World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
64
Citations
14646
World Ranking
2795
National Ranking
1225

Ryan J. Taft publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryan J. Taft sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 151 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Ryan J. Taft D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryan J. Taft sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ryan J. Taft is affiliated with Illumina in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work spans multiple subfields including genetics, molecular biology, pathology and forensic medicine, clinical biochemistry, and cancer research.

The scientist's research focuses primarily on genomics and rare diseases. Other main topics include genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, genetic factors in colorectal cancer, RNA modifications and cancer, metabolism and genetic disorders, cancer genomics and diagnostics, and BRCA gene mutations in cancer.

Ryan J. Taft has published in several prominent venues, notably:

  • Genetics in Medicine Open
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • npj Genomic Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Genetics and Metabolism

Frequent co-authors include Denise Perry, Erin Thorpe, Adeline Vanderver, Alison J. Coffey, and Alka Malhotra. The collaborations with these researchers indicate a networked approach across multiple disciplines and topics relevant to genetics and genomics.

Several recent publications illustrate the scope of Taft's work:

  • ExpansionHunter Denovo: a computational method for locating known and novel repeat expansions in short-read sequencing data, 2020, Genome Biology
  • Effect of Whole-Genome Sequencing on the Clinical Management of Acutely Ill Infants With Suspected Genetic Disease, 2021, JAMA Pediatrics
  • Best practices for the analytical validation of clinical whole-genome sequencing intended for the diagnosis of germline disease, 2020, npj Genomic Medicine
  • Spinal muscular atrophy diagnosis and carrier screening from genome sequencing data, 2020, Genetics in Medicine
  • Best practices for the interpretation and reporting of clinical whole genome sequencing, 2022, npj Genomic Medicine

Best Publications

  • Non‐coding RNAs: regulators of disease

    Ryan J Taft;Ken C Pang;Timothy R Mercer;Marcel Dinger

  • The relationship between non-protein-coding DNA and eukaryotic complexity.

    Ryan J. Taft;Michael Pheasant;John S. Mattick

  • The reality of pervasive transcription

    Michael B. Clark;Paulo P. Amaral;Felix J. Schlesinger;Marcel E. Dinger

  • Small RNAs derived from snoRNAs

    Ryan J. Taft;Evgeny A. Glazov;Timo Lassmann;Yoshihide Hayashizaki

  • The transcriptional network that controls growth arrest and differentiation in a human myeloid leukemia cell line

    Harukazu Suzuki;Alistair R.R. Forrest;Erik Van Nimwegen;Carsten O. Daub

  • The long non-coding RNA Gomafu is acutely regulated in response to neuronal activation and involved in schizophrenia-associated alternative splicing.

    Guy Barry;J. A. Briggs;D. P. Vanichkina;E. M. Poth

  • Tiny RNAs associated with transcription start sites in animals.

    Ryan J Taft;Evgeny A Glazov;Nicole Cloonan;Cas Simons

  • Detection of long repeat expansions from PCR-free whole-genome sequence data.

    Egor Dolzhenko;Joke J.F.A. van Vugt;Richard J. Shaw;Mitchell A. Bekritsky

  • A transcriptional sketch of a primary human breast cancer by 454 deep sequencing

    Alessandro Guffanti;Michele Iacono;Paride Pelucchi;Namshin Kim;Namshin Kim

  • A global view of genomic information--moving beyond the gene and the master regulator.

    John S. Mattick;Ryan J. Taft;Geoffrey J. Faulkner

  • ExpansionHunter: A sequence-graph based tool to analyze variation in short tandem repeat regions.

    Egor Dolzhenko;Viraj Deshpande;Felix Schlesinger;Peter Krusche

  • Dynamic isomiR regulation in Drosophila development

    Selene L. Fernandez-Valverde;Ryan J. Taft;John S. Mattick

  • Transcriptional Convergence of Oligodendrocyte Lineage Progenitors during Development.

    Sueli Marques;David van Bruggen;Darya Pavlovna Vanichkina;Darya Pavlovna Vanichkina;Elisa Mariagrazia Floriddia

  • MicroRNAs in β-cell biology, insulin resistance, diabetes and its complications

    Selene L. Fernandez-Valverde;Ryan J. Taft;John S. Mattick

  • Genome-wide discovery of human splicing branchpoints

    Tim R. Mercer;Tim R. Mercer;Michael B. Clark;Michael B. Clark;Stacey B. Andersen;Marion E. Brunck

  • A De Novo Mutation in the β-Tubulin Gene TUBB4A Results in the Leukoencephalopathy Hypomyelination with Atrophy of the Basal Ganglia and Cerebellum

    Cas Simons;Nicole I. Wolf;Nathan McNeil;Ljubica Caldovic

  • Mutations in DARS Cause Hypomyelination with Brain Stem and Spinal Cord Involvement and Leg Spasticity

    Ryan J. Taft;Adeline Vanderver;Richard J. Leventer;Stephen A. Damiani

  • Nuclear-localized tiny RNAs are associated with transcription initiation and splice sites in metazoans

    Ryan J Taft;Cas Simons;Satu Nahkuri;Harald Oey

  • A clinical approach to the diagnosis of patients with leukodystrophies and genetic leukoencephelopathies

    Sumit Parikh;Geneviève Bernard;Richard J. Leventer;Marjo S. van der Knaap

  • Targeted sequencing for gene discovery and quantification using RNA CaptureSeq

    Tim R Mercer;Michael B Clark;Joanna Crawford;Marion E Brunck

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Mattick
John S. Mattick University of New South Wales
Sean M. Grimmond
Sean M. Grimmond University of Melbourne
Marcel E. Dinger
Marcel E. Dinger University of Sydney
Tim R. Mercer
Tim R. Mercer Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Noriko Miyake
Noriko Miyake Yokohama City University
Timo Lassmann
Timo Lassmann Telethon Kids Institute
Geoffrey J. Faulkner
Geoffrey J. Faulkner University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring genetics in the USA opens doors to a range of vibrant and rewarding career options across healthcare, research, and education. For those interested in integrating genetics with patient care, nursing remains a popular and accessible path. You may be wondering, is the teas test required for all nursing programs? Not all institutions have this requirement, so it’s possible to find flexible entry points into nursing studies.

Students often look for affordable and accelerated options in health sciences. For example, if you’re aiming for healthcare administration roles, consider the cheapest mha programs online for a cost-effective route to management. Those seeking a quicker entry into clinical practice may appreciate shortest lpn program offerings, which can fast-track your career in nursing.

For advanced study and research, there are also options for pursuing an online phd nursing, enabling graduates to lead in academic or healthcare settings. These flexible online degree choices make it easier to blend genetics with related disciplines, broadening your expertise and career potential.

Best Scientists Citing Ryan J. Taft

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles