coauthors in Chevalier's work include Benjamin Bach, Yvonne Jansen, Zezhong Wang, Minfan Zhang, and Mjaye Mazwi, with multiple collaborations recorded. This highlights a collaborative research network emphasizing both visualization and interaction in data-centric studies.

Their work has been disseminated across several publication venues, indicating a broad engagement with both theoretical and applied research communities. Key venues where Chevalier's work appears most often include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • ACM Transactions on Graphics
  • Computer Graphics Forum
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Chevalier's research areas can be detailed further by the primary topics they cover, such as:

  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Video Analysis and Summarization
  • Data Analysis with R
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Educational Games and Gamification

The scientist's work reflects a consistent focus on improving methods for presenting and interacting with complex data, often incorporating elements of human-computer interaction and advanced analytics. This multifaceted research aligns with current trends in enhancing data accessibility and usability across various domains.

Best Publications

  • Graphdice: a system for exploring multivariate social networks

    A. Bezerianos;F. Chevalier;P. Dragicevic;N. Elmqvist

  • Topology-aware navigation in large networks

    Tomer Moscovich;Fanny Chevalier;Nathalie Henry;Emmanuel Pietriga

  • Modeling and Understanding Human Routine Behavior

    Nikola Banovic;Tofi Buzali;Fanny Chevalier;Jennifer Mankoff

  • Visualization Literacy at Elementary School

    Basak Alper;Nathalie Henry Riche;Fanny Chevalier;Jeremy Boy

  • Interactive Exploration of Implicit and Explicit Relations in Faceted Datasets

    Jian Zhao;Christopher Collins;Fanny Chevalier;Ravin Balakrishnan

  • Draco: bringing life to illustrations with kinetic textures

    Rubaiat Habib Kazi;Fanny Chevalier;Tovi Grossman;Shengdong Zhao

  • Exploratory Analysis of Time-Series with ChronoLenses

    Jian Zhao;F. Chevalier;E. Pietriga;R. Balakrishnan

  • Kitty: sketching dynamic and interactive illustrations

    Rubaiat Habib Kazi;Fanny Chevalier;Tovi Grossman;George Fitzmaurice

  • Increasing the Transparency of Research Papers with Explorable Multiverse Analyses

    Pierre Dragicevic;Yvonne Jansen;Abhraneel Sarma;Matthew Kay

  • Animations 25 Years Later: New Roles and Opportunities

    Fanny Chevalier;Nathalie Henry Riche;Catherine Plaisant;Amira Chalbi

  • Using text animated transitions to support navigation in document histories

    Fanny Chevalier;Pierre Dragicevic;Anastasia Bezerianos;Jean-Daniel Fekete

  • KronoMiner: using multi-foci navigation for the visual exploration of time-series data

    Jian Zhao;Fanny Chevalier;Ravin Balakrishnan

  • The Not-so-Staggering Effect of Staggered Animated Transitions on Visual Tracking

    Fanny Chevalier;Pierre Dragicevic;Steven Franconeri

  • Facilitating Discourse Analysis with Interactive Visualization

    Jian Zhao;F. Chevalier;C. Collins;R. Balakrishnan

  • DataInk

    Unknown

  • Running an HCI experiment in multiple parallel universes

    Pierre Dragicevic;Fanny Chevalier;Stephane Huot

  • Supporting Handoff in Asynchronous Collaborative Sensemaking Using Knowledge-Transfer Graphs

    Jian Zhao;Michael Glueck;Petra Isenberg;Fanny Chevalier

  • Multi-Device Storyboards for Cinematic Narratives in VR

    Rorik Henrikson;Bruno Araujo;Fanny Chevalier;Karan Singh

  • Retrieval of objects in video by similarity based on graph matching

    F. Chevalier;J. P. Domenger;J. Benois-Pineau;M. Delest

  • Observations and Reflections on Visualization Literacy in Elementary School

    Fanny Chevalier;Nathalie Henry Riche;Basak Alper;Catherine Plaisant

  • Leveraging Text-Chart Links to Support Authoring of Data-Driven Articles with VizFlow

    Nicole Sultanum;Fanny Chevalier;Zoya Bylinskii;Zhicheng Liu

  • DataInk: Direct and Creative Data-Oriented Drawing

    Haijun Xia;Nathalie Henry Riche;Fanny Chevalier;Bruno De Araujo

  • Using Concrete Scales: A Practical Framework for Effective Visual Depiction of Complex Measures

    Fanny Chevalier;Romain Vuillemot;Guia Gali

Frequent Co-Authors

Tovi Grossman
Tovi Grossman University of Toronto
Jean-Daniel Fekete
Jean-Daniel Fekete French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
Pierre Dragicevic
Pierre Dragicevic French Institute for Research in Computer Science and Automation - INRIA
George Fitzmaurice
George Fitzmaurice Autodesk (United States)
Karan Singh
Karan Singh University of Toronto
Ravin Balakrishnan
Ravin Balakrishnan University of Toronto
Nathalie Henry Riche
Nathalie Henry Riche Microsoft (United States)
Azam Khan
Azam Khan Trax.co
Michael Brudno
Michael Brudno University of Toronto
Niklas Elmqvist
Niklas Elmqvist University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide range of related online degrees and career opportunities. Students interested in technology might also consider pursuing an electrical engineering degree online admissions, which offers flexible study options in a highly sought-after field.

For those looking to upskill quickly, there are easy certifications that pay well. These certifications can provide a fast track to lucrative roles in IT, networking, cybersecurity, and cloud computing—often with a lower time and financial investment than traditional degrees.

If you’re aiming to advance your career rapidly, consider one of the quickest masters degree online programs. Many universities in the USA now offer accelerated online master’s degrees in computing and engineering, letting you earn valuable credentials in as little as 12 months.

Finally, for those considering graduate studies, review the list of graduate degrees that are worth it. These include advanced programs in data science, artificial intelligence, and software engineering, all of which are in high demand across many industries.

Best Scientists Citing Fanny Chevalier

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles